互斥量是任何想要解决临界区问题的算法都必须遵循的标准，而二进制信号量本身是一个可以取0和1值的变量。

神话:

一些文章说“二进制信号量和互斥量是相同的”或“值为1的信号量是互斥量”，但基本的区别是互斥量只能由获得它的线程释放，而你可以从任何其他线程发出信号量

重点:

一个线程可以获得多个锁(互斥锁)。

只有递归互斥锁才能被锁多次，这里的锁和锁应该是一样的

•如果一个线程已经锁定了一个互斥锁，试图再次锁定互斥锁，它将进入该互斥锁的等待列表，这将导致死锁。

二进制信号量和互斥量相似但不相同。

互斥是昂贵的操作，因为与它相关的保护协议。

互斥的主要目的是实现对资源的原子访问或锁定

互斥锁控制对单个共享资源的访问。它提供了获取()对资源的访问并在完成后释放()资源的操作。

信号量控制对共享资源池的访问。它提供Wait()操作，直到池中的一个资源可用，并提供Signal()操作，当它返回池时。

当一个信号量保护的资源数量大于1时，它被称为计数信号量。当它控制一个资源时，它被称为布尔信号量。布尔信号量相当于互斥量。

因此，信号量是比互斥量更高级别的抽象。互斥锁可以用信号量来实现，但不能用信号量来实现。

The basic issue is concurrency. There is more than one flow of control. Think about two processes using a shared memory. Now only one process can access the shared memory at a time. If more than one process accesses the shared memory at a time, the contents of shared memory would get corrupted. It is like a railroad track. Only one train can run on it, else there would be an accident.So there is a signalling mechanism, which a driver checks. If the signal is green, the train can go and if it is red it has to wait to use the track. Similarly in case of shared memory, there is a binary semaphore. If the semaphore is 1, a process acquires it (makes it 0) and goes ahead and accesses it. If the semaphore is 0, the process waits. The functionality the binary semaphore has to provide is mutual exclusion (or mutex, in short) so that only one of the many concurrent entities (process or thread) mutually excludes others. It is a plus that we have counting semaphores, which help in synchronizing multiple instances of a resource.

互斥是信号量提供的基本功能。现在在线程上下文中，我们可能有不同的名称和语法。但基本概念是相同的:如何在并发编程中保持代码和数据的完整性。在我看来，像所有权和相关检查这样的东西是由实现提供的改进。

You obviously use mutex to lock a data in one thread getting accessed by another thread at the same time. Assume that you have just called lock() and in the process of accessing data. This means that you don’t expect any other thread (or another instance of the same thread-code) to access the same data locked by the same mutex. That is, if it is the same thread-code getting executed on a different thread instance, hits the lock, then the lock() should block the control flow there. This applies to a thread that uses a different thread-code, which is also accessing the same data and which is also locked by the same mutex. In this case, you are still in the process of accessing the data and you may take, say, another 15 secs to reach the mutex unlock (so that the other thread that is getting blocked in mutex lock would unblock and would allow the control to access the data). Do you at any cost allow yet another thread to just unlock the same mutex, and in turn, allow the thread that is already waiting (blocking) in the mutex lock to unblock and access the data? Hope you got what I am saying here? As per, agreed upon universal definition!,

使用“互斥”就不会发生这种情况。没有其他线程可以解锁锁 在你的帖子里 使用“二进制信号量”可以实现这种情况。任何其他线程都可以解锁 线程中的锁

因此，如果您非常注重使用二进制信号量而不是互斥量，那么在锁定和解锁的“作用域”时应该非常小心。我的意思是，每个触及每个锁的控制流都应该触及一个解锁调用，也不应该有任何“第一次解锁”，而应该总是“第一次锁定”。

互斥量和二进制信号量是相同的用法，但实际上，它们是不同的。

对于互斥锁，只有锁定了它的线程才能解锁它。如果有其他线程来锁定它，它将等待。

对于信号电话来说，情况就不是这样了。信号量没有与特定的线程ID绑定。