恕我直言，原因是他们太懒了，没有去实施/纠正这个错误。 暗示C/ c++程序员不理解unsigned，结构，联合，位标志…太荒谬了。

如果你正在和一个基本的/bash/java程序员交谈，即将开始用C语言编程，没有任何真正的语言知识，或者你只是在说你自己的想法。；）

当你每天处理文件或硬件的格式时，你会开始质疑，他们到底在想什么。

一个很好的例子是尝试使用无符号字节作为自旋转循环。 对于那些不理解最后一句话的人，你究竟是如何称自己为程序员的。

DC

我知道这个帖子太老了;但是，在Java 8及以后版本中，您可以使用int数据类型来表示无符号32位整数，其最小值为0，最大值为232−1。使用Integer类使用int数据类型作为无符号整数，并且像compareUnsigned()， divideUnsigned()等静态方法已经添加到Integer类中，以支持无符号整数的算术操作。

Java确实有unsigned类型，或者至少有一个:char是一个unsigned short类型。所以不管高斯林找什么借口，他都不知道为什么没有其他无符号类型。

还有短型:短型一直被用于多媒体。原因是您可以在一个32位无符号长函数中拟合2个样本，并向量化许多操作。8位数据和无符号字节也是如此。你可以在一个寄存器中放入4或8个样本进行向量化。

我听说它们将在接近最初的Java发行版时被包含。Oak是Java的前身，在一些规范文档中提到了使用值。不幸的是，这些都没有被引入Java语言。据任何人所知，可能由于时间限制，它们没有得到实施。

I once took a C++ course with someone on the C++ standards committee who implied that Java made the right decision to avoid having unsigned integers because (1) most programs that use unsigned integers can do just as well with signed integers and this is more natural in terms of how people think, and (2) using unsigned integers results in lots easy to create but difficult to debug issues such as integer arithmetic overflow and losing significant bits when converting between signed and unsigned types. If you mistakenly subtract 1 from 0 using signed integers it often more quickly causes your program to crash and makes it easier to find the bug than if it wraps around to 2^32 - 1, and compilers and static analysis tools and runtime checks have to assume you know what you're doing since you chose to use unsigned arithmetic. Also, negative numbers like -1 can often represent something useful, like a field being ignored/defaulted/unset while if you were using unsigned you'd have to reserve a special value like 2^32 - 1 or something similar.

Long ago, when memory was limited and processors did not automatically operate on 64 bits at once, every bit counted a lot more, so having signed vs unsigned bytes or shorts actually mattered a lot more often and was obviously the right design decision. Today just using a signed int is more than sufficient in almost all regular programming cases, and if your program really needs to use values bigger than 2^31 - 1, you often just want a long anyway. Once you're into the territory of using longs, it's even harder to come up with a reason why you really can't get by with 2^63 - 1 positive integers. Whenever we go to 128 bit processors it'll be even less of an issue.

在JDK8中，它确实提供了一些支持。

尽管有Gosling的担忧，但我们仍然可能看到Java对unsigned类型的完全支持。