我认为java没有静态接口方法，因为你不需要它们。你可能认为你知道，但是… 你会如何使用它们?如果你想叫他们

MyImplClass.myMethod()

那么就不需要在接口中声明它了。如果你想叫他们

myInstance.myMethod()

那么它就不应该是静态的。 如果您实际上打算使用第一种方法，但只是想强制每个实现都有这样的静态方法，那么它实际上是一种编码约定，而不是实现接口的实例和调用代码之间的契约。

接口允许您在实现接口的类实例和调用代码之间定义契约。java帮助您确保这个契约没有被违反，因此您可以依赖它，而不必担心哪个类实现了这个契约，只要“某个签署了契约的人”就足够了。在静态接口的情况下，你的代码

MyImplClass.myMethod()

不依赖于每个接口实现都有此方法的事实，因此不需要Java来帮助您确定使用它。

我认为java没有静态接口方法，因为你不需要它们。你可能认为你知道，但是… 你会如何使用它们?如果你想叫他们

MyImplClass.myMethod()

那么就不需要在接口中声明它了。如果你想叫他们

myInstance.myMethod()

那么它就不应该是静态的。 如果您实际上打算使用第一种方法，但只是想强制每个实现都有这样的静态方法，那么它实际上是一种编码约定，而不是实现接口的实例和调用代码之间的契约。

接口允许您在实现接口的类实例和调用代码之间定义契约。java帮助您确保这个契约没有被违反，因此您可以依赖它，而不必担心哪个类实现了这个契约，只要“某个签署了契约的人”就足够了。在静态接口的情况下，你的代码

MyImplClass.myMethod()

不依赖于每个接口实现都有此方法的事实，因此不需要Java来帮助您确定使用它。

静态方法不像实例方法那样是虚拟的，所以我猜想Java设计者决定不让它们出现在接口中。

但是您可以将包含静态方法的类放在接口中。你可以试试!

public interface Test {
    static class Inner {
        public static Object get() {
            return 0;
        }
    }
}

一个接口永远不能被静态地解引用，例如issomething .member。接口总是通过引用该接口子类实例的变量来解除引用。因此，如果没有其子类的实例，接口引用永远不可能知道它引用的是哪个子类。

Thus the closest approximation to a static method in an interface would be a non-static method that ignores "this", i.e. does not access any non-static members of the instance. At the low-level abstraction, every non-static method (after lookup in any vtable) is really just a function with class scope that takes "this" as an implicit formal parameter. See Scala's singleton object and interoperability with Java as evidence of that concept. And thus every static method is a function with class scope that does not take a "this" parameter. Thus normally a static method can be called statically, but as previously stated, an interface has no implementation (is abstract).

Thus to get closest approximation to a static method in an interface, is to use a non-static method, then don't access any of the non-static instance members. There would be no possible performance benefit any other way, because there is no way to statically link (at compile-time) a ISomething.member(). The only benefit I see of a static method in an interface is that it would not input (i.e. ignore) an implicit "this" and thus disallow access to any of the non-static instance members. This would declare implicitly that the function that doesn't access "this", is immutate and not even readonly with respect to its containing class. But a declaration of "static" in an interface ISomething would also confuse people who tried to access it with ISomething.member() which would cause a compiler error. I suppose if the compiler error was sufficiently explanatory, it would be better than trying to educate people about using a non-static method to accomplish what they want (apparently mostly factory methods), as we are doing here (and has been repeated for 3 Q&A times on this site), so it is obviously an issue that is not intuitive for many people. I had to think about it for a while to get the correct understanding.

