正如Python代码风格指南所承认的那样，

Python的命名约定 图书馆有点乱，所以我们 永远不能完全一致

注意，这只是指Python的标准库。如果他们不能保持一致，那么几乎没有希望为所有Python代码拥有一个普遍遵守的约定，不是吗?

从这一点，以及这里的讨论，我可以推断，如果一个人在过渡到Python时继续使用例如Java或c#的(清晰而完善的)变量和函数命名约定，这并不是一个可怕的罪恶。当然，要记住，最好是遵循代码库/项目/团队的流行风格。正如Python风格指南所指出的，内部一致性是最重要的。

尽管把我当异教徒看待吧。:-)和OP一样，我不是一个“Pythonista”，至少现在还不是。

There is PEP 8, as other answers show, but PEP 8 is only the styleguide for the standard library, and it's only taken as gospel therein. One of the most frequent deviations of PEP 8 for other pieces of code is the variable naming, specifically for methods. There is no single predominate style, although considering the volume of code that uses mixedCase, if one were to make a strict census one would probably end up with a version of PEP 8 with mixedCase. There is little other deviation from PEP 8 that is quite as common.

列宁告诉过……我也是来自Java/ c#世界的。还有SQL。 仔细审视我自己，试图找到第一眼就能理解的复杂结构的例子，比如列表字典中的列表，其中所有东西都是对象。 对我来说，骆驼语或它们的变体应该成为任何语言的标准。在复杂句中应保留下划线。

大多数使用python的人更喜欢下划线，但即使我已经使用python 5年多了，我仍然不喜欢它们。我只是觉得它们很丑，但也许这就是我脑子里的爪哇。

I simply like CamelCase better since it fits better with the way classes are named, It feels more logical to have SomeClass.doSomething() than SomeClass.do_something(). If you look around in the global module index in python, you will find both, which is due to the fact that it's a collection of libraries from various sources that grew overtime and not something that was developed by one company like Sun with strict coding rules. I would say the bottom line is: Use whatever you like better, it's just a question of personal taste.

就我个人而言，我尝试在类、mixedCase方法和函数中使用CamelCase。变量通常用下划线分隔(当我记得的时候)。这样我一眼就能知道我到底在调用什么，而不是所有东西看起来都一样。

编码风格通常是组织内部策略/约定标准的一部分，但我认为一般来说，all_lower_case_underscore_separator风格(也称为snake_case)在python中最常见。