a can only be final here. Why? How can I reassign a in onClick() method without keeping it as private member? private void f(Button b, final int a){ b.addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() { @Override public void onClick(ClickEvent event) { int b = a*5; } }); } How can I return the 5 * a when it clicked? I mean, private void f(Button b, final int a){ b.addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() { @Override public void onClick(ClickEvent event) { int b = a*5; return b; // but return type is void } }); }
当前回答
Java内部类中的final变量[关于]
内部类只能使用
外部类引用 final局部变量来自范围外的引用类型(例如Object…) 值(原语)(例如int…)类型可以由最终引用类型包装。IntelliJ IDEA可以帮助您将其转换为一个元素数组
当编译器生成一个非静态嵌套(内部类)时-一个新类- <OuterClass>$<InnerClass>.class创建并将有界参数传递给构造函数[堆栈上的局部变量],它类似于闭包[Swift about]
Final变量是不能重新赋值的变量。最终引用变量仍然可以通过修改状态来更改
如果这是可能的,那就奇怪了,因为作为一个程序员,你可以做出这样的东西
//Not possible
private void foo() {
MyClass myClass = new MyClass(); //Case 1: myClass address is 1
int a = 5; //Case 2: a = 5
//just as an example
new Button().addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
@Override
public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
/*
myClass.something(); //<- what is the address - 1 or 2?
int b = a; //<- what is the value - 5 or 10 ?
//illusion that next changes are visible for Outer class
myClass = new MyClass();
a = 15;
*/
}
});
myClass = new MyClass(); //Case 1: myClass address is 2
int a = 10; //Case 2: a = 10
}
其他回答
正如注释中提到的,其中一些在Java 8中变得无关紧要,在Java 8中final可以是隐式的。但是,只有有效的final变量才能用于匿名内部类或lambda表达式。
这主要是由于Java管理闭包的方式。
When you create an instance of an anonymous inner class, any variables which are used within that class have their values copied in via the autogenerated constructor. This avoids the compiler having to autogenerate various extra types to hold the logical state of the "local variables", as for example the C# compiler does... (When C# captures a variable in an anonymous function, it really captures the variable - the closure can update the variable in a way which is seen by the main body of the method, and vice versa.)
As the value has been copied into the instance of the anonymous inner class, it would look odd if the variable could be modified by the rest of the method - you could have code which appeared to be working with an out-of-date variable (because that's effectively what would be happening... you'd be working with a copy taken at a different time). Likewise if you could make changes within the anonymous inner class, developers might expect those changes to be visible within the body of the enclosing method.
Making the variable final removes all these possibilities - as the value can't be changed at all, you don't need to worry about whether such changes will be visible. The only ways to allow the method and the anonymous inner class see each other's changes is to use a mutable type of some description. This could be the enclosing class itself, an array, a mutable wrapper type... anything like that. Basically it's a bit like communicating between one method and another: changes made to the parameters of one method aren't seen by its caller, but changes made to the objects referred to by the parameters are seen.
如果您对Java和c#闭包之间更详细的比较感兴趣,我有一篇文章对此进行了进一步的讨论。在这个答案中,我想专注于Java方面:)
有一个技巧允许匿名类在外部作用域中更新数据。
private void f(Button b, final int a) {
final int[] res = new int[1];
b.addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
@Override
public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
res[0] = a * 5;
}
});
// But at this point handler is most likely not executed yet!
// How should we now res[0] is ready?
}
然而,由于同步问题,这个技巧不是很好。如果处理程序稍后被调用,你需要1)同步访问res,如果处理程序从不同的线程调用2)需要有某种标志或指示res被更新
但是,如果匿名类在同一个线程中立即被调用,这个技巧就可以工作。如:
// ...
final int[] res = new int[1];
Runnable r = new Runnable() { public void run() { res[0] = 123; } };
r.run();
System.out.println(res[0]);
// ...
When an anonymous inner class is defined within the body of a method, all variables declared final in the scope of that method are accessible from within the inner class. For scalar values, once it has been assigned, the value of the final variable cannot change. For object values, the reference cannot change. This allows the Java compiler to "capture" the value of the variable at run-time and store a copy as a field in the inner class. Once the outer method has terminated and its stack frame has been removed, the original variable is gone but the inner class's private copy persists in the class's own memory.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_%28Java%29)
要理解这种限制的基本原理,请考虑以下程序:
public class Program {
interface Interface {
public void printInteger();
}
static Interface interfaceInstance = null;
static void initialize(int val) {
class Impl implements Interface {
@Override
public void printInteger() {
System.out.println(val);
}
}
interfaceInstance = new Impl();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
initialize(12345);
interfaceInstance.printInteger();
}
}
The interfaceInstance remains in memory after the initialize method returns, but the parameter val does not. The JVM can’t access a local variable outside its scope, so Java makes the subsequent call to printInteger work by copying the value of val to an implicit field of the same name within interfaceInstance. The interfaceInstance is said to have captured the value of the local parameter. If the parameter weren’t final (or effectively final) its value could change, becoming out of sync with the captured value, potentially causing unintuitive behavior.
private void f(Button b, final int a[]) {
b.addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
@Override
public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
a[0] = a[0] * 5;
}
});
}
推荐文章
- 在流中使用Java 8 foreach循环移动到下一项
- 访问限制:'Application'类型不是API(必需库rt.jar的限制)
- 用Java计算两个日期之间的天数
- 如何配置slf4j-simple
- 在Jar文件中运行类
- 带参数的可运行?
- 我如何得到一个字符串的前n个字符而不检查大小或出界?
- 我可以在Java中设置enum起始值吗?
- Java中的回调函数
- c#和Java中的泛型有什么不同?和模板在c++ ?
- 在Java中,流相对于循环的优势是什么?
- Jersey在未找到InjectionManagerFactory时停止工作
- 在Java流是peek真的只是调试?
- Recyclerview不调用onCreateViewHolder
- 将JSON字符串转换为HashMap