当你需要子查询的列时，交叉应用可以用来替换子查询

子查询

select * from person p where
p.companyId in(select c.companyId from company c where c.companyname like '%yyy%')

在这里，我将无法选择公司表的列 使用交叉应用

select P.*,T.CompanyName
from Person p
cross apply (
    select *
    from Company C
    where p.companyid = c.companyId and c.CompanyName like '%yyy%'
) T

下面是一个简短的教程，可以保存在.sql文件中，并在SSMS中执行，这是我为自己编写的，可以快速刷新我对CROSS APPLY如何工作以及何时使用它的记忆:

-- Here's the key to understanding CROSS APPLY: despite the totally different name, think of it as being like an advanced 'basic join'.
-- A 'basic join' gives the Cartesian product of the rows in the tables on both sides of the join: all rows on the left joined with all rows on the right.
-- The formal name of this join in SQL is a CROSS JOIN.  You now start to understand why they named the operator CROSS APPLY.

-- Given the following (very) simple tables and data:
CREATE TABLE #TempStrings ([SomeString] [nvarchar](10) NOT NULL);
CREATE TABLE #TempNumbers ([SomeNumber] [int] NOT NULL);
CREATE TABLE #TempNumbers2 ([SomeNumber] [int] NOT NULL);
INSERT INTO #TempStrings VALUES ('111'); INSERT INTO #TempStrings VALUES ('222');
INSERT INTO #TempNumbers VALUES (111); INSERT INTO #TempNumbers VALUES (222);
INSERT INTO #TempNumbers2 VALUES (111); INSERT INTO #TempNumbers2 VALUES (222); INSERT INTO #TempNumbers2 VALUES (222);

-- Basic join is like CROSS APPLY; 2 rows on each side gives us an output of 4 rows, but 2 rows on the left and 0 on the right gives us an output of 0 rows:
SELECT
    st.SomeString, nbr.SomeNumber
FROM -- Basic join ('CROSS JOIN')
    #TempStrings st, #TempNumbers nbr
    -- Note: this also works:
    --#TempStrings st CROSS JOIN #TempNumbers nbr

-- Basic join can be used to achieve the functionality of INNER JOIN by first generating all row combinations and then whittling them down with a WHERE clause:
SELECT
    st.SomeString, nbr.SomeNumber
FROM -- Basic join ('CROSS JOIN')
    #TempStrings st, #TempNumbers nbr
WHERE
    st.SomeString = nbr.SomeNumber

-- However, for increased readability, the SQL standard introduced the INNER JOIN ... ON syntax for increased clarity; it brings the columns that two tables are
-- being joined on next to the JOIN clause, rather than having them later on in the WHERE clause.  When multiple tables are being joined together, this makes it
-- much easier to read which columns are being joined on which tables; but make no mistake, the following syntax is *semantically identical* to the above syntax:
SELECT
    st.SomeString, nbr.SomeNumber
FROM -- Inner join
    #TempStrings st INNER JOIN #TempNumbers nbr ON st.SomeString = nbr.SomeNumber

-- Because CROSS APPLY is generally used with a subquery, the subquery's WHERE clause will appear next to the join clause (CROSS APPLY), much like the aforementioned
-- 'ON' keyword appears next to the INNER JOIN clause.  In this sense, then, CROSS APPLY combined with a subquery that has a WHERE clause is like an INNER JOIN with
-- an ON keyword, but more powerful because it can be used with subqueries (or table-valued functions, where said WHERE clause can be hidden inside the function).
SELECT
    st.SomeString, nbr.SomeNumber
FROM
    #TempStrings st CROSS APPLY (SELECT * FROM #TempNumbers tempNbr WHERE st.SomeString = tempNbr.SomeNumber) nbr

-- CROSS APPLY joins in the same way as a CROSS JOIN, but what is joined can be a subquery or table-valued function.  You'll still get 0 rows of output if
-- there are 0 rows on either side, and in this sense it's like an INNER JOIN:
SELECT
    st.SomeString, nbr.SomeNumber
FROM
    #TempStrings st CROSS APPLY (SELECT * FROM #TempNumbers tempNbr WHERE 1 = 2) nbr

