这是我的控制器:

public class BlogController : Controller
{
    private IDAO<Blog> _blogDAO;
    private readonly ILogger<BlogController> _logger;

    public BlogController(ILogger<BlogController> logger, IDAO<Blog> blogDAO)
    {
        this._blogDAO = blogDAO;
        this._logger = logger;
    }
    public IActionResult Index()
    {
        var blogs = this._blogDAO.GetMany();
        this._logger.LogInformation("Index page say hello", new object[0]);
        return View(blogs);
    }
}

正如你所看到的,我有两个依赖项,一个IDAO和一个ILogger

这是我的测试类,我使用xUnit来测试和Moq来创建模拟和存根,我可以很容易地模拟DAO,但使用ILogger,我不知道该做什么,所以我只是传递null并注释掉运行测试时登录控制器的调用。是否有一种方法可以测试,但仍然以某种方式保存日志?

public class BlogControllerTest
{
    [Fact]
    public void Index_ReturnAViewResult_WithAListOfBlog()
    {
        var mockRepo = new Mock<IDAO<Blog>>();
        mockRepo.Setup(repo => repo.GetMany(null)).Returns(GetListBlog());
        var controller = new BlogController(null,mockRepo.Object);

        var result = controller.Index();

        var viewResult = Assert.IsType<ViewResult>(result);
        var model = Assert.IsAssignableFrom<IEnumerable<Blog>>(viewResult.ViewData.Model);
        Assert.Equal(2, model.Count());
    }
}

当前回答

使用一个使用ITestOutputHelper(来自xunit)的自定义记录器来捕获输出和日志。下面是一个只将状态写入输出的小示例。

public class XunitLogger<T> : ILogger<T>, IDisposable
{
    private ITestOutputHelper _output;

    public XunitLogger(ITestOutputHelper output)
    {
        _output = output;
    }
    public void Log<TState>(LogLevel logLevel, EventId eventId, TState state, Exception exception, Func<TState, Exception, string> formatter)
    {
        _output.WriteLine(state.ToString());
    }

    public bool IsEnabled(LogLevel logLevel)
    {
        return true;
    }

    public IDisposable BeginScope<TState>(TState state)
    {
        return this;
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
    }
}

在单元测试中使用它

public class BlogControllerTest
{
  private XunitLogger<BlogController> _logger;

  public BlogControllerTest(ITestOutputHelper output){
    _logger = new XunitLogger<BlogController>(output);
  }

  [Fact]
  public void Index_ReturnAViewResult_WithAListOfBlog()
  {
    var mockRepo = new Mock<IDAO<Blog>>();
    mockRepo.Setup(repo => repo.GetMany(null)).Returns(GetListBlog());
    var controller = new BlogController(_logger,mockRepo.Object);
    // rest
  }
}

其他回答

使用Telerik Just Mock创建记录器的模拟实例:

using Telerik.JustMock;
...
context = new XDbContext(Mock.Create<ILogger<XDbContext>>());

当使用StructureMap / Lamar时:

var c = new Container(_ =>
{
    _.For(typeof(ILogger<>)).Use(typeof(NullLogger<>));
});

文档:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.extensions.logging.abstractions.nulllogger?view=aspnetcore-2.1 http://structuremap.github.io/generics/

实际上,我找到了Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions。NullLogger<>,这看起来像是一个完美的解决方案。安装包Microsoft.Extensions.Logging。抽象,然后按照示例配置和使用它:

using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    ...

    services.AddSingleton<ILoggerFactory, NullLoggerFactory>();

    ...
}
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public class MyClass : IMyClass
{
    public const string ErrorMessageILoggerFactoryIsNull = "ILoggerFactory is null";

    private readonly ILogger<MyClass> logger;

    public MyClass(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
    {
        if (null == loggerFactory)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException(ErrorMessageILoggerFactoryIsNull, (Exception)null);
        }

        this.logger = loggerFactory.CreateLogger<MyClass>();
    }
}

单元测试

//using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
//using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

[TestMethod]
public void SampleTest()
{
    ILoggerFactory doesntDoMuch = new Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions.NullLoggerFactory();
    IMyClass testItem = new MyClass(doesntDoMuch);
    Assert.IsNotNull(testItem);
}   

如果还是实际的。简单的方法在。net core >= 3的测试中输出日志

[Fact]
public void SomeTest()
{
    using var logFactory = LoggerFactory.Create(builder => builder.AddConsole());
    var logger = logFactory.CreateLogger<AccountController>();
    
    var controller = new SomeController(logger);

    var result = controller.SomeActionAsync(new Dto{ ... }).GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}

仅仅创建一个虚拟的ILogger对于单元测试来说没有多大价值。您还应该验证是否进行了日志记录调用。您可以使用Moq注入一个模拟ILogger,但验证调用可能有点棘手。本文将深入探讨如何使用Moq进行验证。

下面是文章中一个非常简单的例子:

_loggerMock.Verify(l => l.Log(
LogLevel.Information,
It.IsAny<EventId>(),
It.IsAny<It.IsAnyType>(),
It.IsAny<Exception>(),
(Func<It.IsAnyType, Exception, string>)It.IsAny<object>()), Times.Exactly(1));

它验证是否记录了信息消息。但是,如果我们想验证关于消息的更复杂的信息,比如消息模板和命名属性,这就变得更加棘手了:

_loggerMock.Verify
(
    l => l.Log
    (
        //Check the severity level
        LogLevel.Error,
        //This may or may not be relevant to your scenario
        It.IsAny<EventId>(),
        //This is the magical Moq code that exposes internal log processing from the extension methods
        It.Is<It.IsAnyType>((state, t) =>
            //This confirms that the correct log message was sent to the logger. {OriginalFormat} should match the value passed to the logger
            //Note: messages should be retrieved from a service that will probably store the strings in a resource file
            CheckValue(state, LogTest.ErrorMessage, "{OriginalFormat}") &&
            //This confirms that an argument with a key of "recordId" was sent with the correct value
            //In Application Insights, this will turn up in Custom Dimensions
            CheckValue(state, recordId, nameof(recordId))
    ),
    //Confirm the exception type
    It.IsAny<NotImplementedException>(),
    //Accept any valid Func here. The Func is specified by the extension methods
    (Func<It.IsAnyType, Exception, string>)It.IsAny<object>()),
    //Make sure the message was logged the correct number of times
    Times.Exactly(1)
);

我相信您可以用其他模拟框架做同样的事情,但是ILogger接口确保了这很困难。