我有一些测试数据，想为每个项目创建一个单元测试。我的第一个想法是这样做的:
import unittest
l = [["foo", "a", "a",], ["bar", "a", "b"], ["lee", "b", "b"]]
class TestSequence(unittest.TestCase):
def testsample(self):
for name, a,b in l:
print "test", name
self.assertEqual(a,b)
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
这样做的缺点是它在一个测试中处理所有数据。我想在飞行中为每个项目生成一个测试。有什么建议吗?
当前回答
使用unittest(从3.4开始)
从Python 3.4开始，标准库unittest包具有subTest上下文管理器。
参见文档:
26.4.7. 使用子测试区分测试迭代 分测验
例子:
from unittest import TestCase
param_list = [('a', 'a'), ('a', 'b'), ('b', 'b')]
class TestDemonstrateSubtest(TestCase):
def test_works_as_expected(self):
for p1, p2 in param_list:
with self.subTest():
self.assertEqual(p1, p2)
你也可以给subTest()指定一个自定义消息和参数值:
with self.subTest(msg="Checking if p1 equals p2", p1=p1, p2=p2):
用鼻子
鼻测试框架支持这一点。
示例(下面的代码是包含测试的文件的全部内容):
param_list = [('a', 'a'), ('a', 'b'), ('b', 'b')]
def test_generator():
for params in param_list:
yield check_em, params[0], params[1]
def check_em(a, b):
assert a == b
nosetests命令输出信息如下:
> nosetests -v
testgen.test_generator('a', 'a') ... ok
testgen.test_generator('a', 'b') ... FAIL
testgen.test_generator('b', 'b') ... ok
======================================================================
FAIL: testgen.test_generator('a', 'b')
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/nose-0.10.1-py2.5.egg/nose/case.py", line 203, in runTest
self.test(*self.arg)
File "testgen.py", line 7, in check_em
assert a == b
AssertionError
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 3 tests in 0.006s
FAILED (failures=1)
其他回答
使用ddt库。它为测试方法添加了简单的装饰器:
import unittest
from ddt import ddt, data
from mycode import larger_than_two
@ddt
class FooTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
@data(3, 4, 12, 23)
def test_larger_than_two(self, value):
self.assertTrue(larger_than_two(value))
@data(1, -3, 2, 0)
def test_not_larger_than_two(self, value):
self.assertFalse(larger_than_two(value))
这个库可以用pip安装。它不需要nose，并且与标准库unittest模块一起出色地工作。
这实际上与之前的回答中提到的parameterized相同，但具体到unittest:
def sub_test(param_list):
"""Decorates a test case to run it as a set of subtests."""
def decorator(f):
@functools.wraps(f)
def wrapped(self):
for param in param_list:
with self.subTest(**param):
f(self, **param)
return wrapped
return decorator
使用示例:
class TestStuff(unittest.TestCase):
@sub_test([
dict(arg1='a', arg2='b'),
dict(arg1='x', arg2='y'),
])
def test_stuff(self, arg1, arg2):
...
您将从尝试testscenario库中受益。
testscenes为python unittest风格的测试提供了干净的依赖注入。这可以用于接口测试(通过单个测试套件测试许多实现)或经典的依赖项注入(在测试代码本身的外部提供依赖项测试，允许在不同情况下轻松测试)。
import unittest
def generator(test_class, a, b,c,d,name):
def test(self):
print('Testexecution=',name)
print('a=',a)
print('b=',b)
print('c=',c)
print('d=',d)
return test
def add_test_methods(test_class):
test_list = [[3,3,5,6, 'one'], [5,5,8,9, 'two'], [0,0,5,6, 'three'],[0,0,2,3,'Four']]
for case in test_list:
print('case=',case[0], case[1],case[2],case[3],case[4])
test = generator(test_class, case[0], case[1],case[2],case[3],case[4])
setattr(test_class, "test_%s" % case[4], test)
class TestAuto(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
print ('Setup')
pass
def tearDown(self):
print ('TearDown')
pass
add_test_methods(TestAuto)
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main(verbosity=1)
只使用元类，如这里所示;
class DocTestMeta(type):
"""
Test functions are generated in metaclass due to the way some
test loaders work. For example, setupClass() won't get called
unless there are other existing test methods, and will also
prevent unit test loader logic being called before the test
methods have been defined.
"""
def __init__(self, name, bases, attrs):
super(DocTestMeta, self).__init__(name, bases, attrs)
def __new__(cls, name, bases, attrs):
def func(self):
"""Inner test method goes here"""
self.assertTrue(1)
func.__name__ = 'test_sample'
attrs[func.__name__] = func
return super(DocTestMeta, cls).__new__(cls, name, bases, attrs)
class ExampleTestCase(TestCase):
"""Our example test case, with no methods defined"""
__metaclass__ = DocTestMeta
输出:
test_sample (ExampleTestCase) ... OK
