用法:二进制(00010001);

int二进制(int a){ Int b = 0;

for (int i = 0;i < 8;i++){
    b += a % 10 << i;
    a = a / 10;
}

return b;

}

c++提供了一个名为std::bitset的标准模板。如果你喜欢，可以试试。

C语言没有用于纯二进制数的原生表示法。这里最好是八进制(例如07777)或十六进制(例如0xfff)。

你可以尝试使用bool类型的数组:

bool i[8] = {0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1}

从c++ 14开始，你可以使用二进制字面值，现在它们是语言的一部分:

unsigned char a = 0b00110011;

一些编译器(通常是微控制器的编译器)有一个特殊的功能，通过数字前面的前缀“0b…”来识别二进制数字，尽管大多数编译器(C/ c++标准)没有这样的功能，如果是这样的话，这里是我的替代解决方案:

#define B_0000    0
#define B_0001    1
#define B_0010    2
#define B_0011    3
#define B_0100    4
#define B_0101    5
#define B_0110    6
#define B_0111    7
#define B_1000    8
#define B_1001    9
#define B_1010    a
#define B_1011    b
#define B_1100    c
#define B_1101    d
#define B_1110    e
#define B_1111    f

#define _B2H(bits)    B_##bits
#define B2H(bits)    _B2H(bits)
#define _HEX(n)        0x##n
#define HEX(n)        _HEX(n)
#define _CCAT(a,b)    a##b
#define CCAT(a,b)   _CCAT(a,b)

#define BYTE(a,b)        HEX( CCAT(B2H(a),B2H(b)) )
#define WORD(a,b,c,d)    HEX( CCAT(CCAT(B2H(a),B2H(b)),CCAT(B2H(c),B2H(d))) )
#define DWORD(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)    HEX( CCAT(CCAT(CCAT(B2H(a),B2H(b)),CCAT(B2H(c),B2H(d))),CCAT(CCAT(B2H(e),B2H(f)),CCAT(B2H(g),B2H(h)))) )

// Using example
char b = BYTE(0100,0001); // Equivalent to b = 65; or b = 'A'; or b = 0x41;
unsigned int w = WORD(1101,1111,0100,0011); // Equivalent to w = 57155; or w = 0xdf43;
unsigned long int dw = DWORD(1101,1111,0100,0011,1111,1101,0010,1000); //Equivalent to dw = 3745774888; or dw = 0xdf43fd28;

缺点(不是什么大缺点):

二进制数必须按4 × 4分组; 二进制字面值只能是无符号整数;

优点:

Total preprocessor driven, not spending processor time in pointless operations (like "?.. :..", "<<", "+") to the executable program (it may be performed hundred of times in the final application); It works "mainly in C" compilers and C++ as well (template+enum solution works only in C++ compilers); It has only the limitation of "longness" for expressing "literal constant" values. There would have been earlyish longness limitation (usually 8 bits: 0-255) if one had expressed constant values by parsing resolve of "enum solution" (usually 255 = reach enum definition limit), differently, "literal constant" limitations, in the compiler allows greater numbers; Some other solutions demand exaggerated number of constant definitions (too many defines in my opinion) including long or several header files (in most cases not easily readable and understandable, and make the project become unnecessarily confused and extended, like that using "BOOST_BINARY()"); Simplicity of the solution: easily readable, understandable and adjustable for other cases (could be extended for grouping 8 by 8 too);