正如我已经回答过的那样,是的,在Python中有一个特纳里操作员:

<expression 1> if <condition> else <expression 2>

在许多情况下, < 表达 1> 也被用作 Boolean 评估的 < 条件>. 然后您可以使用短循环评估。

a = 0
b = 1

# Instead of this:
x = a if a else b
# Evaluates as 'a if bool(a) else b'

# You could use short-circuit evaluation:
x = a or b

短循环评估的一个大专业是链接超过两个表达式的可能性:

x = a or b or c or d or e

当与功能工作时,它在细节上更不同:

# Evaluating functions:
def foo(x):
    print('foo executed')
    return x


def bar(y):
    print('bar executed')
    return y


def blubb(z):
    print('blubb executed')
    return z


# Ternary Operator expression 1 equals to False
print(foo(0) if foo(0) else bar(1))
''' foo and bar are executed once
foo executed
bar executed
1
'''

# Ternary Operator expression 1 equals to True
print(foo(2) if foo(2) else bar(3))
''' foo is executed twice!
foo executed
foo executed
2
'''

# Short-circuit evaluation second equals to True
print(foo(0) or bar(1) or blubb(2))
''' blubb is not executed
foo executed
bar executed
1
'''

# Short-circuit evaluation third equals to True
print(foo(0) or bar(0) or blubb(2))
'''
foo executed
bar executed
blubb executed
2
'''

# Short-circuit evaluation all equal to False
print(foo(0) or bar(0) or blubb(0))
''' Result is 0 (from blubb(0)) because no value equals to True
foo executed
bar executed
blubb executed
0
'''

PS:当然,一个短循环评估不是一个电路运营商,但经常在短循环足够的情况下使用电路,它具有更好的可读性,可以连锁。

模拟 Python Ternary 操作器。

例如

a, b, x, y = 1, 2, 'a greather than b', 'b greater than a'
result = (lambda:y, lambda:x)[a > b]()

出口:

'b greater than a'

你可以把它分成一个<unk>子:

(falseValue, trueValue)[test]

测试需要返回真实或虚假. 它可能更安全地总是执行它如下:

(falseValue, trueValue)[test == True]

或者您可以使用内置的 bool() 来确保 Boolean 值:

(falseValue, trueValue)[bool(<expression>)]

一个替代Python的条件表达

"yes" if boolean else "no"

是如下:

{True: "yes", False: "no"}[boolean]

有下列好延伸:

{True: "yes", False: "no", None: "maybe"}[boolean_or_none]

最短的替代品

("no", "yes")[boolean]

因为它是以子类(bool, int)为作用。

注意,但是:替代

yes() if boolean else no()

不是

(no(), yes())[boolean]  # bad: BOTH no() and yes() are called

但

(no, yes)[boolean]()

這工作很好,只要沒有,是的,應該用相同的數字呼叫。

yes("ok") if boolean else no()  # (1)

或在

yes("ok") if boolean else no("sorry")  # (2)

因此,相似的替代品既不存在(一)又几乎不可行(二)。(在罕见的情况下,根据背景,某种类似的

msg = ("sorry", "ok")[boolean]
(no, yes)[boolean](msg)

可以有意义( )

谢谢Radek Rojík的评论

我发现默认的Python合成val = a if cond other b cumbersome,所以有时我这样做:

iif = lambda (cond, a, b): a if cond else b
# So I can then use it like:
val = iif(cond, a, b)

当然,它有一个缺点,总是评估双方(a和b),但合成对我来说更清楚。

连接多个运营商的方式:

f = lambda x,y: 'greater' if x > y else 'less' if y > x else 'equal'

array = [(0,0),(0,1),(1,0),(1,1)]

for a in array:
  x, y = a[0], a[1]
  print(f(x,y))

# Output is:
#   equal,
#   less,
#   greater,
#   equal