我如何找到一个Bash脚本位于该脚本内部的目录的路径?

我想用Bash脚本作为另一个应用程序的启动器,我想将工作目录更改为Bash脚本所在的目录,所以我可以在该目录中的文件上运行,如下:

$ ./application

当前回答

对于具有 GNU coreutils readlink 的系统(例如,Linux):

$(readlink -f "$(dirname "$0")")

您不需要使用 BASH_SOURCE 当 $0 包含脚本文件名时。

其他回答

总结:

FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

# OR, if you do NOT need it to work for **sourced** scripts too:
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "$0")"

# OR, depending on which path you want, in case of nested `source` calls
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")"

# OR, add `-s` to NOT expand symlinks in the path:
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

SCRIPT_DIRECTORY="$(dirname "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
SCRIPT_FILENAME="$(basename "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"

细节:

在很多情况下,所有你需要获得的是你刚刚打电话的脚本的完整路径. 这可以很容易地通过 realpath 实现. 请注意, realpath 是 GNU 核心工具的一部分. 如果你没有它已经安装(它是默认的在 Ubuntu 上),你可以安装它与 sudo apt 更新 && sudo apt 安装核心工具。

#!/bin/bash

# A. Obtain the full path, and expand (walk down) symbolic links
# A.1. `"$0"` works only if the file is **run**, but NOT if it is **sourced**.
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "$0")"
# A.2. `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` works whether the file is sourced OR run, and even
# if the script is called from within another bash function!
# NB: if `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` doesn't give you quite what you want, use
# `"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"` instead in order to get the first element from the array.
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"
# B.1. `"$0"` works only if the file is **run**, but NOT if it is **sourced**.
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT_KEEP_SYMLINKS="$(realpath -s "$0")"
# B.2. `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` works whether the file is sourced OR run, and even
# if the script is called from within another bash function!
# NB: if `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` doesn't give you quite what you want, use
# `"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"` instead in order to get the first element from the array.
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT_KEEP_SYMLINKS="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

# You can then also get the full path to the directory, and the base
# filename, like this:
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY="$(dirname "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
SCRIPT_FILENAME="$(basename "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"

# Now print it all out
echo "FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT = \"$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT\""
echo "SCRIPT_DIRECTORY    = \"$SCRIPT_DIRECTORY\""
echo "SCRIPT_FILENAME     = \"$SCRIPT_FILENAME\""

如果您在脚本中使用“$0”而不是“${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}”,则在运行脚本时,您将获得相同的输出,而不是在提取脚本时,您将获得此不需要的输出:

~/GS/dev/eRCaGuy_hello_world/bash$ . get_script_path.sh 
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT               = "/bin/bash"
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY                  = "/bin"
SCRIPT_FILENAME                   = "bash"

路径与路径之间的区别:

请注意,直路也成功地走下象征性链接来确定并指向他们的目标,而不是指向象征性链接。 如果你不想要这种行为(有时我不),然后添加到上面的直路命令,使该线看起来像这样:

# Obtain the full path, but do NOT expand (walk down) symbolic links; in
# other words: **keep** the symlinks as part of the path!
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

参考:

[我的答案] Unix 和 Linux:确定路径到源头 Shell 脚本

简短答案:

"`dirname -- "$0";`"

或(最好是):

"$( dirname -- "$0"; )"

这是令人不安的,我发现的唯一一个线路,它在Linux和macOS工作,当执行的脚本是一个同步链接:

SCRIPT_DIR=$(python -c "import os; print(os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath('${BASH_SOURCE[0]}')))")

或,类似,使用Python3 pathlib模块:

SCRIPT_DIR=$(python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; print(Path('${BASH_SOURCE[0]}').resolve().parent)")

在Linux和macOS上进行测试,并与其他解决方案进行比较: https://gist.github.com/ptc-mrucci/61772387878ed53a6c717d51a21d9371

尝试一下这样的东西:

function get_realpath() {

if [[ -f "$1" ]]
then
    # The file *must* exist
    if cd "$(echo "${1%/*}")" &>/dev/null
    then
        # The file *may* not be local.
        # The exception is ./file.ext
        # tTry 'cd .; cd -;' *works!*
        local tmppwd="$PWD"
        cd - &>/dev/null
    else
        # file *must* be local
        local tmppwd="$PWD"
    fi
else
    # The file *cannot* exist
    return 1 # Failure
fi

# Reassemble realpath
echo "$tmppwd"/"${1##*/}"
return 0 # Success

}

function get_dirname(){

local realpath="$(get_realpath "$1")"
if (( $? )) # True when non-zero.
then
    return $? # Failure
fi
echo "${realpath%/*}"
return 0 # Success

}

# Then from the top level:
get_dirname './script.sh'

# Or within a script:
get_dirname "$0"

# Can even test the outcome!
if (( $? )) # True when non-zero.
then
    exit 1 # Failure
fi

這些功能和相關工具是我們的產品的一部分,已為社區提供免費,可以在GitHub找到作為 realpath-lib. 它是簡單的,清潔和良好的文档(很棒的學習),純粹的Bash,並沒有依賴。

source '/path/to/realpath-lib'

get_dirname "$0"

if (( $? )) # True when non-zero.
then
    exit 1 # Failure
fi

我不认为这是像其他人这样容易的。 pwd 不工作,因为当前的目录不一定是与脚本的目录。 $0 不总是有信息。

./script

/usr/bin/script

script

在第一和第三方式 $0 没有完整的路径信息. 在第二和第三, pwd 不工作. 唯一的方式来获得目录的第三方式将是通过路径运行并找到文件与正确的匹配。

做你正在要求的一种方式,就是在 /usr/share 目录中的数据硬编码,并将其引用到其完整的路径。