这段代码不涉及编译器标志或直接运行时调用:

SEL selector = @selector(zeroArgumentMethod);
NSMethodSignature *methodSig = [[self class] instanceMethodSignatureForSelector:selector];
NSInvocation *invocation = [NSInvocation invocationWithMethodSignature:methodSig];
[invocation setSelector:selector];
[invocation setTarget:self];
[invocation invoke];

NSInvocation允许设置多个参数，因此与performSelector不同，这将适用于任何方法。

在项目生成设置中，在其他警告标志(WARNING_CFLAGS)下添加 -Wno-arc-performSelector-leaks

现在只需确保所调用的选择器不会导致对象被保留或复制。

我没有使用块方法，这给我带来了一些问题:

    IMP imp = [_controller methodForSelector:selector];
    void (*func)(id, SEL) = (void *)imp;

我将使用NSInvocation，像这样:

    -(void) sendSelectorToDelegate:(SEL) selector withSender:(UIButton *)button 

    if ([delegate respondsToSelector:selector])
    {
    NSMethodSignature * methodSignature = [[delegate class]
                                    instanceMethodSignatureForSelector:selector];
    NSInvocation * delegateInvocation = [NSInvocation
                                   invocationWithMethodSignature:methodSignature];


    [delegateInvocation setSelector:selector];
    [delegateInvocation setTarget:delegate];

    // remember the first two parameter are cmd and self
    [delegateInvocation setArgument:&button atIndex:2];
    [delegateInvocation invoke];
    }

在Xcode 4.2的LLVM 3.0编译器中，你可以像下面这样抑制警告:

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    [self.ticketTarget performSelector: self.ticketAction withObject: self];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop

如果你在几个地方得到错误，并且想要使用C宏系统来隐藏指令，你可以定义一个宏来更容易地抑制警告:

#define SuppressPerformSelectorLeakWarning(Stuff) \
    do { \
        _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
        _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Warc-performSelector-leaks\"") \
        Stuff; \
        _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
    } while (0)

你可以像这样使用宏:

SuppressPerformSelectorLeakWarning(
    [_target performSelector:_action withObject:self]
);

如果你需要执行消息的结果，你可以这样做:

id result;
SuppressPerformSelectorLeakWarning(
    result = [_target performSelector:_action withObject:self]
);

Matt Galloway的回答解释了原因:

考虑以下几点: id anotherObject1 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(copy)]; id anotherObject2 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(giveMeAnotherNonRetainedObject)]; 现在，ARC如何知道第一个返回一个保留计数为1的对象，而第二个 返回一个自动释放的对象?

如果您忽略了返回值，那么抑制警告似乎通常是安全的。如果你真的需要从performSelector获取一个保留对象，我不确定最好的做法是什么——除了“不要这样做”。

下面是基于上面给出的答案更新的宏。这应该允许您使用return语句来包装代码。

#define SUPPRESS_PERFORM_SELECTOR_LEAK_WARNING(code)                        \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push")                                        \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Warc-performSelector-leaks\"")     \
    code;                                                                   \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop")                                         \


SUPPRESS_PERFORM_SELECTOR_LEAK_WARNING(
    return [_target performSelector:_action withObject:self]
);