看起来太“快速和肮脏”了，所以请指出缺点，但我发现有用的是……

在我的AsyncTask的onPostExecute方法中，我简单地包装了`。try/catch块中的进度对话框(带有空捕获)的Dismiss '，然后简单地忽略所引发的异常。似乎是错误的，但似乎没有不良影响(至少对于我随后所做的事情，这是启动另一个活动，将我的长时间运行查询的结果传递为一个额外)

我什么都试过了。花了几天时间做实验。我不想阻止活动旋转。我的设想是:

向用户显示动态信息的进度对话框。例如:“连接到服务器…”，“下载数据…”，等等。 一个线程做繁重的工作，更新对话框 在最后用结果更新UI。

The problem was, when rotating the screen, every solution on the book failed. Even with the AsyncTask class, which is the correct Android way of dealing with this situations. When rotating the screen, the current Context that the starting thread is working with, is gone, and that messes up with the dialog that is showing. The problem was always the Dialog, no matter how many tricks I added to the code (passing new contexts to running threads, retaining thread states through rotations, etc...). The code complexity at the end was always huge and there was always something that could go wrong.

对我来说唯一有效的解决方案就是“活动/对话”技巧。这很简单，很天才，而且都是旋转证明:

Instead of creating a Dialog and ask to show it, create an Activity that has been set in the manifest with android:theme="@android:style/Theme.Dialog". So, it just looks like a dialog. Replace showDialog(DIALOG_ID) with startActivityForResult(yourActivityDialog, yourCode); Use onActivityResult in the calling Activity to get the results from the executing thread (even the errors) and update the UI. On your 'ActivityDialog', use threads or AsyncTask to execute long tasks and onRetainNonConfigurationInstance to save "dialog" state when rotating the screen.

这是快速和工作良好。我仍然使用对话框的其他任务和AsyncTask的一些东西，不需要一个固定的对话框在屏幕上。但在这种情况下，我总是使用活动/对话框模式。

而且，我没有尝试它，但它甚至可以阻止活动/对话框旋转，当线程运行时，加速事情，同时允许调用活动旋转。

我是这样做的:

    package com.palewar;
    import android.app.Activity;
    import android.app.ProgressDialog;
    import android.os.Bundle;
    import android.os.Handler;
    import android.os.Message;

    public class ThreadActivity extends Activity {


        static ProgressDialog dialog;
        private Thread downloadThread;
        final static Handler handler = new Handler() {

            @Override
            public void handleMessage(Message msg) {

                super.handleMessage(msg);

                dialog.dismiss();

            }

        };

        protected void onDestroy() {
    super.onDestroy();
            if (dialog != null && dialog.isShowing()) {
                dialog.dismiss();
                dialog = null;
            }

        }

        /** Called when the activity is first created. */
        @Override
        public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
            super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
            setContentView(R.layout.main);

            downloadThread = (Thread) getLastNonConfigurationInstance();
            if (downloadThread != null && downloadThread.isAlive()) {
                dialog = ProgressDialog.show(ThreadActivity.this, "",
                        "Signing in...", false);
            }

            dialog = ProgressDialog.show(ThreadActivity.this, "",
                    "Signing in ...", false);

            downloadThread = new MyThread();
            downloadThread.start();
            // processThread();
        }

        // Save the thread
        @Override
        public Object onRetainNonConfigurationInstance() {
            return downloadThread;
        }


        static public class MyThread extends Thread {
            @Override
            public void run() {

                try {
                    // Simulate a slow network
                    try {
                        new Thread().sleep(5000);
                    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                        e.printStackTrace();
                    }
                    handler.sendEmptyMessage(0);

                } finally {

                }
            }
        }

    }

你也可以试着让我知道它对你是否有效

我发现了一个更容易的解决方案来处理线程时，方向改变。你可以只保留一个静态引用到你的活动/片段，并在对ui进行操作之前验证它是否为空。我建议使用try catch:

 public class DashListFragment extends Fragment {
     private static DashListFragment ACTIVE_INSTANCE;

     @Override
     public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
        super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);

        ACTIVE_INSTANCE = this;

        new Handler().postDelayed(new Runnable() {
            public void run() {
                try {
                        if (ACTIVE_INSTANCE != null) {
                            setAdapter(); // this method do something on ui or use context
                        }
                }
                catch (Exception e) {}


            }
        }, 1500l);

    }

    @Override
    public void onDestroy() {
        super.onDestroy();

        ACTIVE_INSTANCE = null;
    }


}

If you're struggling with detecting orientation change events of a dialog INDEPENDENT OF AN ACTIVITY REFERENCE, this method works excitingly well. I use this because I have my own dialog class that can be shown in multiple different Activities so I don't always know which Activity it's being shown in. With this method you don't need to change the AndroidManifest, worry about Activity references, and you don't need a custom dialog (as I have). You do need, however, a custom content view so you can detect the orientation changes using that particular view. Here's my example:

设置

public class MyContentView extends View{
    public MyContentView(Context context){
        super(context);
    }

    @Override
    public void onConfigurationChanged(Configuration newConfig){
        super.onConfigurationChanged(newConfig);

        //DO SOMETHING HERE!! :D
    }
}

实现1 -对话

Dialog dialog = new Dialog(context);
//set up dialog
dialog.setContentView(new MyContentView(context));
dialog.show();

实现2 - AlertDialog。构建器

AlertDialog.Builder builder = new AlertDialog.Builder(context);
//set up dialog builder
builder.setView(new MyContentView(context));        //Can use this method
builder.setCustomTitle(new MycontentView(context)); // or this method
builder.build().show();

实现3 - ProgressDialog / AlertDialog

ProgressDialog progress = new ProgressDialog(context);
//set up progress dialog
progress.setView(new MyContentView(context));        //Can use this method
progress.setCustomTitle(new MyContentView(context)); // or this method
progress.show();

看起来太“快速和肮脏”了，所以请指出缺点，但我发现有用的是……

在我的AsyncTask的onPostExecute方法中，我简单地包装了`。try/catch块中的进度对话框(带有空捕获)的Dismiss '，然后简单地忽略所引发的异常。似乎是错误的，但似乎没有不良影响(至少对于我随后所做的事情，这是启动另一个活动，将我的长时间运行查询的结果传递为一个额外)