总结:

FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

# OR, if you do NOT need it to work for **sourced** scripts too:
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "$0")"

# OR, depending on which path you want, in case of nested `source` calls
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")"

# OR, add `-s` to NOT expand symlinks in the path:
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

SCRIPT_DIRECTORY="$(dirname "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
SCRIPT_FILENAME="$(basename "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"

细节:

在很多情况下,所有你需要获得的是你刚刚打电话的脚本的完整路径. 这可以很容易地通过 realpath 实现. 请注意, realpath 是 GNU 核心工具的一部分. 如果你没有它已经安装(它是默认的在 Ubuntu 上),你可以安装它与 sudo apt 更新 && sudo apt 安装核心工具。

#!/bin/bash

# A. Obtain the full path, and expand (walk down) symbolic links
# A.1. `"$0"` works only if the file is **run**, but NOT if it is **sourced**.
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "$0")"
# A.2. `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` works whether the file is sourced OR run, and even
# if the script is called from within another bash function!
# NB: if `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` doesn't give you quite what you want, use
# `"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"` instead in order to get the first element from the array.
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"
# B.1. `"$0"` works only if the file is **run**, but NOT if it is **sourced**.
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT_KEEP_SYMLINKS="$(realpath -s "$0")"
# B.2. `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` works whether the file is sourced OR run, and even
# if the script is called from within another bash function!
# NB: if `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` doesn't give you quite what you want, use
# `"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"` instead in order to get the first element from the array.
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT_KEEP_SYMLINKS="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

# You can then also get the full path to the directory, and the base
# filename, like this:
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY="$(dirname "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
SCRIPT_FILENAME="$(basename "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"

# Now print it all out
echo "FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT = \"$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT\""
echo "SCRIPT_DIRECTORY    = \"$SCRIPT_DIRECTORY\""
echo "SCRIPT_FILENAME     = \"$SCRIPT_FILENAME\""

如果您在脚本中使用“$0”而不是“${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}”,则在运行脚本时,您将获得相同的输出,而不是在提取脚本时,您将获得此不需要的输出:

~/GS/dev/eRCaGuy_hello_world/bash$ . get_script_path.sh 
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT               = "/bin/bash"
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY                  = "/bin"
SCRIPT_FILENAME                   = "bash"

路径与路径之间的区别:

请注意,直路也成功地走下象征性链接来确定并指向他们的目标,而不是指向象征性链接。 如果你不想要这种行为(有时我不),然后添加到上面的直路命令,使该线看起来像这样:

# Obtain the full path, but do NOT expand (walk down) symbolic links; in
# other words: **keep** the symlinks as part of the path!
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"

参考:

[我的答案] Unix 和 Linux:确定路径到源头 Shell 脚本

命名命令是最基本的,简单地将路径到0美元(脚本名称)变量的名称:

dirname -- "$0";

但是,正如Matt b指出的那样,返回的路径取决于脚本的名称。 pwd 不做工作,因为它只告诉你当前的目录是什么,而不是脚本的目录是什么。

有些人提到了阅读链接命令,但最简单的是,你可以使用:

dirname -- "$( readlink -f -- "$0"; )";

阅读链接将解决脚本路径从文件系统的根源到绝对路径,因此,任何包含单点或双点的路径,图标和/或象征性链接将解决到完整路径。

#!/usr/bin/env bash

echo "pwd: `pwd`"
echo "\$0: $0"
echo "basename: `basename -- "$0"`"
echo "dirname: `dirname -- "$0"`"
echo "dirname/readlink: $( dirname -- "$( readlink -f -- "$0"; )"; )"

在我的家中运行这个脚本,使用相对的路径:

>>>$ ./whatdir.sh
pwd: /Users/phatblat
$0: ./whatdir.sh
basename: whatdir.sh
dirname: .
dirname/readlink: /Users/phatblat

再一次,但使用完整的路径到脚本:

>>>$ /Users/phatblat/whatdir.sh
pwd: /Users/phatblat
$0: /Users/phatblat/whatdir.sh
basename: whatdir.sh
dirname: /Users/phatblat
dirname/readlink: /Users/phatblat

现在更改目录:

>>>$ cd /tmp
>>>$ ~/whatdir.sh
pwd: /tmp
$0: /Users/phatblat/whatdir.sh
basename: whatdir.sh
dirname: /Users/phatblat
dirname/readlink: /Users/phatblat

最后,使用一个象征性的链接来执行脚本:

>>>$ ln -s ~/whatdir.sh whatdirlink.sh
>>>$ ./whatdirlink.sh
pwd: /tmp
$0: ./whatdirlink.sh
basename: whatdirlink.sh
dirname: .
dirname/readlink: /Users/phatblat

然而,有一個案例,這不起作用,當脚本來源(而不是執行)在 bash:

>>>$ cd /tmp
>>>$ . ~/whatdir.sh  
pwd: /tmp
$0: bash
basename: bash
dirname: .
dirname/readlink: /tmp

这种方法的一个好处是,它不涉及Bash本身以外的任何东西,也不会破坏任何底层。

首先,使用模式替代替代不以 / (即相对路径) 以 $ PWD/. 因为我们使用替代替代相匹配的第一个字符为 $ 0,我们也必须添加它回来(${0:0:1} 在替代中)。

现在我们有一个完整的路径到脚本;我们可以通过删除最后的 / 和随后的任何东西(即脚本名称)来获得目录。

#!/bin/bash

BIN=${0/#[!\/]/"$PWD/${0:0:1}"}
DIR=${BIN%/*}

cd "$DIR"

如果您的脚本可以源于而不是执行,您可以将 $0 取代 ${BASH_SOURCE[0]},例如:

BIN=${BASH_SOURCE[0]/#[!\/]/"$PWD/${BASH_SOURCE[0]:0:1}"}

这将为可执行的脚本工作,它更长,但更多。

以下是一個符合 POSIX 的單線:

SCRIPT_PATH=`dirname "$0"`; SCRIPT_PATH=`eval "cd \"$SCRIPT_PATH\" && pwd"`

# test
echo $SCRIPT_PATH

我会用这样的东西:

# Retrieve the full pathname of the called script
scriptPath=$(which $0)

# Check whether the path is a link or not
if [ -L $scriptPath ]; then

    # It is a link then retrieve the target path and get the directory name
    sourceDir=$(dirname $(readlink -f $scriptPath))

else

    # Otherwise just get the directory name of the script path
    sourceDir=$(dirname $scriptPath)

fi

选择的答案非常好,我把我的解决方案发送给任何人寻找更短的替代方案,这些解决方案仍然涉及来源、执行、完整路径、相对路径和同步链接,最后,这将在 macOS 上工作,因为不能假设GNU的核心路径的阅读链接版本可用。

GOTCHA是它不使用Bash,但它很容易在Bash脚本中使用,虽然OP没有在解决方案的语言上设置任何限制,但它可能是最好的,大多数人已经留在Bash世界中。

PHP 可在 macOS 默认情况下,并安装在其他平台上,但不一定是默认情况下. 我意识到这是一个缺点,但我会留下这个在这里,任何人来自搜索引擎,无论如何。

export SOURCE_DIRECTORY="$(php -r 'echo dirname(realpath($argv[1]));' -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")"