谁能给我一个很好的例子，CROSS APPLY在那些INNER JOIN也能工作的情况下发挥作用?

查看我博客上的文章，了解详细的性能比较:

内连接与交叉应用

CROSS APPLY在没有简单JOIN条件的情况下工作得更好。

它为t1中的每条记录从t2中选择3条最后的记录:

SELECT  t1.*, t2o.*
FROM    t1
CROSS APPLY
        (
        SELECT  TOP 3 *
        FROM    t2
        WHERE   t2.t1_id = t1.id
        ORDER BY
                t2.rank DESC
        ) t2o

它不容易用一个INNER连接条件来表述。

你可以使用CTE和window函数做一些类似的事情:

WITH    t2o AS
        (
        SELECT  t2.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY t1_id ORDER BY rank) AS rn
        FROM    t2
        )
SELECT  t1.*, t2o.*
FROM    t1
INNER JOIN
        t2o
ON      t2o.t1_id = t1.id
        AND t2o.rn <= 3

，但可读性较差，可能效率也较低。

更新:

只是检查。

master是一个大约有20,000,000条记录的表，id上有一个PRIMARY KEY。

这个查询:

WITH    q AS
        (
        SELECT  *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY id) AS rn
        FROM    master
        ),
        t AS 
        (
        SELECT  1 AS id
        UNION ALL
        SELECT  2
        )
SELECT  *
FROM    t
JOIN    q
ON      q.rn <= t.id

播放了近30秒，而这个:

WITH    t AS 
        (
        SELECT  1 AS id
        UNION ALL
        SELECT  2
        )
SELECT  *
FROM    t
CROSS APPLY
        (
        SELECT  TOP (t.id) m.*
        FROM    master m
        ORDER BY
                id
        ) q

是即时的。

交叉应用也适用于XML字段。如果您希望结合其他字段选择节点值。

例如，如果您有一个包含一些xml的表

根> < < subnode1 > <some_node value="1" /> <some_node value="2" /> <some_node value="3" /> <some_node value="4" /> < / subnode1 > 根> < /

使用查询

SELECT
       id as [xt_id]
      ,xmlfield.value('(/root/@attribute)[1]', 'varchar(50)') root_attribute_value
  ,node_attribute_value = [some_node].value('@value', 'int')
  ,lt.lt_name   
FROM dbo.table_with_xml xt
CROSS APPLY xmlfield.nodes('/root/subnode1/some_node') as g ([some_node])
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.lookup_table lt
ON [some_node].value('@value', 'int') = lt.lt_id

将返回一个结果

xt_id root_attribute_value node_attribute_value lt_name
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1     test1            1                    Benefits
1     test1            4                    FINRPTCOMPANY

当你需要子查询的列时，交叉应用可以用来替换子查询

子查询

select * from person p where
p.companyId in(select c.companyId from company c where c.companyname like '%yyy%')

在这里，我将无法选择公司表的列 使用交叉应用

select P.*,T.CompanyName
from Person p
cross apply (
    select *
    from Company C
    where p.companyid = c.companyId and c.CompanyName like '%yyy%'
) T

这是一篇解释这一切的文章，以及它们在join中的性能差异和用法。

SQL Server交叉应用和外部应用连接

正如本文所建议的，对于正常的连接操作(INNER和CROSS)，它们之间没有性能差异。

当你必须执行这样的查询时，使用差异就出现了:

CREATE FUNCTION dbo.fn_GetAllEmployeeOfADepartment(@DeptID AS INT)  
RETURNS TABLE 
AS 
RETURN 
   ( 
   SELECT * FROM Employee E 
   WHERE E.DepartmentID = @DeptID 
   ) 
GO 

SELECT * FROM Department D 
CROSS APPLY dbo.fn_GetAllEmployeeOfADepartment(D.DepartmentID)

也就是说，当你必须和函数联系起来的时候。这不能使用INNER JOIN来完成，这会给您一个错误“不能绑定多部分标识符”D.DepartmentID。在这里，读取每一行时将值传递给函数。听起来很酷。：）

在我看来，CROSS APPLY可以在复杂/嵌套查询中处理计算字段时填补一定的空白，并使它们更简单，更易于阅读。

简单的例子:你有一个DoB，你想要显示多个与年龄相关的字段，这些字段也依赖于其他数据源(比如就业)，比如Age、AgeGroup、AgeAtHiring、MinimumRetirementDate等，以便在最终用户应用程序中使用(例如Excel数据透视表)。

选择是有限的，很少是优雅的:

JOIN subqueries cannot introduce new values in the dataset based on data in the parent query (it must stand on its own). UDFs are neat, but slow as they tend to prevent parallel operations. And being a separate entity can be a good (less code) or a bad (where is the code) thing. Junction tables. Sometimes they can work, but soon enough you're joining subqueries with tons of UNIONs. Big mess. Create yet another single-purpose view, assuming your calculations don't require data obtained mid-way through your main query. Intermediary tables. Yes... that usually works, and often a good option as they can be indexed and fast, but performance can also drop due to to UPDATE statements not being parallel and not allowing to cascade formulas (reuse results) to update several fields within the same statement. And sometimes you'd just prefer to do things in one pass. Nesting queries. Yes at any point you can put parenthesis on your entire query and use it as a subquery upon which you can manipulate source data and calculated fields alike. But you can only do this so much before it gets ugly. Very ugly. Repeating code. What is the greatest value of 3 long (CASE...ELSE...END) statements? That's gonna be readable! Tell your clients to calculate the damn things themselves.

我错过什么了吗?可能吧，请随意评论。但是，嘿，CROSS APPLY在这种情况下就像天赐之物:您只需添加一个简单的CROSS APPLY(选择tbl。value + 1 as someFormula)作为crossTbl和voilà!您的新字段现在已经可以使用了，就像它一直在源数据中一样。

通过CROSS APPLY引入的值可以…

用于创建一个或多个计算字段，而不会增加性能、复杂性或可读性问题 像join一样，几个后续的CROSS APPLY语句可以引用它们自己:someFormula + 1 as someMoreFormula) as crossTbl2 您可以在后续的JOIN条件中使用CROSS APPLY引入的值 另外，还有表值函数方面

该死，没有什么是他们做不到的!

好吧，我不确定这是否有资格作为使用交叉应用与内部连接的原因，但这个查询在论坛帖子中使用交叉应用为我回答了，所以我不确定是否有一个等效的方法使用内部连接:

Create PROCEDURE [dbo].[Message_FindHighestMatches]

-- Declare the Topical Neighborhood
@TopicalNeighborhood nchar(255)

作为 开始

-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON

Create table  #temp
(
    MessageID         int,
    Subjects          nchar(255),
    SubjectsCount    int
)

Insert into #temp Select MessageID, Subjects, SubjectsCount From Message

Select Top 20 MessageID, Subjects, SubjectsCount,
    (t.cnt * 100)/t3.inputvalues as MatchPercentage

From #temp 

cross apply (select count(*) as cnt from dbo.Split(Subjects,',') as t1
             join dbo.Split(@TopicalNeighborhood,',') as t2
             on t1.value = t2.value) as t
cross apply (select count(*) as inputValues from dbo.Split(@TopicalNeighborhood,',')) as t3

Order By MatchPercentage desc

drop table #temp

END