似乎没有函数可以简单地计算numpy/scipy的移动平均值，这导致了复杂的解决方案。
我的问题有两个方面:
用numpy(正确地)实现移动平均的最简单方法是什么? 既然这似乎不是小事，而且容易出错，有没有一个很好的理由不包括电池在这种情况下?
当前回答
这里有许多实现这一点的方法，以及一些基准测试。最好的方法是使用来自其他库的优化代码。瓶颈。Move_mean方法可能是最好的方法。scipy。卷积方法也非常快，可扩展，并且语法和概念简单，但是对于非常大的窗口值不能很好地扩展。numpy。如果你需要一个纯numpy方法，Cumsum方法是很好的。
注意:其中一些(例如:瓶颈。move_mean)不是居中的，并且会转移你的数据。
import numpy as np
import scipy as sci
import scipy.signal as sig
import pandas as pd
import bottleneck as bn
import time as time
def rollavg_direct(a,n):
'Direct "for" loop'
assert n%2==1
b = a*0.0
for i in range(len(a)) :
b[i]=a[max(i-n//2,0):min(i+n//2+1,len(a))].mean()
return b
def rollavg_comprehension(a,n):
'List comprehension'
assert n%2==1
r,N = int(n/2),len(a)
return np.array([a[max(i-r,0):min(i+r+1,N)].mean() for i in range(N)])
def rollavg_convolve(a,n):
'scipy.convolve'
assert n%2==1
return sci.convolve(a,np.ones(n,dtype='float')/n, 'same')[n//2:-n//2+1]
def rollavg_convolve_edges(a,n):
'scipy.convolve, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
return sci.convolve(a,np.ones(n,dtype='float'), 'same')/sci.convolve(np.ones(len(a)),np.ones(n), 'same')
def rollavg_cumsum(a,n):
'numpy.cumsum'
assert n%2==1
cumsum_vec = np.cumsum(np.insert(a, 0, 0))
return (cumsum_vec[n:] - cumsum_vec[:-n]) / n
def rollavg_cumsum_edges(a,n):
'numpy.cumsum, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
N = len(a)
cumsum_vec = np.cumsum(np.insert(np.pad(a,(n-1,n-1),'constant'), 0, 0))
d = np.hstack((np.arange(n//2+1,n),np.ones(N-n)*n,np.arange(n,n//2,-1)))
return (cumsum_vec[n+n//2:-n//2+1] - cumsum_vec[n//2:-n-n//2]) / d
def rollavg_roll(a,n):
'Numpy array rolling'
assert n%2==1
N = len(a)
rolling_idx = np.mod((N-1)*np.arange(n)[:,None] + np.arange(N), N)
return a[rolling_idx].mean(axis=0)[n-1:]
def rollavg_roll_edges(a,n):
# see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42101082/fast-numpy-roll
'Numpy array rolling, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
a = np.pad(a,(0,n-1-n//2), 'constant')*np.ones(n)[:,None]
m = a.shape[1]
idx = np.mod((m-1)*np.arange(n)[:,None] + np.arange(m), m) # Rolling index
out = a[np.arange(-n//2,n//2)[:,None], idx]
d = np.hstack((np.arange(1,n),np.ones(m-2*n+1+n//2)*n,np.arange(n,n//2,-1)))
return (out.sum(axis=0)/d)[n//2:]
def rollavg_pandas(a,n):
'Pandas rolling average'
return pd.DataFrame(a).rolling(n, center=True, min_periods=1).mean().to_numpy()
def rollavg_bottlneck(a,n):
'bottleneck.move_mean'
return bn.move_mean(a, window=n, min_count=1)
N = 10**6
a = np.random.rand(N)
functions = [rollavg_direct, rollavg_comprehension, rollavg_convolve,
rollavg_convolve_edges, rollavg_cumsum, rollavg_cumsum_edges,
rollavg_pandas, rollavg_bottlneck, rollavg_roll, rollavg_roll_edges]
print('Small window (n=3)')
%load_ext memory_profiler
for f in functions :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%timeit b=f(a,3)
print('\nLarge window (n=1001)')
for f in functions[0:-2] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%timeit b=f(a,1001)
print('\nMemory\n')
print('Small window (n=3)')
N = 10**7
a = np.random.rand(N)
%load_ext memory_profiler
for f in functions[2:] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%memit b=f(a,3)
print('\nLarge window (n=1001)')
for f in functions[2:-2] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%memit b=f(a,1001)
定时，小窗口(n=3)
Direct "for" loop :
4.14 s ± 23.7 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
List comprehension :
3.96 s ± 27.9 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
scipy.convolve :
1.07 ms ± 26.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each)
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
