考虑使用https://github.com/WahidBitar/EF-Core-Simple-Graph-Update。 这对我来说很有效。

这个库很简单，实际上只有一个扩展方法

T InsertUpdateOrDeleteGraph<T>(this DbContext context,
 T newEntity, T existingEntity)

https://github.com/WahidBitar/EF-Core-Simple-Graph-Update/blob/master/src/Diwink.Extensions.EntityFrameworkCore/DbContextExtensions.cs#L34

与这个问题的大多数答案相比，它是通用的(不使用硬编码的表名，可以用于不同的模型)， 并包括针对不同模型更改的单元测试。 作者及时回应报告的问题。

因为发布到WebApi控制器的模型是从任何实体框架(EF)上下文中分离出来的，所以唯一的选择是从数据库中加载对象图(父对象图包括其子对象图)，并比较哪些子对象图被添加、删除或更新。(除非你在分离状态下(在浏览器中或其他地方)使用自己的跟踪机制跟踪更改，在我看来这比下面的更复杂。)它可能是这样的:

public void Update(UpdateParentModel model)
{
    var existingParent = _dbContext.Parents
        .Where(p => p.Id == model.Id)
        .Include(p => p.Children)
        .SingleOrDefault();

    if (existingParent != null)
    {
        // Update parent
        _dbContext.Entry(existingParent).CurrentValues.SetValues(model);

        // Delete children
        foreach (var existingChild in existingParent.Children.ToList())
        {
            if (!model.Children.Any(c => c.Id == existingChild.Id))
                _dbContext.Children.Remove(existingChild);
        }

        // Update and Insert children
        foreach (var childModel in model.Children)
        {
            var existingChild = existingParent.Children
                .Where(c => c.Id == childModel.Id && c.Id != default(int))
                .SingleOrDefault();

            if (existingChild != null)
                // Update child
                _dbContext.Entry(existingChild).CurrentValues.SetValues(childModel);
            else
            {
                // Insert child
                var newChild = new Child
                {
                    Data = childModel.Data,
                    //...
                };
                existingParent.Children.Add(newChild);
            }
        }

        _dbContext.SaveChanges();
    }
}

……CurrentValues。SetValues可以接受任何对象，并根据属性名将属性值映射到附加的实体。如果模型中的属性名称与实体中的名称不同，则不能使用此方法，必须逐个分配值。

So, I finally managed to get it working, although not fully automatically. Notice the AutoMapper <3. It handles all the mapping of properties so you don't have to do it manually. Also, if used in a way where it maps from one object to another, then it only updates the properties and that marks changed properties as Modified to EF, which is what we want. If you would use explicit context.Update(entity), the difference would be that entire object would be marked as Modified and EVERY prop would be updated. In that case you don't need tracking but the drawbacks are as mentioned. Maybe that's not a problem for you but it's more expensive and I want to log exact changes inside Save so I need correct info.

            // We always want tracking for auto-updates
            var entityToUpdate = unitOfWork.GetGenericRepository<Article, int>()
                .GetAllActive() // Uses EF tracking
                .Include(e => e.Barcodes.Where(e => e.Status == DatabaseEntityStatus.Active))
                .First(e => e.Id == request.Id);

            mapper.Map(request, entityToUpdate); // Maps it to entity with AutoMapper <3
            ModifyBarcodes(entityToUpdate, request);

            // Removed part of the code for space

            unitOfWork.Save();

ModifyBarcodes部分在这里。 我们希望以一种EF跟踪不会被打乱的方式修改集合。 不幸的是，AutoMapper映射会创建一个全新的集合实例，因此会搞砸跟踪，尽管，我很确定它应该工作。 无论如何，因为我从FE发送完整的列表，在这里我们实际上决定了应该添加/更新/删除什么，只是处理列表本身。 由于EF跟踪是打开的，EF处理它就像一个魅力。

            var toUpdate = article.Barcodes
                .Where(e => articleDto.Barcodes.Select(b => b.Id).Contains(e.Id))
                .ToList();

            toUpdate.ForEach(e =>
            {
                var newValue = articleDto.Barcodes.FirstOrDefault(f => f.Id == e.Id);
                mapper.Map(newValue, e);
            });

            var toAdd = articleDto.Barcodes
                .Where(e => !article.Barcodes.Select(b => b.Id).Contains(e.Id))
                .Select(e => mapper.Map<Barcode>(e))
                .ToList();

            article.Barcodes.AddRange(toAdd);

            article.Barcodes
                .Where(e => !articleDto.Barcodes.Select(b => b.Id).Contains(e.Id))
                .ToList()
                .ForEach(e => article.Barcodes.Remove(e));


