来自c#背景,变量和方法名的命名约定通常是camelCase或PascalCase:
// C# example
string thisIsMyVariable = "a"
public void ThisIsMyMethod()
在Python中,我见过上面的情况,但我也见过使用下划线:
# python example
this_is_my_variable = 'a'
def this_is_my_function():
Python是否有更可取、更明确的编码风格?
来自c#背景,变量和方法名的命名约定通常是camelCase或PascalCase:
// C# example
string thisIsMyVariable = "a"
public void ThisIsMyMethod()
在Python中,我见过上面的情况,但我也见过使用下划线:
# python example
this_is_my_variable = 'a'
def this_is_my_function():
Python是否有更可取、更明确的编码风格?
当前回答
通常,要遵循语言标准库中使用的约定。
其他回答
There is PEP 8, as other answers show, but PEP 8 is only the styleguide for the standard library, and it's only taken as gospel therein. One of the most frequent deviations of PEP 8 for other pieces of code is the variable naming, specifically for methods. There is no single predominate style, although considering the volume of code that uses mixedCase, if one were to make a strict census one would probably end up with a version of PEP 8 with mixedCase. There is little other deviation from PEP 8 that is quite as common.
就我个人而言,我尝试在类、mixedCase方法和函数中使用CamelCase。变量通常用下划线分隔(当我记得的时候)。这样我一眼就能知道我到底在调用什么,而不是所有东西看起来都一样。
有一篇关于这方面的论文:http://www.cs.kent.edu/~jmaletic/papers/ICPC2010-CamelCaseUnderScoreClouds.pdf
它说snake_case比camelCase可读性更好。这就是为什么现代语言在任何可能的地方都使用(或应该使用)蛇。
我个人在用其他编程语言开发时使用Java的命名约定,因为它是一致的,易于遵循。这样我就不会一直纠结于使用什么约定,而这本来不应该是我项目中最难的部分!
David Goodger(在这里的“像Pythonista一样编码”中)描述了PEP 8的建议如下:
Joined_lower函数,方法, 属性、变量 joined_lower或ALL_CAPS for 常量 课程用的studlycap 骆驼案只符合 已有的约定