下面是一个如何做到这一点的例子:

$scope.ctx.skills = data.result.skills;
    $scope.praiseTextArray = [
    "Hooray",
    "You\'re ready to move to a new skill", 
    "Yahoo! You completed a problem", 
    "You\'re doing great",  
    "You succeeded", 
    "That was a brave effort trying new problems", 
    "Your brain was working hard",
    "All your hard work is paying off",
    "Very nice job!, Let\'s see what you can do next",
    "Well done",
    "That was excellent work",
    "Awesome job",
    "You must feel good about doing such a great job",
    "Right on",
    "Great thinking",
    "Wonderful work",
    "You were right on top of that one",
    "Beautiful job",
    "Way to go",
    "Sensational effort"
  ];

  $scope.praiseTextWord = $scope.praiseTextArray[Math.floor(Math.random()*$scope.praiseTextArray.length)];

为了寻找一句真正的俏皮话，我得出了这个结论:

['January', 'February', 'March'].reduce((a, c, i, o) => { return o[Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(o.length))]; })

许多提供的解决方案将一个方法添加到一个特定的数组，这限制了它的使用仅限于该数组。这个解决方案是可重用的代码，适用于任何数组，并且可以是类型安全的。

打印稿

export function randChoice<T>(arr: Array<T>): T {
  return arr[Math.floor(Math.random() * arr.length)]
}

JavaScript

export function randChoice(arr) {
  return arr[Math.floor(Math.random() * arr.length)]
}

最短的版本: var myArray = ['January'， 'February'， 'March']; var rand = myArray[(Math.random() * myArray.length) | 0] console.log (rand)

在我看来，与其把原型搞得乱七八糟，或者及时声明，我更喜欢把它暴露在窗口:

window.choice = function() {
  if (!this.length || this.length == 0) return;
  if (this.length == 1) return this[0];
  return this[Math.floor(Math.random()*this.length)];
}

现在，在你的应用程序的任何地方，你可以这样称呼它:

var rand = window.choice.call(array)

这样你仍然可以正确地使用for(x in array)循环

Randojs使这更简单和可读:

console.log(rando(['January'， 'February'， 'March'])。值); < script src = " https://randojs.com/1.0.0.js " > < /脚本>