4.68 ms ± 9.69 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum :
5.31 ms ± 5.11 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
8.52 ms ± 11.1 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Pandas rolling average :
9.85 ms ± 9.63 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
bottleneck.move_mean :
1.3 ms ± 12.2 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Numpy array rolling :
31.3 ms ± 91.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
Numpy array rolling, edge handling :
61.1 ms ± 55.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
定时，大窗口(n=1001)
Direct "for" loop :
4.67 s ± 34 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
List comprehension :
4.46 s ± 14.6 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
scipy.convolve :
103 ms ± 165 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
272 ms ± 1.23 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
numpy.cumsum :
5.19 ms ± 12.4 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
8.7 ms ± 11.5 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Pandas rolling average :
9.67 ms ± 199 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
bottleneck.move_mean :
1.31 ms ± 15.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
内存，小窗口(n=3)
The memory_profiler extension is already loaded. To reload it, use:
%reload_ext memory_profiler
scipy.convolve :
peak memory: 362.66 MiB, increment: 73.61 MiB
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
peak memory: 510.24 MiB, increment: 221.19 MiB
numpy.cumsum :
peak memory: 441.81 MiB, increment: 152.76 MiB
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
peak memory: 518.14 MiB, increment: 228.84 MiB
Pandas rolling average :
peak memory: 449.34 MiB, increment: 160.02 MiB
bottleneck.move_mean :
peak memory: 374.17 MiB, increment: 75.54 MiB
Numpy array rolling :
peak memory: 661.29 MiB, increment: 362.65 MiB
Numpy array rolling, edge handling :
peak memory: 1111.25 MiB, increment: 812.61 MiB
内存，大窗口(n=1001)
scipy.convolve :
peak memory: 370.62 MiB, increment: 71.83 MiB
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
peak memory: 521.98 MiB, increment: 223.18 MiB
numpy.cumsum :
peak memory: 451.32 MiB, increment: 152.52 MiB
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
peak memory: 527.51 MiB, increment: 228.71 MiB
Pandas rolling average :
peak memory: 451.25 MiB, increment: 152.50 MiB
bottleneck.move_mean :
peak memory: 374.64 MiB, increment: 75.85 MiB
其他回答
实际上，我想要一个稍微不同于公认答案的行为。我正在为sklearn管道构建一个移动平均特征提取器，因此我要求移动平均的输出与输入具有相同的维数。我想要的是让移动平均假设级数保持不变，即[1,2,3,4,5]与窗口2的移动平均将得到[1.5,2.5,3.5,4.5,5.0]。
对于列向量(我的用例)我们得到
def moving_average_col(X, n):
z2 = np.cumsum(np.pad(X, ((n,0),(0,0)), 'constant', constant_values=0), axis=0)
z1 = np.cumsum(np.pad(X, ((0,n),(0,0)), 'constant', constant_values=X[-1]), axis=0)
return (z1-z2)[(n-1):-1]/n
对于数组
def moving_average_array(X, n):
z2 = np.cumsum(np.pad(X, (n,0), 'constant', constant_values=0))
z1 = np.cumsum(np.pad(X, (0,n), 'constant', constant_values=X[-1]))
return (z1-z2)[(n-1):-1]/n
当然，不必假设填充值为常数，但在大多数情况下这样做应该足够了。
这里有许多实现这一点的方法，以及一些基准测试。最好的方法是使用来自其他库的优化代码。瓶颈。Move_mean方法可能是最好的方法。scipy。卷积方法也非常快，可扩展，并且语法和概念简单，但是对于非常大的窗口值不能很好地扩展。numpy。如果你需要一个纯numpy方法，Cumsum方法是很好的。
注意:其中一些(例如:瓶颈。move_mean)不是居中的，并且会转移你的数据。
import numpy as np
import scipy as sci
import scipy.signal as sig
import pandas as pd
import bottleneck as bn
import time as time
def rollavg_direct(a,n):
'Direct "for" loop'
assert n%2==1
b = a*0.0
for i in range(len(a)) :
b[i]=a[max(i-n//2,0):min(i+n//2+1,len(a))].mean()
return b