-- OUTER APPLY is like CROSS APPLY, except that if one side of the join has 0 rows, you'll get the values of the side that has rows, with NULL values for
-- the other side's columns.  In this sense it's like a FULL OUTER JOIN:
SELECT
    st.SomeString, nbr.SomeNumber
FROM
    #TempStrings st OUTER APPLY (SELECT * FROM #TempNumbers tempNbr WHERE 1 = 2) nbr

-- One thing CROSS APPLY makes it easy to do is to use a subquery where you would usually have to use GROUP BY with aggregate functions in the SELECT list.
-- In the following example, we can get an aggregate of string values from a second table based on matching one of its columns with a value from the first
-- table - something that would have had to be done in the ON clause of the LEFT JOIN - but because we're now using a subquery thanks to CROSS APPLY, we
-- don't need to worry about GROUP BY in the main query and so we don't have to put all the SELECT values inside an aggregate function like MIN().
SELECT
    st.SomeString, nbr.SomeNumbers
FROM
    #TempStrings st CROSS APPLY (SELECT SomeNumbers = STRING_AGG(tempNbr.SomeNumber, ', ') FROM #TempNumbers2 tempNbr WHERE st.SomeString = tempNbr.SomeNumber) nbr
-- ^ First the subquery is whittled down with the WHERE clause, then the aggregate function is applied with no GROUP BY clause; this means all rows are
--   grouped into one, and the aggregate function aggregates them all, in this case building a comma-delimited string containing their values.

DROP TABLE #TempStrings;
DROP TABLE #TempNumbers;
DROP TABLE #TempNumbers2;

好吧，我不确定这是否有资格作为使用交叉应用与内部连接的原因，但这个查询在论坛帖子中使用交叉应用为我回答了，所以我不确定是否有一个等效的方法使用内部连接:

Create PROCEDURE [dbo].[Message_FindHighestMatches]

-- Declare the Topical Neighborhood
@TopicalNeighborhood nchar(255)

作为 开始

-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON

Create table  #temp
(
    MessageID         int,
    Subjects          nchar(255),
    SubjectsCount    int
)

Insert into #temp Select MessageID, Subjects, SubjectsCount From Message

Select Top 20 MessageID, Subjects, SubjectsCount,
    (t.cnt * 100)/t3.inputvalues as MatchPercentage

From #temp 

cross apply (select count(*) as cnt from dbo.Split(Subjects,',') as t1
             join dbo.Split(@TopicalNeighborhood,',') as t2
             on t1.value = t2.value) as t
cross apply (select count(*) as inputValues from dbo.Split(@TopicalNeighborhood,',')) as t3

Order By MatchPercentage desc

drop table #temp

END

交叉应用有时可以让您做一些内部连接无法做到的事情。

示例(语法错误):

select F.* from sys.objects O  
inner join dbo.myTableFun(O.name) F   
on F.schema_id= O.schema_id

这是一个语法错误，因为当与内部连接一起使用时，表函数只能接受变量或常量作为参数。(也就是说，表函数参数不能依赖于另一个表的列。)

然而:

select F.* from sys.objects O  
cross apply ( select * from dbo.myTableFun(O.name) ) F  
where F.schema_id= O.schema_id

这是合法的。

编辑: 或者，更短的语法:(通过ErikE)

select F.* from sys.objects O  
cross apply dbo.myTableFun(O.name) F
where F.schema_id= O.schema_id

编辑:

注意: Informix 12.10 xC2+有横向派生表，Postgresql(9.3+)有横向子查询，可以达到类似的效果。

我想应该是可读性;)

CROSS APPLY对于阅读的人来说有点独特，它告诉他们正在使用一个UDF，该UDF将应用于左侧表中的每一行。

当然，还有其他一些限制，CROSS APPLY比JOIN更好用，其他朋友已经在上面发布了。

这可能是一个老问题，但我仍然喜欢CROSS APPLY的强大功能，它简化了逻辑的重用，并为结果提供了一种“链接”机制。

我在下面提供了一个SQL Fiddle，它展示了一个简单的示例，说明如何使用CROSS APPLY对数据集执行复杂的逻辑操作，而不会让事情变得一团糟。从这里不难推断出更复杂的计算。

http://sqlfiddle.com/ !3/23862/2