实际上，我找到了Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions。NullLogger<>，这看起来像是一个完美的解决方案。安装包Microsoft.Extensions.Logging。抽象，然后按照示例配置和使用它:

using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    ...

    services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, NullLoggerFactory>();

    ...
}

using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public class MyClass : IMyClass
{
    public const string ErrorMessageILoggerFactoryIsNull = "ILoggerFactory is null";

    private readonly ILogger<MyClass> logger;

    public MyClass(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
    {
        if (null == loggerFactory)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException(ErrorMessageILoggerFactoryIsNull, (Exception)null);
        }

        this.logger = loggerFactory.CreateLogger<MyClass>();
    }
}

单元测试

//using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
//using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

[TestMethod]
public void SampleTest()
{
    ILoggerFactory doesntDoMuch = new Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions.NullLoggerFactory();
    IMyClass testItem = new MyClass(doesntDoMuch);
    Assert.IsNotNull(testItem);
}   

在@ivan-samygin和@stakx的基础上进一步构建，这里有一些扩展方法，它们也可以匹配Exception和所有日志值(KeyValuePairs)。

这些工作(在我的机器上;))与。net Core 3, Moq 4.13.0和Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions 3.1.0。

/// <summary>
/// Verifies that a Log call has been made, with the given LogLevel, Message and optional KeyValuePairs.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Type of the class for the logger.</typeparam>
/// <param name="loggerMock">The mocked logger class.</param>
/// <param name="expectedLogLevel">The LogLevel to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedMessage">The Message to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedValues">Zero or more KeyValuePairs to verify.</param>
public static void VerifyLog<T>(this Mock<ILogger<T>> loggerMock, LogLevel expectedLogLevel, string expectedMessage, params KeyValuePair<string, object>[] expectedValues)
{
    loggerMock.Verify(mock => mock.Log(
        expectedLogLevel,
        It.IsAny<EventId>(),
        It.Is<It.IsAnyType>((o, t) => MatchesLogValues(o, expectedMessage, expectedValues)),
        It.IsAny<Exception>(),
        It.IsAny<Func<object, Exception, string>>()
        )
    );
}

/// <summary>
/// Verifies that a Log call has been made, with LogLevel.Error, Message, given Exception and optional KeyValuePairs.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Type of the class for the logger.</typeparam>
/// <param name="loggerMock">The mocked logger class.</param>
/// <param name="expectedMessage">The Message to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedException">The Exception to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedValues">Zero or more KeyValuePairs to verify.</param>
public static void VerifyLog<T>(this Mock<ILogger<T>> loggerMock, string expectedMessage, Exception expectedException, params KeyValuePair<string, object>[] expectedValues)
{
    loggerMock.Verify(logger => logger.Log(
        LogLevel.Error,
        It.IsAny<EventId>(),
        It.Is<It.IsAnyType>((o, t) => MatchesLogValues(o, expectedMessage, expectedValues)),
        It.Is<Exception>(e => e == expectedException),
        It.Is<Func<It.IsAnyType, Exception, string>>((o, t) => true)
    ));
}

private static bool MatchesLogValues(object state, string expectedMessage, params KeyValuePair<string, object>[] expectedValues)
{
    const string messageKeyName = "{OriginalFormat}";

    var loggedValues = (IReadOnlyList<KeyValuePair<string, object>>)state;

    return loggedValues.Any(loggedValue => loggedValue.Key == messageKeyName && loggedValue.Value.ToString() == expectedMessage) &&
           expectedValues.All(expectedValue => loggedValues.Any(loggedValue => loggedValue.Key == expectedValue.Key && loggedValue.Value == expectedValue.Value));
}

实际上，我找到了Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions。NullLogger<>，这看起来像是一个完美的解决方案。安装包Microsoft.Extensions.Logging。抽象，然后按照示例配置和使用它:

using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    ...

    services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, NullLoggerFactory>();

    ...
}

using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public class MyClass : IMyClass
{
    public const string ErrorMessageILoggerFactoryIsNull = "ILoggerFactory is null";

    private readonly ILogger<MyClass> logger;

    public MyClass(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
    {
        if (null == loggerFactory)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException(ErrorMessageILoggerFactoryIsNull, (Exception)null);
        }

        this.logger = loggerFactory.CreateLogger<MyClass>();
    }
}

单元测试

//using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
//using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

[TestMethod]
public void SampleTest()
{
    ILoggerFactory doesntDoMuch = new Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions.NullLoggerFactory();
    IMyClass testItem = new MyClass(doesntDoMuch);
    Assert.IsNotNull(testItem);
}   

最简单的解决方案是使用NullLogger。它是Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions的一部分。

没有必要干扰工厂和其他不必要的建设。添加:

ILogger<BlogController> logger = new NullLogger<BlogController>();

使用NullLogger -什么都不做的极简日志记录器。

public interface ILoggingClass
{
   public void LogCritical(Exception exception);
}

public class LoggingClass : ILoggingClass
{
    private readonly ILogger<LoggingClass> logger;

    public LoggingClass(ILogger<LoggingClass> logger) =>
            this.logger = logger;

    public void LogCritical(Exception exception) =>
        this.logger.LogCritical(exception, exception.Message);
}

在测试方法的使用中，

ILogger<LoggingClass> logger = new NullLogger<LoggingClass>();
LoggingClass loggingClass = new LoggingClass(logger);

并将loggingClass传递给服务进行测试。

使用Telerik Just Mock创建记录器的模拟实例:

using Telerik.JustMock;
...
context = new XDbContext(Mock.Create<ILogger<XDbContext>>());