def rollavg_comprehension(a,n):
'List comprehension'
assert n%2==1
r,N = int(n/2),len(a)
return np.array([a[max(i-r,0):min(i+r+1,N)].mean() for i in range(N)])
def rollavg_convolve(a,n):
'scipy.convolve'
assert n%2==1
return sci.convolve(a,np.ones(n,dtype='float')/n, 'same')[n//2:-n//2+1]
def rollavg_convolve_edges(a,n):
'scipy.convolve, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
return sci.convolve(a,np.ones(n,dtype='float'), 'same')/sci.convolve(np.ones(len(a)),np.ones(n), 'same')
def rollavg_cumsum(a,n):
'numpy.cumsum'
assert n%2==1
cumsum_vec = np.cumsum(np.insert(a, 0, 0))
return (cumsum_vec[n:] - cumsum_vec[:-n]) / n
def rollavg_cumsum_edges(a,n):
'numpy.cumsum, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
N = len(a)
cumsum_vec = np.cumsum(np.insert(np.pad(a,(n-1,n-1),'constant'), 0, 0))
d = np.hstack((np.arange(n//2+1,n),np.ones(N-n)*n,np.arange(n,n//2,-1)))
return (cumsum_vec[n+n//2:-n//2+1] - cumsum_vec[n//2:-n-n//2]) / d
def rollavg_roll(a,n):
'Numpy array rolling'
assert n%2==1
N = len(a)
rolling_idx = np.mod((N-1)*np.arange(n)[:,None] + np.arange(N), N)
return a[rolling_idx].mean(axis=0)[n-1:]
def rollavg_roll_edges(a,n):
# see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42101082/fast-numpy-roll
'Numpy array rolling, edge handling'
assert n%2==1
a = np.pad(a,(0,n-1-n//2), 'constant')*np.ones(n)[:,None]
m = a.shape[1]
idx = np.mod((m-1)*np.arange(n)[:,None] + np.arange(m), m) # Rolling index
out = a[np.arange(-n//2,n//2)[:,None], idx]
d = np.hstack((np.arange(1,n),np.ones(m-2*n+1+n//2)*n,np.arange(n,n//2,-1)))
return (out.sum(axis=0)/d)[n//2:]
def rollavg_pandas(a,n):
'Pandas rolling average'
return pd.DataFrame(a).rolling(n, center=True, min_periods=1).mean().to_numpy()
def rollavg_bottlneck(a,n):
'bottleneck.move_mean'
return bn.move_mean(a, window=n, min_count=1)
N = 10**6
a = np.random.rand(N)
functions = [rollavg_direct, rollavg_comprehension, rollavg_convolve,
rollavg_convolve_edges, rollavg_cumsum, rollavg_cumsum_edges,
rollavg_pandas, rollavg_bottlneck, rollavg_roll, rollavg_roll_edges]
print('Small window (n=3)')
%load_ext memory_profiler
for f in functions :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%timeit b=f(a,3)
print('\nLarge window (n=1001)')
for f in functions[0:-2] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%timeit b=f(a,1001)
print('\nMemory\n')
print('Small window (n=3)')
N = 10**7
a = np.random.rand(N)
%load_ext memory_profiler
for f in functions[2:] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%memit b=f(a,3)
print('\nLarge window (n=1001)')
for f in functions[2:-2] :
print('\n'+f.__doc__+ ' : ')
%memit b=f(a,1001)
定时，小窗口(n=3)
Direct "for" loop :
4.14 s ± 23.7 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
List comprehension :
3.96 s ± 27.9 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
scipy.convolve :
1.07 ms ± 26.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each)
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
4.68 ms ± 9.69 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum :
5.31 ms ± 5.11 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
8.52 ms ± 11.1 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Pandas rolling average :
9.85 ms ± 9.63 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
bottleneck.move_mean :
1.3 ms ± 12.2 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Numpy array rolling :
31.3 ms ± 91.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
Numpy array rolling, edge handling :
61.1 ms ± 55.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
定时，大窗口(n=1001)
Direct "for" loop :
