我真的想不出Python需要del关键字的任何原因(而且大多数语言似乎都没有类似的关键字)。例如,与其删除变量,还不如将None赋值给它。当从字典中删除时,可以添加del方法。
在Python中保留del是有原因的吗,还是它是Python前垃圾收集时代的遗迹?
我真的想不出Python需要del关键字的任何原因(而且大多数语言似乎都没有类似的关键字)。例如,与其删除变量,还不如将None赋值给它。当从字典中删除时,可以添加del方法。
在Python中保留del是有原因的吗,还是它是Python前垃圾收集时代的遗迹?
当前回答
"del"命令对于控制数组中的数据非常有用,例如:
elements = ["A", "B", "C", "D"]
# Remove first element.
del elements[:1]
print(elements)
输出:
[' b ', ' c ', ' d ']
其他回答
I think one of the reasons that del has its own syntax is that replacing it with a function might be hard in certain cases given it operates on the binding or variable and not the value it references. Thus if a function version of del were to be created a context would need to be passed in. del foo would need to become globals().remove('foo') or locals().remove('foo') which gets messy and less readable. Still I say getting rid of del would be good given its seemingly rare use. But removing language features/flaws can be painful. Maybe python 4 will remove it :)
del is the equivalent of "unset" in many languages and as a cross reference point moving from another language to python.. people tend to look for commands that do the same thing that they used to do in their first language... also setting a var to "" or none doesn't really remove the var from scope..it just empties its value the name of the var itself would still be stored in memory...why?!? in a memory intensive script..keeping trash behind its just a no no and anyways...every language out there has some form of an "unset/delete" var function..why not python?
除非重新初始化,否则Del将从当前作用域删除变量。将其设置为None将其保留在当前范围内。
a = "python string"
print(a)
del a
print(a)
a = "new python string"
print(a)
输出:
python string
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "testing.py", line 4, in <module>
print(a)
NameError: name 'a' is not defined
使用numpy.load后强制关闭文件:
这可能是一个小众的用法,但我发现它在使用numpy时很有用。加载以读取文件。每隔一段时间,我就会更新文件,需要复制一个同名的文件到目录中。
我使用del来释放文件,并允许我复制新文件。
注意,我想避免使用with context管理器,因为我在命令行上玩图,不想经常按tab键!
看这个问题。
在以上回答的基础上补充几点: 德尔x
x的定义表示r -> o(一个引用r指向一个对象o),但del x改变的是r而不是o。这是一个对对象的引用(指针)的操作,而不是与x相关的对象。区分r和o是这里的关键。
It removes it from locals(). Removes it from globals() if x belongs there. Removes it from the stack frame (removes the reference physically from it, but the object itself resides in object pool and not in the stack frame). Removes it from the current scope. It is very useful to limit the span of definition of a local variable, which otherwise can cause problems. It is more about declaration of the name rather than definition of content. It affects where x belongs to, not where x points to. The only physical change in memory is this. For example if x is in a dictionary or list, it (as a reference) is removed from there(and not necessarily from the object pool). In this example, the dictionary it belongs is the stack frame (locals()), which overlaps with globals().