我如何在c#中生成一个随机的8个字符的字母数字字符串?
当前回答
我简单的一行代码为我工作:)
string random = string.Join("", Guid.NewGuid().ToString("n").Take(8).Select(o => o));
Response.Write(random.ToUpper());
Response.Write(random.ToLower());
对任意长度的字符串展开
public static string RandomString(int length)
{
//length = length < 0 ? length * -1 : length;
var str = "";
do
{
str += Guid.NewGuid().ToString().Replace("-", "");
}
while (length > str.Length);
return str.Substring(0, length);
}
其他回答
不使用Random的解决方案:
var chars = Enumerable.Repeat("ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789", 8);
var randomStr = new string(chars.SelectMany(str => str)
.OrderBy(c => Guid.NewGuid())
.Take(8).ToArray());
我听说LINQ是新的黑色，所以下面是我使用LINQ的尝试:
private static Random random = new Random();
public static string RandomString(int length)
{
const string chars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789";
return new string(Enumerable.Repeat(chars, length)
.Select(s => s[random.Next(s.Length)]).ToArray());
}
(注意:Random类的使用使得它不适用于任何与安全性相关的事情，比如创建密码或令牌。如果你需要强随机数生成器，请使用RNGCryptoServiceProvider类。)
一个包含所有字母字符和数字的解决方案，你可以随心所欲地更改:
public static string RandomString(int length)
{
Random rand = new Random();
string charbase = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";
return new string(Enumerable.Range(0,length)
.Select(_ => charbase[rand.Next(charbase.Length)])
.ToArray());
}
如果你喜欢单行方法;)
public static Random rand = new Random();
public const string charbase = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789";
public static string RandomString(int length) =>
new string(Enumerable.Range(0,length).Select(_ => charbase[rand.Next(charbase.Length)]).ToArray());
我的代码的主要目标是:
弦的分布几乎是均匀的(不关心微小的偏差，只要它们很小) 它为每个参数集输出超过几十亿个字符串。如果您的PRNG只生成20亿(31位熵)不同的值，那么生成8个字符的字符串(约47位熵)是没有意义的。 它是安全的，因为我希望人们使用它作为密码或其他安全令牌。
第一个属性是通过对字母大小取一个64位值的模来实现的。对于小字母(例如问题中的62个字符)，这导致了可以忽略不计的偏差。第二个和第三个属性是通过使用RNGCryptoServiceProvider而不是System.Random来实现的。
using System;
using System.Security.Cryptography;
public static string GetRandomAlphanumericString(int length)
{
const string alphanumericCharacters =
"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ" +
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" +
"0123456789";
return GetRandomString(length, alphanumericCharacters);
}
public static string GetRandomString(int length, IEnumerable<char> characterSet)
{
if (length < 0)
throw new ArgumentException("length must not be negative", "length");
if (length > int.MaxValue / 8) // 250 million chars ought to be enough for anybody
throw new ArgumentException("length is too big", "length");
if (characterSet == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("characterSet");
var characterArray = characterSet.Distinct().ToArray();
if (characterArray.Length == 0)
throw new ArgumentException("characterSet must not be empty", "characterSet");
var bytes = new byte[length * 8];
var result = new char[length];
using (var cryptoProvider = new RNGCryptoServiceProvider())
{
cryptoProvider.GetBytes(bytes);
}
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
ulong value = BitConverter.ToUInt64(bytes, i * 8);
result[i] = characterArray[value % (uint)characterArray.Length];
}
return new string(result);
}
在查看了其他答案并考虑了CodeInChaos的评论，以及CodeInChaos仍然有偏见(尽管较少)的答案之后，我认为需要一个最终的终极剪切和粘贴解决方案。所以在更新我的答案时，我决定全力以赴。
For an up to date version of this code, please visit the new Hg repository on Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/merarischroeder/secureswiftrandom. I recommend you copy and paste the code from: https://bitbucket.org/merarischroeder/secureswiftrandom/src/6c14b874f34a3f6576b0213379ecdf0ffc7496ea/Code/Alivate.SolidSwiftRandom/SolidSwiftRandom.cs?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default (make sure you click the Raw button to make it easier to copy and make sure you have the latest version, I think this link goes to a specific version of the code, not the latest).
更新说明:
Relating to some other answers - If you know the length of the output, you don't need a StringBuilder, and when using ToCharArray, this creates and fills the array (you don't need to create an empty array first) Relating to some other answers - You should use NextBytes, rather than getting one at a time for performance Technically you could pin the byte array for faster access.. it's usually worth it when your iterating more than 6-8 times over a byte array. (Not done here) Use of RNGCryptoServiceProvider for best randomness Use of caching of a 1MB buffer of random data - benchmarking shows cached single bytes access speed is ~1000x faster - taking 9ms over 1MB vs 989ms for uncached. Optimised rejection of bias zone within my new class.
