它和cron之间的主要区别是异常会永久地杀死守护进程。您可能希望使用异常捕获器和记录器进行包装。

import time, traceback

def every(delay, task):
  next_time = time.time() + delay
  while True:
    time.sleep(max(0, next_time - time.time()))
    try:
      task()
    except Exception:
      traceback.print_exc()
      # in production code you might want to have this instead of course:
      # logger.exception("Problem while executing repetitive task.")
    # skip tasks if we are behind schedule:
    next_time += (time.time() - next_time) // delay * delay + delay

def foo():
  print("foo", time.time())

every(5, foo)

如果你想在不阻塞剩余代码的情况下这样做，你可以使用这个让它在自己的线程中运行:

import threading
threading.Thread(target=lambda: every(5, foo)).start()

该解决方案结合了其他解决方案中很少结合的几个特性:

Exception handling: As far as possible on this level, exceptions are handled properly, i. e. get logged for debugging purposes without aborting our program. No chaining: The common chain-like implementation (for scheduling the next event) you find in many answers is brittle in the aspect that if anything goes wrong within the scheduling mechanism (threading.Timer or whatever), this will terminate the chain. No further executions will happen then, even if the reason of the problem is already fixed. A simple loop and waiting with a simple sleep() is much more robust in comparison. No drift: My solution keeps an exact track of the times it is supposed to run at. There is no drift depending on the execution time (as in many other solutions). Skipping: My solution will skip tasks if one execution took too much time (e. g. do X every five seconds, but X took 6 seconds). This is the standard cron behavior (and for a good reason). Many other solutions then simply execute the task several times in a row without any delay. For most cases (e. g. cleanup tasks) this is not wished. If it is wished, simply use next_time += delay instead.

下面是MestreLion对代码的更新，它可以避免随着时间的推移而漂移。

这里的RepeatedTimer类按照OP的请求每隔“间隔”秒调用给定函数;调度并不取决于函数执行的时间。我喜欢这个解决方案，因为它没有外部库依赖关系;这是纯python。

import threading 
import time

class RepeatedTimer(object):
  def __init__(self, interval, function, *args, **kwargs):
    self._timer = None
    self.interval = interval
    self.function = function
    self.args = args
    self.kwargs = kwargs
    self.is_running = False
    self.next_call = time.time()
    self.start()

  def _run(self):
    self.is_running = False
    self.start()
    self.function(*self.args, **self.kwargs)

  def start(self):
    if not self.is_running:
      self.next_call += self.interval
      self._timer = threading.Timer(self.next_call - time.time(), self._run)
      self._timer.start()
      self.is_running = True

  def stop(self):
    self._timer.cancel()
    self.is_running = False

示例用法(摘自MestreLion的回答):

from time import sleep

def hello(name):
    print "Hello %s!" % name

print "starting..."
rt = RepeatedTimer(1, hello, "World") # it auto-starts, no need of rt.start()
try:
    sleep(5) # your long-running job goes here...
finally:
    rt.stop() # better in a try/finally block to make sure the program ends!

以下是MestreLion代码的改编版本。 除了原来的函数，这段代码:

1)添加用于在特定时间触发计时器的first_interval(调用者需要计算first_interval并传递进来)

2)在原代码中解决一个竞态条件。在原始代码中，如果控制线程未能取消正在运行的计时器(“停止计时器，并取消计时器动作的执行。这只会在计时器仍处于等待阶段时起作用。”引用自https://docs.python.org/2/library/threading.html)，计时器将无休止地运行。

class RepeatedTimer(object):
def __init__(self, first_interval, interval, func, *args, **kwargs):
    self.timer      = None
    self.first_interval = first_interval
    self.interval   = interval
    self.func   = func
    self.args       = args
    self.kwargs     = kwargs
    self.running = False
    self.is_started = False

def first_start(self):
    try:
        # no race-condition here because only control thread will call this method
        # if already started will not start again
        if not self.is_started:
            self.is_started = True
            self.timer = Timer(self.first_interval, self.run)
            self.running = True
            self.timer.start()
    except Exception as e:
        log_print(syslog.LOG_ERR, "timer first_start failed %s %s"%(e.message, traceback.format_exc()))
        raise

def run(self):
    # if not stopped start again
    if self.running:
        self.timer = Timer(self.interval, self.run)
        self.timer.start()
    self.func(*self.args, **self.kwargs)

def stop(self):
    # cancel current timer in case failed it's still OK
    # if already stopped doesn't matter to stop again
    if self.timer:
        self.timer.cancel()
    self.running = False

如果你想要一种非阻塞的方式来周期性地执行你的函数，而不是阻塞无限循环，我会使用线程计时器。这样，您的代码可以继续运行并执行其他任务，并且仍然每n秒调用一次您的函数。我经常使用这种技术打印长时间、CPU/磁盘/网络密集型任务的进度信息。

下面是我在类似问题中发布的代码，带有start()和stop()控件:

from threading import Timer

class RepeatedTimer(object):
    def __init__(self, interval, function, *args, **kwargs):
        self._timer     = None
        self.interval   = interval
        self.function   = function
        self.args       = args
        self.kwargs     = kwargs
        self.is_running = False
        self.start()

    def _run(self):
        self.is_running = False
        self.start()
        self.function(*self.args, **self.kwargs)

    def start(self):
        if not self.is_running:
            self._timer = Timer(self.interval, self._run)
            self._timer.start()
            self.is_running = True

    def stop(self):
        self._timer.cancel()
        self.is_running = False

用法:

from time import sleep

def hello(name):
    print "Hello %s!" % name

print "starting..."
rt = RepeatedTimer(1, hello, "World") # it auto-starts, no need of rt.start()
try:
    sleep(5) # your long-running job goes here...
finally:
    rt.stop() # better in a try/finally block to make sure the program ends!

特点:

只有标准库，没有外部依赖 即使计时器已经启动/停止，也可以安全地多次调用Start()和stop() 要调用的函数可以有位置参数和命名参数 您可以随时更改间隔，它将在下次运行后生效。args、kwargs甚至function也一样!

我认为更简单的方法是:

import time

def executeSomething():
    #code here
    time.sleep(60)

while True:
    executeSomething()

这样，你的代码被执行，然后等待60秒，然后再次执行，等待，执行，等等…… 没有必要把事情复杂化:D