如果(像我一样)你不喜欢增强本地实例，也不笨重”。承诺“属性……但是如果你喜欢代理和破坏类，那么这个是给你的:

class GroovyPromise {
  constructor() {
    return new Proxy(new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
      this.resolve = resolve;
      this.reject = reject;
    }), {
      get: (target, prop) =>
        this[prop] || target[prop].bind(target),
    });
  }
}

这样用:

const groovypromise = new GroovyPromise();
setTimeout(() => groovypromise.resolve('groovy'), 1000);
console.log(await groovypromise);

当然，你也可以将类重命名为“Deferred”

我在2015年为我的框架提出了一个解决方案。我把这种类型的承诺称为任务

function createPromise(handler){
  var resolve, reject;

  var promise = new Promise(function(_resolve, _reject){
    resolve = _resolve; 
    reject = _reject;
    if(handler) handler(resolve, reject);
  })
  
  promise.resolve = resolve;
  promise.reject = reject;
  return promise;
}


// create
var promise = createPromise()
promise.then(function(data){ alert(data) })

// resolve from outside
promise.resolve(200)

我喜欢@JonJaques的回答，但我想更进一步。

如果你绑定并捕获Deferred对象，那么它完全实现了Promise API，你可以将它视为Promise并等待它等等。

⚠️ Editor's Note: I don't recommend this kind of pattern anymore since at the time of writing, Promise.prototype.finally was not a thing yet, then it became a thing… This could happen to other methods so I recommend you augment the promise instance with resolve and reject functions instead: function createDeferredPromise() { let resolve let reject const promise = new Promise((thisResolve, thisReject) => { resolve = thisResolve reject = thisReject }) return Object.assign(promise, {resolve, reject}) } Go upvote someone else's answer.

class DeferredPromise { constructor() { this._promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => { // assign the resolve and reject functions to `this` // making them usable on the class instance this.resolve = resolve; this.reject = reject; }); // bind `then` and `catch` to implement the same interface as Promise this.then = this._promise.then.bind(this._promise); this.catch = this._promise.catch.bind(this._promise); this.finally = this._promise.finally.bind(this._promise); this[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Promise'; } } const deferred = new DeferredPromise(); console.log('waiting 2 seconds...'); setTimeout(() => { deferred.resolve('whoa!'); }, 2000); async function someAsyncFunction() { const value = await deferred; console.log(value); } someAsyncFunction();

helper方法可以减轻这种额外的开销，并给您同样的jQuery感觉。

function Deferred() {
    let resolve;
    let reject;
    const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
        resolve = res;
        reject = rej;
    });
    return { promise, resolve, reject };
}

用法是

const { promise, resolve, reject } = Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
    confirm: resolve,
    cancel: reject
});
return promise;

它类似于jQuery

const dfd = $.Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
    confirm: dfd.resolve,
    cancel: dfd.reject
});
return dfd.promise();

不过，在用例中，这种简单的本机语法就可以了

return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    displayConfirmationDialog({
        confirm: resolve,
        cancel: reject
    });
});

感谢每个在这篇文章中发帖的人。我创建了一个模块，其中包括前面描述的Defer()对象以及在其上构建的其他一些对象。它们都利用Promise和简洁的Promise回调语法在程序中实现通信/事件处理。

延迟:可以远程解决失败的承诺(在承诺体之外) 延迟:在给定时间后自动解决的承诺 TimeOut:承诺在给定时间后自动失败。 循环:使用promise语法管理事件的可重新触发承诺 队列:基于承诺链的执行队列。

Rp = require("openpromise")

https://github.com/CABrouwers/openpromise https://www.npmjs.com/package/openpromise

首先在浏览器或节点上启用——allow-native -syntax

const p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
    if (someCondition){
        resolve();
    } else {
        reject();
    } 
});

onClick = function () {
    %ResolvePromise(p, value)
}