然而，你可以创建自己的FunctionalInterface，抛出如下..

@FunctionalInterface
public interface UseInstance<T, X extends Throwable> {
  void accept(T instance) throws X;
}

然后使用Lambdas或引用实现它，如下所示。

import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.io.IOException;

//lambda expressions and the execute around method (EAM) pattern to
//manage resources

public class FileWriterEAM  {
  private final FileWriter writer;

  private FileWriterEAM(final String fileName) throws IOException {
    writer = new FileWriter(fileName);
  }
  private void close() throws IOException {
    System.out.println("close called automatically...");
    writer.close();
  }
  public void writeStuff(final String message) throws IOException {
    writer.write(message);
  }
  //...

  public static void use(final String fileName, final UseInstance<FileWriterEAM, IOException> block) throws IOException {

    final FileWriterEAM writerEAM = new FileWriterEAM(fileName);    
    try {
      block.accept(writerEAM);
    } finally {
      writerEAM.close();
    }
  }

  public static void main(final String[] args) throws IOException {

    FileWriterEAM.use("eam.txt", writerEAM -> writerEAM.writeStuff("sweet"));

    FileWriterEAM.use("eam2.txt", writerEAM -> {
        writerEAM.writeStuff("how");
        writerEAM.writeStuff("sweet");      
      });

    FileWriterEAM.use("eam3.txt", FileWriterEAM::writeIt);     

  }


 void writeIt() throws IOException{
     this.writeStuff("How ");
     this.writeStuff("sweet ");
     this.writeStuff("it is");

 }

}

这里已经贴出了很多很棒的回复。只是试图用不同的角度来解决问题。这只是我的两毛钱，如果我哪里说错了，请指正。

在FunctionalInterface中抛出子句不是一个好主意

我认为强制抛出IOException可能不是一个好主意，原因如下

This looks to me like an anti-pattern to Stream/Lambda. The whole idea is that the caller will decide what code to provide and how to handle the exception. In many scenarios, the IOException might not be applicable for the client. For example, if the client is getting value from cache/memory instead of performing actual I/O. Also, the exceptions handling in streams becomes really hideous. For example, here is my code will look like if I use your API acceptMyMethod(s -> { try { Integer i = doSomeOperation(s); return i; } catch (IOException e) { // try catch block because of throws clause // in functional method, even though doSomeOperation // might not be throwing any exception at all. e.printStackTrace(); } return null; }); Ugly isn't it? Moreover, as I mentioned in my first point, that the doSomeOperation method may or may not be throwing IOException (depending on the implementation of the client/caller), but because of the throws clause in your FunctionalInterface method, I always have to write the try-catch.

如果我知道这个API抛出IOException怎么办

Then probably we are confusing FunctionalInterface with typical Interfaces. If you know this API will throw IOException, then most probably you also know some default/abstract behavior as well. I think you should define an interface and deploy your library (with default/abstract implementation) as follows public interface MyAmazingAPI { Integer myMethod(String s) throws IOException; } But, the try-catch problem still exists for the client. If I use your API in stream, I still need to handle IOException in hideous try-catch block. Provide a default stream-friendly API as follows public interface MyAmazingAPI { Integer myMethod(String s) throws IOException; default Optional<Integer> myMethod(String s, Consumer<? super Exception> exceptionConsumer) { try { return Optional.ofNullable(this.myMethod(s)); } catch (Exception e) { if (exceptionConsumer != null) { exceptionConsumer.accept(e); } else { e.printStackTrace(); } } return Optional.empty(); } } The default method takes the consumer object as argument, which will be responsible to handle the exception. Now, from client's point of view, the code will look like this strStream.map(str -> amazingAPIs.myMethod(str, Exception::printStackTrace)) .filter(Optional::isPresent) .map(Optional::get).collect(toList()); Nice right? Of course, logger or other handling logic could be used instead of Exception::printStackTrace. You can also expose a method similar to https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture.html#exceptionally-java.util.function.Function- . Meaning that you can expose another method, which will contain the exception from previous method call. The disadvantage is that you are now making your APIs stateful, which means that you need to handle thread-safety and which will be eventually become a performance hit. Just an option to consider though.

使用Function包装器的另一种解决方案是返回结果包装器的实例，如果一切正常，则返回成功，或者返回失败。

一些代码来澄清事情:

public interface ThrowableFunction<A, B> {
    B apply(A a) throws Exception;
}

public abstract class Try<A> {

    public static boolean isSuccess(Try tryy) {
        return tryy instanceof Success;
    }

    public static <A, B> Function<A, Try<B>> tryOf(ThrowableFunction<A, B> function) {
        return a -> {
            try {
                B result = function.apply(a);
                return new Success<B>(result);
            } catch (Exception e) {
                return new Failure<>(e);
            }
        };
    }

    public abstract boolean isSuccess();

    public boolean isError() {
        return !isSuccess();
    }

    public abstract A getResult();

    public abstract Exception getError();
}

public class Success<A> extends Try<A> {

    private final A result;

    public Success(A result) {
        this.result = result;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean isSuccess() {
        return true;
    }

    @Override
    public A getResult() {
        return result;
    }

    @Override
    public Exception getError() {
        return new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object that) {
        if(!(that instanceof Success)) {
            return false;
        }
        return Objects.equal(result, ((Success) that).getResult());
    }
}

public class Failure<A> extends Try<A> {

    private final Exception exception;

    public Failure(Exception exception) {
        this.exception = exception;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean isSuccess() {
        return false;
    }

    @Override
    public A getResult() {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public Exception getError() {
        return exception;
    }
}

一个简单的用例:

List<Try<Integer>> result = Lists.newArrayList(1, 2, 3).stream().
    map(Try.<Integer, Integer>tryOf(i -> someMethodThrowingAnException(i))).
    collect(Collectors.toList());

我使用一个名为unchecked()的重载实用程序函数来处理多个用例。

一些用法示例

unchecked(() -> new File("hello.txt").createNewFile());

boolean fileWasCreated = unchecked(() -> new File("hello.txt").createNewFile());

myFiles.forEach(unchecked(file -> new File(file.path).createNewFile()));

支持工具

public class UncheckedUtils {

    @FunctionalInterface
    public interface ThrowingConsumer<T> {
        void accept(T t) throws Exception;
    }

    @FunctionalInterface
    public interface ThrowingSupplier<T> {
        T get() throws Exception;
    }

    @FunctionalInterface
    public interface ThrowingRunnable {
        void run() throws Exception;
    }

    public static <T> Consumer<T> unchecked(
            ThrowingConsumer<T> throwingConsumer
    ) {
        return i -> {
            try {
                throwingConsumer.accept(i);
            } catch (Exception ex) {
                throw new RuntimeException(ex);
            }
        };
    }

    public static <T> T unchecked(
            ThrowingSupplier<T> throwingSupplier
    ) {
        try {
            return throwingSupplier.get();
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            throw new RuntimeException(ex);
        }
    }

    public static void unchecked(
            ThrowingRunnable throwing
    ) {
        try {
            throwing.run();
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            throw new RuntimeException(ex);
        }
    }
}

对我来说，首选的解决方案是使用Lombok。这是一个很好的图书馆。

而不是:

Integer myMethod(String s) throws IOException

你会有

import lombok.SneakyThrows;

@SneakyThrows
Integer myMethod(String s)

异常仍然被抛出，但您不需要使用throws声明它。

可以使用取消抛出包装器

Function<String, Integer> func1 = s -> Unthrow.wrap(() -> myMethod(s));

or

Function<String, Integer> func2 = s1 -> Unthrow.wrap((s2) -> myMethod(s2), s1);