在接口中获取可变静态字段的方法是在接口中使用非静态getter和setter方法，来访问子类中的静态字段。旁注，显然不可变静态可以在带有静态final的Java接口中声明。

假设你能做到;想想这个例子:

interface Iface {
  public static void thisIsTheMethod();
}

class A implements Iface {

  public static void thisIsTheMethod(){
    system.out.print("I'm class A");
  }

}

class B extends Class A {

  public static void thisIsTheMethod(){
    System.out.print("I'm class B");
  } 
}

SomeClass {

  void doStuff(Iface face) {
    IFace.thisIsTheMethod();
    // now what would/could/should happen here.
  }

}

虽然我意识到Java 8解决了这个问题，但我认为我应该加入我目前正在研究的一个场景(锁定在使用Java 7)，在这个场景中，能够在接口中指定静态方法将会很有帮助。

I have several enum definitions where I've defined "id" and "displayName" fields along with helper methods evaluating the values for various reasons. Implementing an interface allows me to ensure that the getter methods are in place but not the static helper methods. Being an enum, there really isn't a clean way to offload the helper methods into an inherited abstract class or something of the like so the methods have to be defined in the enum itself. Also because it is an enum, you wouldn't ever be able to actually pass it as an instanced object and treat it as the interface type, but being able to require the existence of the static helper methods through an interface is what I like about it being supported in Java 8.

下面的代码说明了我的观点。

接口定义:

public interface IGenericEnum <T extends Enum<T>> {
    String getId();
    String getDisplayName();
    //If I was using Java 8 static helper methods would go here
}

一个枚举定义的例子:

public enum ExecutionModeType implements IGenericEnum<ExecutionModeType> {
    STANDARD ("Standard", "Standard Mode"),
    DEBUG ("Debug", "Debug Mode");

    String id;
    String displayName;

    //Getter methods
    public String getId() {
        return id;
    }

    public String getDisplayName() {
        return displayName;
    }

    //Constructor
    private ExecutionModeType(String id, String displayName) {
        this.id = id;
        this.displayName = displayName;
    }

    //Helper methods - not enforced by Interface
    public static boolean isValidId(String id) {
        return GenericEnumUtility.isValidId(ExecutionModeType.class, id);
    }

    public static String printIdOptions(String delimiter){
        return GenericEnumUtility.printIdOptions(ExecutionModeType.class, delimiter);
    }

    public static String[] getIdArray(){
        return GenericEnumUtility.getIdArray(ExecutionModeType.class);
    }

    public static ExecutionModeType getById(String id) throws NoSuchObjectException {
        return GenericEnumUtility.getById(ExecutionModeType.class, id);
    }
}

通用枚举实用程序定义:

public class GenericEnumUtility {
    public static <T extends Enum<T> & IGenericEnum<T>> boolean isValidId(Class<T> enumType, String id) {       
        for(IGenericEnum<T> enumOption : enumType.getEnumConstants()) {
            if(enumOption.getId().equals(id)) {
                return true;
            }
        }

        return false;
    }

    public static <T extends Enum<T> & IGenericEnum<T>> String printIdOptions(Class<T> enumType, String delimiter){
        String ret = "";
        delimiter = delimiter == null ? " " : delimiter;

        int i = 0;
        for(IGenericEnum<T> enumOption : enumType.getEnumConstants()) {
            if(i == 0) {
                ret = enumOption.getId();
            } else {
                ret += delimiter + enumOption.getId();
            }           
            i++;
        }

        return ret;
    }

    public static <T extends Enum<T> & IGenericEnum<T>> String[] getIdArray(Class<T> enumType){
        List<String> idValues = new ArrayList<String>();

        for(IGenericEnum<T> enumOption : enumType.getEnumConstants()) {
            idValues.add(enumOption.getId());
        }

        return idValues.toArray(new String[idValues.size()]);
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public static <T extends Enum<T> & IGenericEnum<T>> T getById(Class<T> enumType, String id) throws NoSuchObjectException {
        id = id == null ? "" : id;
        for(IGenericEnum<T> enumOption : enumType.getEnumConstants()) {
            if(id.equals(enumOption.getId())) {
                return (T)enumOption;
            }
        }

        throw new NoSuchObjectException(String.format("ERROR: \"%s\" is not a valid ID. Valid IDs are: %s.", id, printIdOptions(enumType, " , ")));
    }
}