使用一个使用ITestOutputHelper(来自xunit)的自定义记录器来捕获输出和日志。下面是一个只将状态写入输出的小示例。

public class XunitLogger<T> : ILogger<T>, IDisposable
{
    private ITestOutputHelper _output;

    public XunitLogger(ITestOutputHelper output)
    {
        _output = output;
    }
    public void Log<TState>(LogLevel logLevel, EventId eventId, TState state, Exception exception, Func<TState, Exception, string> formatter)
    {
        _output.WriteLine(state.ToString());
    }

    public bool IsEnabled(LogLevel logLevel)
    {
        return true;
    }

    public IDisposable BeginScope<TState>(TState state)
    {
        return this;
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
    }
}

在单元测试中使用它

public class BlogControllerTest
{
  private XunitLogger<BlogController> _logger;

  public BlogControllerTest(ITestOutputHelper output){
    _logger = new XunitLogger<BlogController>(output);
  }

  [Fact]
  public void Index_ReturnAViewResult_WithAListOfBlog()
  {
    var mockRepo = new Mock<IDAO<Blog>>();
    mockRepo.Setup(repo => repo.GetMany(null)).Returns(GetListBlog());
    var controller = new BlogController(_logger,mockRepo.Object);
    // rest
  }
}

只需模拟它以及任何其他依赖:

var mock = new Mock<ILogger<BlogController>>();
ILogger<BlogController> logger = mock.Object;

//or use this short equivalent 
logger = Mock.Of<ILogger<BlogController>>()

var controller = new BlogController(logger);

你可能需要安装Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions包来使用ILogger<T>。

此外，您可以创建一个真正的日志记录器:

var serviceProvider = new ServiceCollection()
    .AddLogging()
    .BuildServiceProvider();

var factory = serviceProvider.GetService<ILoggerFactory>();

var logger = factory.CreateLogger<BlogController>();

仅仅创建一个虚拟的ILogger对于单元测试来说没有多大价值。您还应该验证是否进行了日志记录调用。您可以使用Moq注入一个模拟ILogger，但验证调用可能有点棘手。本文将深入探讨如何使用Moq进行验证。

下面是文章中一个非常简单的例子:

_loggerMock.Verify(l => l.Log(
LogLevel.Information,
It.IsAny<EventId>(),
It.IsAny<It.IsAnyType>(),
It.IsAny<Exception>(),
(Func<It.IsAnyType, Exception, string>)It.IsAny<object>()), Times.Exactly(1));

它验证是否记录了信息消息。但是，如果我们想验证关于消息的更复杂的信息，比如消息模板和命名属性，这就变得更加棘手了:

_loggerMock.Verify
(
    l => l.Log
    (
        //Check the severity level
        LogLevel.Error,
        //This may or may not be relevant to your scenario
        It.IsAny<EventId>(),
        //This is the magical Moq code that exposes internal log processing from the extension methods
        It.Is<It.IsAnyType>((state, t) =>
            //This confirms that the correct log message was sent to the logger. {OriginalFormat} should match the value passed to the logger
            //Note: messages should be retrieved from a service that will probably store the strings in a resource file
            CheckValue(state, LogTest.ErrorMessage, "{OriginalFormat}") &&
            //This confirms that an argument with a key of "recordId" was sent with the correct value
            //In Application Insights, this will turn up in Custom Dimensions
            CheckValue(state, recordId, nameof(recordId))
    ),
    //Confirm the exception type
    It.IsAny<NotImplementedException>(),
    //Accept any valid Func here. The Func is specified by the extension methods
    (Func<It.IsAnyType, Exception, string>)It.IsAny<object>()),
    //Make sure the message was logged the correct number of times
    Times.Exactly(1)
);

我相信您可以用其他模拟框架做同样的事情，但是ILogger接口确保了这很困难。

像其他答案建议的那样，传递模拟ILogger很容易，但是验证调用实际上是对logger进行的突然变得更加困难。原因是大多数调用实际上并不属于ILogger接口本身。

因此，大多数调用都是调用接口唯一Log方法的扩展方法。原因似乎是，如果您只有一个而不是很多重载，那么可以更容易地实现接口，从而归结为相同的方法。

当然，缺点是突然间很难验证呼叫是否已发出，因为您应该验证的呼叫与您所发出的呼叫非常不同。有一些不同的方法可以解决这个问题，我发现用于模拟框架的自定义扩展方法将使其更容易编写。

