如果(像我一样)你不喜欢增强本地实例，也不笨重”。承诺“属性……但是如果你喜欢代理和破坏类，那么这个是给你的:

class GroovyPromise {
  constructor() {
    return new Proxy(new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
      this.resolve = resolve;
      this.reject = reject;
    }), {
      get: (target, prop) =>
        this[prop] || target[prop].bind(target),
    });
  }
}

这样用:

const groovypromise = new GroovyPromise();
setTimeout(() => groovypromise.resolve('groovy'), 1000);
console.log(await groovypromise);

当然，你也可以将类重命名为“Deferred”

不，没有其他方法可以做到这一点——我唯一能说的是这个用例不是很常见。就像Felix在评论中说的那样——你所做的将始终有效。

值得一提的是，promise构造函数以这种方式运行的原因是抛出安全——如果当你的代码在promise构造函数中运行时发生了你没有预料到的异常，它将变成拒绝，这种形式的抛出安全——将抛出的错误转换为拒绝是很重要的，有助于维护可预测的代码。

出于这个抛出安全的原因，承诺构造函数被选择而不是延迟(延迟是一种允许你正在做的事情的替代承诺构造方法)——至于最佳实践——我将传递元素并使用承诺构造函数:

var p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
    this.onclick = resolve;
}.bind(this));

出于这个原因——只要可以使用promise构造函数而不是导出函数——我建议您使用它。无论何时你可以避免两者，避免两者和链。

注意，你永远不应该在if(condition)这样的情况下使用promise构造函数，第一个例子可以这样写:

var p = Promise[(someCondition)?"resolve":"reject"]();

helper方法可以减轻这种额外的开销，并给您同样的jQuery感觉。

function Deferred() {
    let resolve;
    let reject;
    const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
        resolve = res;
        reject = rej;
    });
    return { promise, resolve, reject };
}

用法是

const { promise, resolve, reject } = Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
    confirm: resolve,
    cancel: reject
});
return promise;

它类似于jQuery

const dfd = $.Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
    confirm: dfd.resolve,
    cancel: dfd.reject
});
return dfd.promise();

不过，在用例中，这种简单的本机语法就可以了

return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    displayConfirmationDialog({
        confirm: resolve,
        cancel: reject
    });
});

我发现自己在某些情况下也忽略了Deferred模式。你总是可以在ES6的顶部创建一个:

export default class Deferred<T> {
    private _resolve: (value: T) => void = () => {};
    private _reject: (value: T) => void = () => {};

    private _promise: Promise<T> = new Promise<T>((resolve, reject) => {
        this._reject = reject;
        this._resolve = resolve;
    })

    public get promise(): Promise<T> {
        return this._promise;
    }

    public resolve(value: T) {
        this._resolve(value);
    }

    public reject(value: T) {
        this._reject(value);
    }
}

我喜欢@JonJaques的回答，但我想更进一步。

如果你绑定并捕获Deferred对象，那么它完全实现了Promise API，你可以将它视为Promise并等待它等等。

⚠️ Editor's Note: I don't recommend this kind of pattern anymore since at the time of writing, Promise.prototype.finally was not a thing yet, then it became a thing… This could happen to other methods so I recommend you augment the promise instance with resolve and reject functions instead: function createDeferredPromise() { let resolve let reject const promise = new Promise((thisResolve, thisReject) => { resolve = thisResolve reject = thisReject }) return Object.assign(promise, {resolve, reject}) } Go upvote someone else's answer.

class DeferredPromise { constructor() { this._promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => { // assign the resolve and reject functions to `this` // making them usable on the class instance this.resolve = resolve; this.reject = reject; }); // bind `then` and `catch` to implement the same interface as Promise this.then = this._promise.then.bind(this._promise); this.catch = this._promise.catch.bind(this._promise); this.finally = this._promise.finally.bind(this._promise); this[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Promise'; } } const deferred = new DeferredPromise(); console.log('waiting 2 seconds...'); setTimeout(() => { deferred.resolve('whoa!'); }, 2000); async function someAsyncFunction() { const value = await deferred; console.log(value); } someAsyncFunction();

首先在浏览器或节点上启用——allow-native -syntax

const p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
    if (someCondition){
        resolve();
    } else {
        reject();
    } 
});

onClick = function () {
    %ResolvePromise(p, value)
}