这是最简单的解释。这是我正在使用的:

re.split('\W', 'foo/bar spam\neggs')
>>> ['foo', 'bar', 'spam', 'eggs']

这是我想要的:

someMethod('\W', 'foo/bar spam\neggs')
>>> ['foo', '/', 'bar', ' ', 'spam', '\n', 'eggs']

原因是我想把一个字符串分割成令牌,操作它,然后再把它组合在一起。


当前回答

我在尝试分割文件路径时遇到了类似的问题,并努力找到一个简单的答案。 这对我来说很有效,并且不需要将分隔符替换回分割文本:

My_path = 'folder1/folder2/folder3/file1'

进口再保险

re.findall ('[^/]+/|[^/]+', my_path)

返回:

['folder1/', 'folder2/', 'folder3/', 'file1']

其他回答

如果你只有一个分隔符,你可以使用列表推导式:

text = 'foo,bar,baz,qux'  
sep = ','

附加/将分隔符:

result = [x+sep for x in text.split(sep)]
#['foo,', 'bar,', 'baz,', 'qux,']
# to get rid of trailing
result[-1] = result[-1].strip(sep)
#['foo,', 'bar,', 'baz,', 'qux']

result = [sep+x for x in text.split(sep)]
#[',foo', ',bar', ',baz', ',qux']
# to get rid of trailing
result[0] = result[0].strip(sep)
#['foo', ',bar', ',baz', ',qux']

分隔符作为它自己的元素:

result = [u for x in text.split(sep) for u in (x, sep)]
#['foo', ',', 'bar', ',', 'baz', ',', 'qux', ',']
results = result[:-1]   # to get rid of trailing

这里有一个简单的.split解决方案,不需要regex。

这是一个没有删除分隔符的Python split()的答案,所以不完全是最初的帖子所要求的,但另一个问题被关闭为这个问题的副本。

def splitkeep(s, delimiter):
    split = s.split(delimiter)
    return [substr + delimiter for substr in split[:-1]] + [split[-1]]

随机测试:

import random

CHARS = [".", "a", "b", "c"]
assert splitkeep("", "X") == [""]  # 0 length test
for delimiter in ('.', '..'):
    for _ in range(100000):
        length = random.randint(1, 50)
        s = "".join(random.choice(CHARS) for _ in range(length))
        assert "".join(splitkeep(s, delimiter)) == s

另一个在Python 3上工作良好的非正则表达式解决方案

# Split strings and keep separator
test_strings = ['<Hello>', 'Hi', '<Hi> <Planet>', '<', '']

def split_and_keep(s, sep):
   if not s: return [''] # consistent with string.split()

   # Find replacement character that is not used in string
   # i.e. just use the highest available character plus one
   # Note: This fails if ord(max(s)) = 0x10FFFF (ValueError)
   p=chr(ord(max(s))+1) 

   return s.replace(sep, sep+p).split(p)

for s in test_strings:
   print(split_and_keep(s, '<'))


# If the unicode limit is reached it will fail explicitly
unicode_max_char = chr(1114111)
ridiculous_string = '<Hello>'+unicode_max_char+'<World>'
print(split_and_keep(ridiculous_string, '<'))

一个懒惰而简单的解决方案

假设你的正则表达式模式是split_pattern = r'(!|\?)'

首先,添加一些与新分隔符相同的字符,如'[cut]'

New_string = re.sub(split_pattern, '\\1[cut]', your_string)

然后拆分新的分隔符new_string.split('[cut]')

如果你想拆分字符串,同时通过regex保留分隔符,而不捕获组:

def finditer_with_separators(regex, s):
    matches = []
    prev_end = 0
    for match in regex.finditer(s):
        match_start = match.start()
        if (prev_end != 0 or match_start > 0) and match_start != prev_end:
            matches.append(s[prev_end:match.start()])
        matches.append(match.group())
        prev_end = match.end()
    if prev_end < len(s):
        matches.append(s[prev_end:])
    return matches

regex = re.compile(r"[\(\)]")
matches = finditer_with_separators(regex, s)

如果假设regex被封装到捕获组中:

def split_with_separators(regex, s):
    matches = list(filter(None, regex.split(s)))
    return matches

regex = re.compile(r"([\(\)])")
matches = split_with_separators(regex, s)

这两种方法也将删除空组,在大多数情况下是无用和恼人的。