下面是我用NSubstitute做的一个方法的例子:

public static class LoggerTestingExtensions
{
    public static void LogError(this ILogger logger, string message)
    {
        logger.Log(
            LogLevel.Error,
            0,
            Arg.Is<FormattedLogValues>(v => v.ToString() == message),
            Arg.Any<Exception>(),
            Arg.Any<Func<object, Exception, string>>());
    }

}

下面是它的用法:

_logger.Received(1).LogError("Something bad happened");   

它看起来就像您直接使用了这个方法，这里的技巧是我们的扩展方法获得了优先级，因为它在名称空间上比原来的方法“更接近”，所以它将被使用。

不幸的是，它并没有给出我们想要的100%，即错误消息将不会那么好，因为我们不直接检查字符串，而是检查涉及字符串的lambda，但95%总比没有好:)此外，这种方法将使测试代码

P.S.对于Moq，可以使用为Mock<ILogger<T>>编写扩展方法的方法来验证，以实现类似的结果。

P.P.S.这在。net Core 3中不再工作，查看这个线程了解更多细节:https://github.com/nsubstitute/NSubstitute/issues/597#issuecomment-573742574

使用Telerik Just Mock创建记录器的模拟实例:

using Telerik.JustMock;
...
context = new XDbContext(Mock.Create<ILogger<XDbContext>>());

在@ivan-samygin和@stakx的基础上进一步构建，这里有一些扩展方法，它们也可以匹配Exception和所有日志值(KeyValuePairs)。

这些工作(在我的机器上;))与。net Core 3, Moq 4.13.0和Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions 3.1.0。

/// <summary>
/// Verifies that a Log call has been made, with the given LogLevel, Message and optional KeyValuePairs.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Type of the class for the logger.</typeparam>
/// <param name="loggerMock">The mocked logger class.</param>
/// <param name="expectedLogLevel">The LogLevel to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedMessage">The Message to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedValues">Zero or more KeyValuePairs to verify.</param>
public static void VerifyLog<T>(this Mock<ILogger<T>> loggerMock, LogLevel expectedLogLevel, string expectedMessage, params KeyValuePair<string, object>[] expectedValues)
{
    loggerMock.Verify(mock => mock.Log(
        expectedLogLevel,
        It.IsAny<EventId>(),
        It.Is<It.IsAnyType>((o, t) => MatchesLogValues(o, expectedMessage, expectedValues)),
        It.IsAny<Exception>(),
        It.IsAny<Func<object, Exception, string>>()
        )
    );
}

/// <summary>
/// Verifies that a Log call has been made, with LogLevel.Error, Message, given Exception and optional KeyValuePairs.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Type of the class for the logger.</typeparam>
/// <param name="loggerMock">The mocked logger class.</param>
/// <param name="expectedMessage">The Message to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedException">The Exception to verify.</param>
/// <param name="expectedValues">Zero or more KeyValuePairs to verify.</param>
public static void VerifyLog<T>(this Mock<ILogger<T>> loggerMock, string expectedMessage, Exception expectedException, params KeyValuePair<string, object>[] expectedValues)
{
    loggerMock.Verify(logger => logger.Log(
        LogLevel.Error,
        It.IsAny<EventId>(),
        It.Is<It.IsAnyType>((o, t) => MatchesLogValues(o, expectedMessage, expectedValues)),
        It.Is<Exception>(e => e == expectedException),
        It.Is<Func<It.IsAnyType, Exception, string>>((o, t) => true)
    ));
}

private static bool MatchesLogValues(object state, string expectedMessage, params KeyValuePair<string, object>[] expectedValues)
{
    const string messageKeyName = "{OriginalFormat}";

    var loggedValues = (IReadOnlyList<KeyValuePair<string, object>>)state;

    return loggedValues.Any(loggedValue => loggedValue.Key == messageKeyName && loggedValue.Value.ToString() == expectedMessage) &&
           expectedValues.All(expectedValue => loggedValues.Any(loggedValue => loggedValue.Key == expectedValue.Key && loggedValue.Value == expectedValue.Value));
}