我希望使我的代码更具可读性,以及使用工具,如IDE代码检查和/或静态代码分析(FindBugs和Sonar),以避免nullpointerexception。许多工具似乎与彼此的@NotNull/@NonNull/ @NonNull注释不兼容,在我的代码中列出所有这些工具会让人难以阅读。有没有什么建议,哪一个是“最好的”?下面是我找到的等价注释列表:

javax.validation.constraints.NotNull Created for runtime validation, not static analysis. documentation edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.NonNull Used by FindBugs (dead project) and its successor SpotBugs static analysis and therefore Sonar (now Sonarqube) FindBugs documentation, SpotBugs documentation javax.annotation.Nonnull This might work with FindBugs too, but JSR-305 is inactive. (See also: What is the status of JSR 305?) source org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull Used by IntelliJ IDEA IDE for static analysis. documentation lombok.NonNull Used to control code generation in Project Lombok. Placeholder annotation since there is no standard. source, documentation androidx.annotation.NonNull Marker annotation available in Android, provided by annotation package documentation org.eclipse.jdt.annotation.NonNull Used by Eclipse for static code analysis documentation


当前回答

太阳现在没有自己的了吗?这是什么: http://www.java2s.com/Open-Source/Java-Document/6.0-JDK-Modules-com.sun/istack/com.sun.istack.internal.htm

这似乎与我在过去几年中使用过的所有Java版本都打包在一起。

编辑:正如下面评论中提到的,你可能不想使用这些。在这种情况下,我的投票是IntelliJ jetbrains注释!

其他回答

我非常喜欢检查器框架,它是类型注释(JSR-308)的实现,用于实现像null检查器这样的缺陷检查器。我并没有尝试其他任何方法进行比较,但我对这个实现感到满意。

我没有加入提供该软件的组织,但我是它的粉丝。

我喜欢这个系统的四个方面:

It has a defect checkers for nullness (@Nullable), but also has ones for immutability and interning (and others). I use the first one (nullness) and I'm trying to get into using the second one (immutability/IGJ). I'm trying out the third one, but I'm not certain about using it long term yet. I'm not convinced of the general usefulness of the other checkers yet, but its nice to know that the framework itself is a system for implementing a variety of additional annotations and checkers. The default setting for nullness checking works well: Non-null except locals (NNEL). Basically this means that by default the checker treats everyhing (instance variables, method parameters, generic types, etc) except local variables as if they have a @NonNull type by default. Per the documentation: The NNEL default leads to the smallest number of explicit annotations in your code. You can set a different default for a class or for a method if NNEL doesn't work for you. This framework allows you to use with without creating a dependency on the framework by enclosing your annotations in a comment: e.g. /*@Nullable*/. This is nice because you can annotate and check a library or shared code, but still be able to use that library/shared coded in another project that doesn't use the framework. This is a nice feature. I've grown accustom to using it, even though I tend to enable the Checker Framework on all my projects now. The framework has a way to annotate APIs you use that aren't already annotated for nullness by using stub files.

Eclipse也有自己的注释。

org.eclipse.jdt.annotation.NonNull

详情见http://wiki.eclipse.org/JDT_Core/Null_Analysis。

我使用IntelliJ,因为我最关心的是IntelliJ标记可能产生NPE的东西。我同意在JDK中没有标准注释是令人沮丧的。有传言说要添加它,它可能会加入到Java 7中。这样的话,就多了一个选择!

只是指出Java验证API (javax.validation.constraints.*)没有提供@Nullable注释,这在静态分析上下文中非常有价值。这对于运行时bean验证是有意义的,因为这是Java中任何非基本字段的默认值(即没有需要验证/强制的内容)。为达到上述目的,应权衡备选方案。

对于Android项目,您应该使用Android .support.annotation. nonnull和Android .support.annotation. nullable。这些和其他有用的特定于android的注释在支持库中可用。

从http://tools.android.com/tech-docs/support-annotations:

支持库本身也使用这些注释 注解,所以作为支持库的用户,Android Studio将 检查您的代码并基于这些标记潜在的问题 注释。