解决这个问题的一个好方法是首先编写获得一个结果所需的代码，然后合并线程代码来并行化应用程序。

In a perfect world this would simply mean simultaneously starting 100,000 threads which output their results into a dictionary or list for later processing, but in practice you are limited in how many parallel HTTP requests you can issue in this fashion. Locally, you have limits in how many sockets you can open concurrently, how many threads of execution your Python interpreter will allow. Remotely, you may be limited in the number of simultaneous connections if all the requests are against one server, or many. These limitations will probably necessitate that you write the script in such a way as to only poll a small fraction of the URLs at any one time (100, as another poster mentioned, is probably a decent thread pool size, although you may find that you can successfully deploy many more).

您可以遵循以下设计模式来解决上述问题:

Start a thread which launches new request threads until the number of currently running threads (you can track them via threading.active_count() or by pushing the thread objects into a data structure) is >= your maximum number of simultaneous requests (say 100), then sleeps for a short timeout. This thread should terminate when there is are no more URLs to process. Thus, the thread will keep waking up, launching new threads, and sleeping until your are finished. Have the request threads store their results in some data structure for later retrieval and output. If the structure you are storing the results in is a list or dict in CPython, you can safely append or insert unique items from your threads without locks, but if you write to a file or require in more complex cross-thread data interaction you should use a mutual exclusion lock to protect this state from corruption.

我建议您使用threading模块。您可以使用它来启动和跟踪正在运行的线程。Python的线程支持是完全的，但是对问题的描述表明它完全满足了您的需求。

最后，如果您希望看到用Python编写的并行网络应用程序的相当简单的应用程序，请查看ssh.py。它是一个小型库，使用Python线程并行处理许多SSH连接。该设计非常接近您的需求，您可能会发现它是一个很好的资源。

自从2010年这篇文章发布以来，事情发生了很大的变化，我还没有尝试过所有其他的答案，但我尝试了一些，我发现使用python3.6对我来说这是最好的。

在AWS上运行时，我每秒可以获取大约150个独特的域名。

import concurrent.futures
import requests
import time

out = []
CONNECTIONS = 100
TIMEOUT = 5

tlds = open('../data/sample_1k.txt').read().splitlines()
urls = ['http://{}'.format(x) for x in tlds[1:]]

def load_url(url, timeout):
    ans = requests.head(url, timeout=timeout)
    return ans.status_code

with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=CONNECTIONS) as executor:
    future_to_url = (executor.submit(load_url, url, TIMEOUT) for url in urls)
    time1 = time.time()
    for future in concurrent.futures.as_completed(future_to_url):
        try:
            data = future.result()
        except Exception as exc:
            data = str(type(exc))
        finally:
            out.append(data)

            print(str(len(out)),end="\r")

    time2 = time.time()

print(f'Took {time2-time1:.2f} s')

对于您的情况，线程可能会做的技巧，因为您可能会花费大部分时间等待响应。标准库中有一些有用的模块，如Queue，可能会有所帮助。

我以前做过类似的并行下载文件的事情，对我来说已经足够好了，但它不是你所说的那种规模。

如果您的任务对cpu的限制更大，您可能需要考虑multiprocessing模块，它将允许您利用更多的cpu /内核/线程(更多的进程不会相互阻塞，因为锁定是每个进程)

解决这个问题的一个好方法是首先编写获得一个结果所需的代码，然后合并线程代码来并行化应用程序。

In a perfect world this would simply mean simultaneously starting 100,000 threads which output their results into a dictionary or list for later processing, but in practice you are limited in how many parallel HTTP requests you can issue in this fashion. Locally, you have limits in how many sockets you can open concurrently, how many threads of execution your Python interpreter will allow. Remotely, you may be limited in the number of simultaneous connections if all the requests are against one server, or many. These limitations will probably necessitate that you write the script in such a way as to only poll a small fraction of the URLs at any one time (100, as another poster mentioned, is probably a decent thread pool size, although you may find that you can successfully deploy many more).

您可以遵循以下设计模式来解决上述问题:

Start a thread which launches new request threads until the number of currently running threads (you can track them via threading.active_count() or by pushing the thread objects into a data structure) is >= your maximum number of simultaneous requests (say 100), then sleeps for a short timeout. This thread should terminate when there is are no more URLs to process. Thus, the thread will keep waking up, launching new threads, and sleeping until your are finished. Have the request threads store their results in some data structure for later retrieval and output. If the structure you are storing the results in is a list or dict in CPython, you can safely append or insert unique items from your threads without locks, but if you write to a file or require in more complex cross-thread data interaction you should use a mutual exclusion lock to protect this state from corruption.

我建议您使用threading模块。您可以使用它来启动和跟踪正在运行的线程。Python的线程支持是完全的，但是对问题的描述表明它完全满足了您的需求。

最后，如果您希望看到用Python编写的并行网络应用程序的相当简单的应用程序，请查看ssh.py。它是一个小型库，使用Python线程并行处理许多SSH连接。该设计非常接近您的需求，您可能会发现它是一个很好的资源。

一个使用tornado的异步网络库解决方案

from tornado import ioloop, httpclient

i = 0

def handle_request(response):
    print(response.code)
    global i
    i -= 1
    if i == 0:
        ioloop.IOLoop.instance().stop()

http_client = httpclient.AsyncHTTPClient()
for url in open('urls.txt'):
    i += 1
    http_client.fetch(url.strip(), handle_request, method='HEAD')
ioloop.IOLoop.instance().start()

这段代码使用非阻塞网络I/O，没有任何限制。它可以扩展到数万个打开的连接。它将在单个线程中运行，但比任何线程解决方案都要快。签出非阻塞I/O

使用线程池是一个很好的选择，这将使这相当容易。不幸的是，python并没有一个标准库来简化线程池。但这里有一个不错的图书馆，你应该开始: http://www.chrisarndt.de/projects/threadpool/

来自他们网站的代码示例:

pool = ThreadPool(poolsize)
requests = makeRequests(some_callable, list_of_args, callback)
[pool.putRequest(req) for req in requests]
pool.wait()

希望这能有所帮助。