CreateMap<ArticleDto, Article>()
            .ForMember(e => e.DateCreated, opt => opt.Ignore())
            .ForMember(e => e.DateModified, opt => opt.Ignore())
            .ForMember(e => e.CreatedById, opt => opt.Ignore())
            .ForMember(e => e.LastModifiedById, opt => opt.Ignore())
            .ForMember(e => e.Status, opt => opt.Ignore())
            // When mapping collections, the reference itself is destroyed
            // hence f* up EF tracking and makes it think all previous is deleted
            // Better to leave it on manual and handle collecion manually
            .ForMember(e => e.Barcodes, opt => opt.Ignore())
            .ReverseMap()
            .ForMember(e => e.Barcodes, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Barcodes.Where(e => e.Status == DatabaseEntityStatus.Active)));

VB。NET开发人员使用这个通用子标记子状态，易于使用

注: PromatCon:实体对象 amList:要添加或修改的子列表 rList:要删除的子列表

updatechild(objCas.ECC_Decision, PromatCon.ECC_Decision.Where(Function(c) c.rid = objCas.rid And Not objCas.ECC_Decision.Select(Function(x) x.dcid).Contains(c.dcid)).toList)

Sub updatechild(Of Ety)(amList As ICollection(Of Ety), rList As ICollection(Of Ety))
        If amList IsNot Nothing Then
            For Each obj In amList
                Dim x = PromatCon.Entry(obj).GetDatabaseValues()
                If x Is Nothing Then
                    PromatCon.Entry(obj).State = EntityState.Added
                Else
                    PromatCon.Entry(obj).State = EntityState.Modified
                End If
            Next
        End If

        If rList IsNot Nothing Then
            For Each obj In rList.ToList
                PromatCon.Entry(obj).State = EntityState.Deleted
            Next
        End If
End Sub

PromatCon.SaveChanges()

好男人。我曾经有过这个答案，但后来又失去了。当你知道有更好的方法，但却想不起来或找不到时，绝对是一种折磨!这很简单。我只是用多种方法测试了一下。

var parent = _dbContext.Parents
  .Where(p => p.Id == model.Id)
  .Include(p => p.Children)
  .FirstOrDefault();

parent.Children = _dbContext.Children.Where(c => <Query for New List Here>);
_dbContext.Entry(parent).State = EntityState.Modified;

_dbContext.SaveChanges();

你可以用一个新的列表替换整个列表!SQL代码将根据需要删除和添加实体。你不必为那件事操心。确保包含子集合，否则就没有骰子。好运！

这是我的代码，工作得很好。

public async Task<bool> UpdateDeviceShutdownAsync(Guid id, DateTime shutdownAtTime, int areaID, decimal mileage,
        decimal motohours, int driverID, List<int> commission,
        string shutdownPlaceDescr, int deviceShutdownTypeID, string deviceShutdownDesc,
        bool isTransportation, string violationConditions, DateTime shutdownStartTime,
        DateTime shutdownEndTime, string notes, List<Guid> faultIDs )
        {
            try
            {
                using (var db = new GJobEntities())
                {
                    var isExisting = await db.DeviceShutdowns.FirstOrDefaultAsync(x => x.ID == id);

                    if (isExisting != null)
                    {
                        isExisting.AreaID = areaID;
                        isExisting.DriverID = driverID;
                        isExisting.IsTransportation = isTransportation;
                        isExisting.Mileage = mileage;
                        isExisting.Motohours = motohours;
                        isExisting.Notes = notes;                    
                        isExisting.DeviceShutdownDesc = deviceShutdownDesc;
                        isExisting.DeviceShutdownTypeID = deviceShutdownTypeID;
                        isExisting.ShutdownAtTime = shutdownAtTime;
                        isExisting.ShutdownEndTime = shutdownEndTime;
                        isExisting.ShutdownStartTime = shutdownStartTime;
                        isExisting.ShutdownPlaceDescr = shutdownPlaceDescr;
                        isExisting.ViolationConditions = violationConditions;

                        // Delete children
                        foreach (var existingChild in isExisting.DeviceShutdownFaults.ToList())
                        {
                            db.DeviceShutdownFaults.Remove(existingChild);
                        }

                        if (faultIDs != null && faultIDs.Any())
                        {
                            foreach (var faultItem in faultIDs)
                            {
                                var newChild = new DeviceShutdownFault
                                {
                                    ID = Guid.NewGuid(),
                                    DDFaultID = faultItem,
                                    DeviceShutdownID = isExisting.ID,
                                };

                                isExisting.DeviceShutdownFaults.Add(newChild);
                            }
                        }

                        // Delete all children
                        foreach (var existingChild in isExisting.DeviceShutdownComissions.ToList())
                        {
                            db.DeviceShutdownComissions.Remove(existingChild);
                        }

                        // Add all new children
                        if (commission != null && commission.Any())
                        {
                            foreach (var cItem in commission)
                            {
                                var newChild = new DeviceShutdownComission
                                {
                                    ID = Guid.NewGuid(),
                                    PersonalID = cItem,
                                    DeviceShutdownID = isExisting.ID,
                                };

                                isExisting.DeviceShutdownComissions.Add(newChild);
                            }
                        }

                        await db.SaveChangesAsync();

                        return true;
                    }
                }
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                logger.Error(ex);
            }

            return false;
        }