继续学习Android,我读了以下内容:
Question: Does the user have a choice to kill the application
unless we put a menu option in to kill it? If no such option exists,
how does the user terminate the application?
Answer: (Romain Guy): The user doesn't, the system handles this automatically. That's what the activity lifecycle (especially onPause/onStop/onDestroy) is for. No matter what you do, do not put a "quit" or "exit" application button. It is useless with Android's application model. This is also contrary to how core applications work.
呵呵,我在Android世界里每走一步都会遇到一些问题=(
显然,你不能在Android中退出应用程序(但Android系统可以随时完全销毁你的应用程序)。这是怎么回事?我开始认为这是不可能写一个应用程序的功能作为“正常的应用程序”-用户可以退出应用程序时,他/她决定这么做。这不应该依靠操作系统来完成。
我正在尝试创建的应用程序不是Android市场的应用程序。它不是一个被大众“广泛使用”的应用程序,它是一个将在非常狭窄的商业领域使用的商业应用程序。
我其实很期待为Android平台开发,因为它解决了Windows Mobile和。net中存在的许多问题。然而,上周对我来说有点令人失望……我希望我不必放弃Android,但它现在看起来不太好=(
有办法让我真的退出应用程序吗?
这很简单。只要遵循我要告诉你的这些指示:
比如你有多个活动,从一个活动到另一个活动。你可能会像这样使用intent:
Intent i1 = new Intent(this, AnotherActivity);
startActivity(i1)
你只需要添加finish();例如,从头到尾在每个活动上启动intent活动后,
Intent i1=new Intent(this, AnotherActivity);
startActivity(i1)
finish();
所以当你点击退出按钮时使用的是finish()或System.exit(0)必须完全关闭你的应用程序。
我认为关键是没有必要退出应用程序,除非你的软件有问题。Android会在用户不使用该应用且设备需要更多内存时退出该应用。如果你有一个需要在后台运行服务的应用程序,你可能需要一种方法来关闭服务。
For example, Google Listen continues to play podcast when the app is not visible. But there is always the pause button to turn the podcast off when the user is done with it. If I remember correctly, Listen, even puts a shortcut in the notification bar so you can always get to the pause button quickly. Another example is an app like a twitter app for instance which constantly polls a service on the internet. These types of apps should really allow the user to choose how often to poll the server, or whether even to poll in a background thread.
如果你需要在退出时运行的代码,你可以根据需要重写onPause(), onStop()或onDestroy()。
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Activity.html#ActivityLifecycle
我同意泰德的观点。我明白退出应用程序不是
“Android方式”,但它似乎不应该被排除。在这里
您可能需要一个真正的应用程序出口(不是
只是活动):
The user might want some control over which app gets killed in the
case of low memory. If important app A is running in the background,
then you might like to exit app B when you are done with it so
that app A doesn't get killed by the operating system.
If your application has sensitive data cached in memory, you might
like to kill the app so that a virus/worm/rogue app can't get at it. I
know the security model is supposed to prevent that, but just in case...
If your application uses resources (like network, CPU, sensors, etc.)
that could adversely affect the phone, then one way of ensuring that
those resources are freed up is to exit the application. I understand
that well-behaved apps should free up resources when they are not needed. But again, exiting the application seems like a reasonable way of ensuring that.
每次当你通过意图移动到下一页时,使用:
`YourActivityname.this.finish()`;
例子:
Intent intent = new Intent(getApplicationContext(), SMS.class);
startActivity(intent);
MainActivity.this.finish();
因此,没有活动将在后台运行,当你想退出你的应用程序,使用:
MainActivity.this.finish();
android.os.Process.killProcess(android.os.Process.myPid());
System.exit(0);
getParent().finish();
这种退出对我来说就像一个魅力:)