4.67 s ± 34 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
List comprehension :
4.46 s ± 14.6 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
scipy.convolve :
103 ms ± 165 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
272 ms ± 1.23 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
numpy.cumsum :
5.19 ms ± 12.4 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
8.7 ms ± 11.5 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Pandas rolling average :
9.67 ms ± 199 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
bottleneck.move_mean :
1.31 ms ± 15.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
内存，小窗口(n=3)
The memory_profiler extension is already loaded. To reload it, use:
%reload_ext memory_profiler
scipy.convolve :
peak memory: 362.66 MiB, increment: 73.61 MiB
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
peak memory: 510.24 MiB, increment: 221.19 MiB
numpy.cumsum :
peak memory: 441.81 MiB, increment: 152.76 MiB
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
peak memory: 518.14 MiB, increment: 228.84 MiB
Pandas rolling average :
peak memory: 449.34 MiB, increment: 160.02 MiB
bottleneck.move_mean :
peak memory: 374.17 MiB, increment: 75.54 MiB
Numpy array rolling :
peak memory: 661.29 MiB, increment: 362.65 MiB
Numpy array rolling, edge handling :
peak memory: 1111.25 MiB, increment: 812.61 MiB
内存，大窗口(n=1001)
scipy.convolve :
peak memory: 370.62 MiB, increment: 71.83 MiB
scipy.convolve, edge handling :
peak memory: 521.98 MiB, increment: 223.18 MiB
numpy.cumsum :
peak memory: 451.32 MiB, increment: 152.52 MiB
numpy.cumsum, edge handling :
peak memory: 527.51 MiB, increment: 228.71 MiB
Pandas rolling average :
peak memory: 451.25 MiB, increment: 152.50 MiB
bottleneck.move_mean :
peak memory: 374.64 MiB, increment: 75.85 MiB
如果你只想要一个简单的非加权移动平均，你可以很容易地用np实现它。cumsum，可能比基于FFT的方法更快:
修正了Bean在代码中发现的偏离一的错误索引。编辑
def moving_average(a, n=3) :
ret = np.cumsum(a, dtype=float)
ret[n:] = ret[n:] - ret[:-n]
return ret[n - 1:] / n
>>> a = np.arange(20)
>>> moving_average(a)
array([ 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11.,
12., 13., 14., 15., 16., 17., 18.])
>>> moving_average(a, n=4)
array([ 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5,
10.5, 11.5, 12.5, 13.5, 14.5, 15.5, 16.5, 17.5])
所以我猜答案是:它真的很容易实现，也许numpy已经有了一些专门的功能。
所有的答案似乎都集中在预先计算的列表的情况下。对于实际运行的用例，数字一个接一个地进来，这里有一个简单的类，它提供了对最后N个值求平均的服务:
import numpy as np
class RunningAverage():
def __init__(self, stack_size):
self.stack = [0 for _ in range(stack_size)]
self.ptr = 0
self.full_cycle = False
def add(self,value):
self.stack[self.ptr] = value
self.ptr += 1
if self.ptr == len(self.stack):
self.full_cycle = True
self.ptr = 0
def get_avg(self):
if self.full_cycle:
return np.mean(self.stack)
else:
return np.mean(self.stack[:self.ptr])
用法:
N = 50 # size of the averaging window
run_avg = RunningAverage(N)
for i in range(1000):
value = <my computation>
run_avg.add(value)
if i % 20 ==0: # print once in 20 iters:
print(f'the average value is {run_avg.get_avg()}')
如果你已经有一个已知大小的数组
import numpy as np
M=np.arange(12)
avg=[]
i=0
while i<len(M)-2: #for n point average len(M) - (n-1)
avg.append((M[i]+M[i+1]+M[i+2])/3) #n is denominator
i+=1
print(avg)
推荐文章
- 如何检查一个对象是否是python中的生成器对象?
- 如何从Python包内读取(静态)文件?
- 如何计算一个逻辑sigmoid函数在Python?
- python: SyntaxError: EOL扫描字符串文字
- Pipenv:命令未找到
- 根据Pandas中的另一列提取列值
- virtualenv和pyenv是什么关系?
- 如何正确地设置和拆除带有测试的pytest类?
- 为什么我得到“Pickle - EOFError: run out of input”读取一个空文件?
- 替换pandas数据框架中的列值
- random.seed():它做什么?
- 如何使用PyCharm中安装的包?
- 我如何得到一个Flask请求的url的不同部分?
- 弗拉斯克什么时候应该。G被使用?
- 如何计算滚动/移动平均使用python + NumPy / SciPy?
