我知道如何创建一个有String参数并返回int的方法的引用,它是:
Function<String, Integer>
然而,如果函数抛出异常,比如它被定义为:
Integer myMethod(String s) throws IOException
我该如何定义这个引用呢?
我知道如何创建一个有String参数并返回int的方法的引用,它是:
Function<String, Integer>
然而,如果函数抛出异常,比如它被定义为:
Integer myMethod(String s) throws IOException
我该如何定义这个引用呢?
当前回答
可以使用取消抛出包装器
Function<String, Integer> func1 = s -> Unthrow.wrap(() -> myMethod(s));
or
Function<String, Integer> func2 = s1 -> Unthrow.wrap((s2) -> myMethod(s2), s1);
其他回答
实际上,您可以使用一个处理异常的新接口来扩展Consumer(和Function等)——使用Java 8的默认方法!
考虑这个接口(扩展Consumer):
@FunctionalInterface
public interface ThrowingConsumer<T> extends Consumer<T> {
@Override
default void accept(final T elem) {
try {
acceptThrows(elem);
} catch (final Exception e) {
// Implement your own exception handling logic here..
// For example:
System.out.println("handling an exception...");
// Or ...
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
void acceptThrows(T elem) throws Exception;
}
然后,例如,如果你有一个列表:
final List<String> list = Arrays.asList("A", "B", "C");
如果你想消费它(例如。使用forEach)和一些抛出异常的代码,你通常会设置一个try/catch块:
final Consumer<String> consumer = aps -> {
try {
// maybe some other code here...
throw new Exception("asdas");
} catch (final Exception ex) {
System.out.println("handling an exception...");
}
};
list.forEach(consumer);
但是有了这个新接口,你可以用lambda表达式实例化它,编译器不会报错:
final ThrowingConsumer<String> throwingConsumer = aps -> {
// maybe some other code here...
throw new Exception("asdas");
};
list.forEach(throwingConsumer);
或者甚至只是转换它更简洁!:
list.forEach((ThrowingConsumer<String>) aps -> {
// maybe some other code here...
throw new Exception("asda");
});
更新
看起来榴莲有一个非常好的实用程序库,叫做Errors,可以用来解决这个问题,具有更大的灵活性。例如,在上面的实现中,我显式地定义了错误处理策略(System.out…或者抛出RuntimeException),而Durian的Errors允许您通过一套大型实用程序方法动态应用策略。感谢分享,@NedTwigg!
示例用法:
list.forEach(Errors.rethrow().wrap(c -> somethingThatThrows(c)));
我是一个小库的作者,它具有一些通用的魔法,可以在任何地方抛出任何Java异常,而不需要捕获它们,也不需要将它们包装到RuntimeException中。
用法: unchecked(() -> methodThrowingCheckedException())
public class UncheckedExceptions {
/**
* throws {@code exception} as unchecked exception, without wrapping exception.
*
* @return will never return anything, return type is set to {@code exception} only to be able to write <code>throw unchecked(exception)</code>
* @throws T {@code exception} as unchecked exception
*/
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T extends Throwable> T unchecked(Exception exception) throws T {
throw (T) exception;
}
@FunctionalInterface
public interface UncheckedFunction<R> {
R call() throws Exception;
}
/**
* Executes given function,
* catches and rethrows checked exceptions as unchecked exceptions, without wrapping exception.
*
* @return result of function
* @see #unchecked(Exception)
*/
public static <R> R unchecked(UncheckedFunction<R> function) {
try {
return function.call();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw unchecked(e);
}
}
@FunctionalInterface
public interface UncheckedMethod {
void call() throws Exception;
}
/**
* Executes given method,
* catches and rethrows checked exceptions as unchecked exceptions, without wrapping exception.
*
* @see #unchecked(Exception)
*/
public static void unchecked(UncheckedMethod method) {
try {
method.call();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw unchecked(e);
}
}
}
来源:https://github.com/qoomon/unchecked-exceptions-java
使用Function包装器的另一种解决方案是返回结果包装器的实例,如果一切正常,则返回成功,或者返回失败。
一些代码来澄清事情:
public interface ThrowableFunction<A, B> {
B apply(A a) throws Exception;
}
public abstract class Try<A> {
public static boolean isSuccess(Try tryy) {
return tryy instanceof Success;
}
public static <A, B> Function<A, Try<B>> tryOf(ThrowableFunction<A, B> function) {
return a -> {
try {
B result = function.apply(a);
return new Success<B>(result);
} catch (Exception e) {
return new Failure<>(e);
}
};
}
public abstract boolean isSuccess();
public boolean isError() {
return !isSuccess();
}
public abstract A getResult();
public abstract Exception getError();
}
public class Success<A> extends Try<A> {
private final A result;
public Success(A result) {
this.result = result;
}
@Override
public boolean isSuccess() {
return true;
}
@Override
public A getResult() {
return result;
}
@Override
public Exception getError() {
return new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object that) {
if(!(that instanceof Success)) {
return false;
}
return Objects.equal(result, ((Success) that).getResult());
}
}
public class Failure<A> extends Try<A> {
private final Exception exception;
public Failure(Exception exception) {
this.exception = exception;
}
@Override
public boolean isSuccess() {
return false;
}
@Override
public A getResult() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
@Override
public Exception getError() {
return exception;
}
}
一个简单的用例:
List<Try<Integer>> result = Lists.newArrayList(1, 2, 3).stream().
map(Try.<Integer, Integer>tryOf(i -> someMethodThrowingAnException(i))).
collect(Collectors.toList());
使用Jool库或JOOQ中的jOOλ库。它不仅提供了未经检查的异常处理接口,还为Seq类提供了许多有用的方法。
此外,它包含多达16个参数的功能接口。此外,它还提供了用于不同场景的Tuple类。
乔尔去链接
特别是在org.jooq.lambda.fi.util.function包的库查找中。它包含Java-8中所有带有前置Checked的接口。参考如下:-
Sneaky throw成语允许绕过Lambda表达式的CheckedException。将CheckedException包装在RuntimeException中不利于严格的错误处理。
它可以用作Java集合中使用的Consumer函数。
下面是jib答案的一个简单改进版本。
import static Throwing.rethrow;
@Test
public void testRethrow() {
thrown.expect(IOException.class);
thrown.expectMessage("i=3");
Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3).forEach(rethrow(e -> {
int i = e.intValue();
if (i == 3) {
throw new IOException("i=" + i);
}
}));
}
这只是在重新抛出中包装lambda。它使CheckedException重新抛出在lambda中抛出的任何异常。
public final class Throwing {
private Throwing() {}
@Nonnull
public static <T> Consumer<T> rethrow(@Nonnull final ThrowingConsumer<T> consumer) {
return consumer;
}
/**
* The compiler sees the signature with the throws T inferred to a RuntimeException type, so it
* allows the unchecked exception to propagate.
*
* http://www.baeldung.com/java-sneaky-throws
*/
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
@Nonnull
public static <E extends Throwable> void sneakyThrow(@Nonnull Throwable ex) throws E {
throw (E) ex;
}
}
在这里找到完整的代码和单元测试。