较新的项目可能应该使用jakarta。annotation-api(雅加达。注释包)。 它从现在的只读javax链接。注释回购和适应新的Jakarta生态系统，旨在将社区从所有与javax相关的头痛中解放出来。

在Java 8中还有另一种方法可以做到这一点。 我正在做两件事来完成我所需要的:

通过使用java.util.Optional包装可空字段，使可空字段显式地使用类型 在构造时使用java.util.Objects.requireNonNull检查所有非空字段是否为空

例子:

编辑:忽略第一个例子，我只是把这里作为评论对话的上下文。跳过这之后的推荐选项(第二个代码块)。

    import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;

    public class Role {

      private final UUID guid;
      private final String domain;
      private final String name;
      private final Optional<String> description;

      public Role(UUID guid, String domain, String name, Optional<String> description) {
        this.guid = requireNonNull(guid);
        this.domain = requireNonNull(domain);
        this.name = requireNonNull(name);
        this.description = requireNonNull(description);
      }
   }

所以我的问题是，我们在使用java 8时需要注释吗?

编辑:我后来发现有些人认为在参数中使用Optional是一种不好的做法，这里有一个关于赞成和反对的很好的讨论，为什么Java 8的Optional不应该在参数中使用

考虑到在参数中使用Optional不是最佳实践，我们需要2个构造函数:

public class Role {
      
      // Required fields, will not be null (unless using reflection) 
      private final UUID guid;
      private final String domain;
      private final String name;
      // Optional field, not null but can be empty
      private final Optional<String> description;

  //Non null description
  public Role(UUID guid, String domain, String name, String description) {
        this.guid = requireNonNull(guid);
        this.domain = requireNonNull(domain);
        this.name = requireNonNull(name);

        // description will never be null
        requireNonNull(description);

        // but wrapped with an Optional
        this.description = Optional.of(description);
      }

  // Null description is assigned to Optional.empty
  public Role(UUID guid, String domain, String name) {
        this.guid = requireNonNull(guid);
        this.domain = requireNonNull(domain);
        this.name = requireNonNull(name);
        this.description = Optional.empty();
      }
  //Note that this accessor is not a getter.
  //I decided not to use the "get" suffix to distinguish from "normal" getters 
  public Optional<String> description(){ return description;} 
 }

如果你在做一个大项目，你最好创建自己的@Nullable和/或@NotNull注解。

例如:

@java.lang.annotation.Documented
@java.lang.annotation.Retention(java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
@java.lang.annotation.Target({java.lang.annotation.ElementType.FIELD,
                              java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD,    
                              java.lang.annotation.ElementType.PARAMETER,
                              java.lang.annotation.ElementType.LOCAL_VARIABLE})
public @interface Nullable 
{
}

如果您使用了正确的保留策略，那么注释在运行时将不可用。从这个角度来看，它只是一种内在的东西。

尽管这不是一门严格的科学，但我认为使用内部类是最有意义的。

这是一个内在的东西。(没有功能或技术影响) 有很多很多的用法。 像IntelliJ这样的IDE支持自定义的@Nullable/@NotNull注释。 大多数框架也喜欢使用自己的内部版本。

其他问题(见评论):

如何在IntelliJ中配置这个?

点击IntelliJ状态栏右下角的“警官”。在弹出窗口中单击“配置巡检”。下一个……

对于Android项目，您应该使用Android .support.annotation. nonnull和Android .support.annotation. nullable。这些和其他有用的特定于android的注释在支持库中可用。

从http://tools.android.com/tech-docs/support-annotations:

支持库本身也使用这些注释 注解，所以作为支持库的用户，Android Studio将 检查您的代码并基于这些标记潜在的问题 注释。

One of the nice things about IntelliJ is that you don't need to use their annotations. You can write your own, or you can use those of whatever other tool you like. You're not even limited to a single type. If you're using two libraries that use different @NotNull annotations, you can tell IntelliJ to use both of them. To do this, go to "Configure Inspections", click on the "Constant Conditions & Exceptions" inspection, and hit the "Configure inspections" button. I use the Nullness Checker wherever I can, so I set up IntelliJ to use those annotations, but you can make it work with whatever other tool you want. (I have no opinion on the other tools because I've been using IntelliJ's inspections for years, and I love them.)

我非常喜欢检查器框架，它是类型注释(JSR-308)的实现，用于实现像null检查器这样的缺陷检查器。我并没有尝试其他任何方法进行比较，但我对这个实现感到满意。

我没有加入提供该软件的组织，但我是它的粉丝。

我喜欢这个系统的四个方面:

It has a defect checkers for nullness (@Nullable), but also has ones for immutability and interning (and others). I use the first one (nullness) and I'm trying to get into using the second one (immutability/IGJ). I'm trying out the third one, but I'm not certain about using it long term yet. I'm not convinced of the general usefulness of the other checkers yet, but its nice to know that the framework itself is a system for implementing a variety of additional annotations and checkers. The default setting for nullness checking works well: Non-null except locals (NNEL). Basically this means that by default the checker treats everyhing (instance variables, method parameters, generic types, etc) except local variables as if they have a @NonNull type by default. Per the documentation: The NNEL default leads to the smallest number of explicit annotations in your code. You can set a different default for a class or for a method if NNEL doesn't work for you. This framework allows you to use with without creating a dependency on the framework by enclosing your annotations in a comment: e.g. /*@Nullable*/. This is nice because you can annotate and check a library or shared code, but still be able to use that library/shared coded in another project that doesn't use the framework. This is a nice feature. I've grown accustom to using it, even though I tend to enable the Checker Framework on all my projects now. The framework has a way to annotate APIs you use that aren't already annotated for nullness by using stub files.