问题的最终解决方案:
static char[] charSet = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789".ToCharArray();
static int byteSize = 256; //Labelling convenience
static int biasZone = byteSize - (byteSize % charSet.Length);
public string GenerateRandomString(int Length) //Configurable output string length
{
byte[] rBytes = new byte[Length]; //Do as much before and after lock as possible
char[] rName = new char[Length];
SecureFastRandom.GetNextBytesMax(rBytes, biasZone);
for (var i = 0; i < Length; i++)
{
rName[i] = charSet[rBytes[i] % charSet.Length];
}
return new string(rName);
}
但是你需要我的新(未经测试的)类:
/// <summary>
/// My benchmarking showed that for RNGCryptoServiceProvider:
/// 1. There is negligable benefit of sharing RNGCryptoServiceProvider object reference
/// 2. Initial GetBytes takes 2ms, and an initial read of 1MB takes 3ms (starting to rise, but still negligable)
/// 2. Cached is ~1000x faster for single byte at a time - taking 9ms over 1MB vs 989ms for uncached
/// </summary>
class SecureFastRandom
{
static byte[] byteCache = new byte[1000000]; //My benchmark showed that an initial read takes 2ms, and an initial read of this size takes 3ms (starting to raise)
static int lastPosition = 0;
static int remaining = 0;
/// <summary>
/// Static direct uncached access to the RNGCryptoServiceProvider GetBytes function
/// </summary>
/// <param name="buffer"></param>
public static void DirectGetBytes(byte[] buffer)
{
using (var r = new RNGCryptoServiceProvider())
{
r.GetBytes(buffer);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Main expected method to be called by user. Underlying random data is cached from RNGCryptoServiceProvider for best performance
/// </summary>
/// <param name="buffer"></param>
public static void GetBytes(byte[] buffer)
{
if (buffer.Length > byteCache.Length)
{
DirectGetBytes(buffer);
return;
}
lock (byteCache)
{
if (buffer.Length > remaining)
{
DirectGetBytes(byteCache);
lastPosition = 0;
remaining = byteCache.Length;
}
Buffer.BlockCopy(byteCache, lastPosition, buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
lastPosition += buffer.Length;
remaining -= buffer.Length;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Return a single byte from the cache of random data.
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
public static byte GetByte()
{
lock (byteCache)
{
return UnsafeGetByte();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Shared with public GetByte and GetBytesWithMax, and not locked to reduce lock/unlocking in loops. Must be called within lock of byteCache.
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
static byte UnsafeGetByte()
{
if (1 > remaining)
{
DirectGetBytes(byteCache);
lastPosition = 0;
remaining = byteCache.Length;
}
lastPosition++;
remaining--;
return byteCache[lastPosition - 1];
}
/// <summary>
/// Rejects bytes which are equal to or greater than max. This is useful for ensuring there is no bias when you are modulating with a non power of 2 number.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="buffer"></param>
/// <param name="max"></param>
public static void GetBytesWithMax(byte[] buffer, byte max)
{
if (buffer.Length > byteCache.Length / 2) //No point caching for larger sizes
{
DirectGetBytes(buffer);
lock (byteCache)
{
UnsafeCheckBytesMax(buffer, max);
}
}
else
{
lock (byteCache)
{
if (buffer.Length > remaining) //Recache if not enough remaining, discarding remaining - too much work to join two blocks
DirectGetBytes(byteCache);
Buffer.BlockCopy(byteCache, lastPosition, buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
lastPosition += buffer.Length;
remaining -= buffer.Length;
UnsafeCheckBytesMax(buffer, max);
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Checks buffer for bytes equal and above max. Must be called within lock of byteCache.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="buffer"></param>
/// <param name="max"></param>
static void UnsafeCheckBytesMax(byte[] buffer, byte max)
{
for (int i = 0; i < buffer.Length; i++)
{
while (buffer[i] >= max)
buffer[i] = UnsafeGetByte(); //Replace all bytes which are equal or above max
}
}
}
对于历史-我对这个答案的旧解决方案，使用随机对象:
private static char[] charSet =
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789".ToCharArray();
static rGen = new Random(); //Must share, because the clock seed only has Ticks (~10ms) resolution, yet lock has only 20-50ns delay.
static int byteSize = 256; //Labelling convenience
static int biasZone = byteSize - (byteSize % charSet.Length);
static bool SlightlyMoreSecurityNeeded = true; //Configuration - needs to be true, if more security is desired and if charSet.Length is not divisible by 2^X.
public string GenerateRandomString(int Length) //Configurable output string length
{
byte[] rBytes = new byte[Length]; //Do as much before and after lock as possible
char[] rName = new char[Length];
lock (rGen) //~20-50ns
{
rGen.NextBytes(rBytes);
for (int i = 0; i < Length; i++)
{
while (SlightlyMoreSecurityNeeded && rBytes[i] >= biasZone) //Secure against 1/5 increased bias of index[0-7] values against others. Note: Must exclude where it == biasZone (that is >=), otherwise there's still a bias on index 0.
rBytes[i] = rGen.NextByte();
rName[i] = charSet[rBytes[i] % charSet.Length];
}
}
return new string(rName);
}
性能:
securefastrrandom -第一次运行= ~9-33ms。听不清。持续:5毫秒(有时高达13毫秒)超过10,000次迭代，单次平均迭代= 1.5微秒。注意:通常需要2个缓存刷新，但偶尔需要8个缓存刷新——这取决于有多少单个字节超出了偏置区域 随机-第一次运行= ~0-1ms。听不清。正在进行:5毫秒超过10,000次迭代。单次平均迭代= 0.5微秒。速度差不多。
还可以看看:
https://bitbucket.org/merarischroeder/number-range-with-no-bias/src https://stackoverflow.com/a/45118325/887092
这些联系是另一种方法。缓冲可以添加到这个新的代码库中，但最重要的是探索不同的方法来消除偏差，并对速度和利弊进行基准测试。
