如果你想拆分字符串，同时通过regex保留分隔符，而不捕获组:

def finditer_with_separators(regex, s):
    matches = []
    prev_end = 0
    for match in regex.finditer(s):
        match_start = match.start()
        if (prev_end != 0 or match_start > 0) and match_start != prev_end:
            matches.append(s[prev_end:match.start()])
        matches.append(match.group())
        prev_end = match.end()
    if prev_end < len(s):
        matches.append(s[prev_end:])
    return matches

regex = re.compile(r"[\(\)]")
matches = finditer_with_separators(regex, s)

如果假设regex被封装到捕获组中:

def split_with_separators(regex, s):
    matches = list(filter(None, regex.split(s)))
    return matches

regex = re.compile(r"([\(\)])")
matches = split_with_separators(regex, s)

这两种方法也将删除空组，在大多数情况下是无用和恼人的。

之前发布的一些答案，会重复分隔符，或者有一些我在自己的情况下遇到的其他错误。你可以使用这个函数:

def split_and_keep_delimiter(input, delimiter):
    result      = list()
    idx         = 0
    while delimiter in input:
        idx     = input.index(delimiter);
        result.append(input[0:idx+len(delimiter)])
        input = input[idx+len(delimiter):]
    result.append(input)
    return result

如果你想拆分字符串，同时通过regex保留分隔符，而不捕获组:

def finditer_with_separators(regex, s):
    matches = []
    prev_end = 0
    for match in regex.finditer(s):
        match_start = match.start()
        if (prev_end != 0 or match_start > 0) and match_start != prev_end:
            matches.append(s[prev_end:match.start()])
        matches.append(match.group())
        prev_end = match.end()
    if prev_end < len(s):
        matches.append(s[prev_end:])
    return matches

regex = re.compile(r"[\(\)]")
matches = finditer_with_separators(regex, s)

如果假设regex被封装到捕获组中:

def split_with_separators(regex, s):
    matches = list(filter(None, regex.split(s)))
    return matches

regex = re.compile(r"([\(\)])")
matches = split_with_separators(regex, s)

这两种方法也将删除空组，在大多数情况下是无用和恼人的。

re.split的文档中提到:

根据出现的模式拆分字符串。如果捕获 括号是在模式中使用的，然后是文本中的所有组 模式也作为结果列表的一部分返回。

所以你只需要用一个捕获组来包装分隔符:

>>> re.split('(\W)', 'foo/bar spam\neggs')
['foo', '/', 'bar', ' ', 'spam', '\n', 'eggs']

另一个在Python 3上工作良好的非正则表达式解决方案

# Split strings and keep separator
test_strings = ['<Hello>', 'Hi', '<Hi> <Planet>', '<', '']

def split_and_keep(s, sep):
   if not s: return [''] # consistent with string.split()

   # Find replacement character that is not used in string
   # i.e. just use the highest available character plus one
   # Note: This fails if ord(max(s)) = 0x10FFFF (ValueError)
   p=chr(ord(max(s))+1) 

   return s.replace(sep, sep+p).split(p)

for s in test_strings:
   print(split_and_keep(s, '<'))


# If the unicode limit is reached it will fail explicitly
unicode_max_char = chr(1114111)
ridiculous_string = '<Hello>'+unicode_max_char+'<World>'
print(split_and_keep(ridiculous_string, '<'))

我发现这种基于生成器的方法更令人满意:

def split_keep(string, sep):
    """Usage:
    >>> list(split_keep("a.b.c.d", "."))
    ['a.', 'b.', 'c.', 'd']
    """
    start = 0
    while True:
        end = string.find(sep, start) + 1
        if end == 0:
            break
        yield string[start:end]
        start = end
    yield string[start:]

它避免了需要找出正确的正则表达式，而在理论上应该相当便宜。它不创建新的字符串对象，并将大部分迭代工作委托给高效的find方法。

．.． 在Python 3.8中，它可以短到:

def split_keep(string, sep):
    start = 0
    while (end := string.find(sep, start) + 1) > 0:
        yield string[start:end]
        start = end
    yield string[start:]