我没有使用块方法，这给我带来了一些问题:

    IMP imp = [_controller methodForSelector:selector];
    void (*func)(id, SEL) = (void *)imp;

我将使用NSInvocation，像这样:

    -(void) sendSelectorToDelegate:(SEL) selector withSender:(UIButton *)button 

    if ([delegate respondsToSelector:selector])
    {
    NSMethodSignature * methodSignature = [[delegate class]
                                    instanceMethodSignatureForSelector:selector];
    NSInvocation * delegateInvocation = [NSInvocation
                                   invocationWithMethodSignature:methodSignature];


    [delegateInvocation setSelector:selector];
    [delegateInvocation setTarget:delegate];

    // remember the first two parameter are cmd and self
    [delegateInvocation setArgument:&button atIndex:2];
    [delegateInvocation invoke];
    }

奇怪但事实是:如果可以接受(即result为void并且你不介意让runloop循环一次)，添加一个延迟，即使这是零:

[_controller performSelector:NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod")
    withObject:nil
    afterDelay:0];

这删除了警告，大概是因为它向编译器保证没有对象可以返回，并且在某种程度上管理不当。

我没有使用块方法，这给我带来了一些问题:

    IMP imp = [_controller methodForSelector:selector];
    void (*func)(id, SEL) = (void *)imp;

我将使用NSInvocation，像这样:

    -(void) sendSelectorToDelegate:(SEL) selector withSender:(UIButton *)button 

    if ([delegate respondsToSelector:selector])
    {
    NSMethodSignature * methodSignature = [[delegate class]
                                    instanceMethodSignatureForSelector:selector];
    NSInvocation * delegateInvocation = [NSInvocation
                                   invocationWithMethodSignature:methodSignature];


    [delegateInvocation setSelector:selector];
    [delegateInvocation setTarget:delegate];

    // remember the first two parameter are cmd and self
    [delegateInvocation setArgument:&button atIndex:2];
    [delegateInvocation invoke];
    }

这里有很多答案，但由于这个有点不同，我把几个答案结合起来，我想我应该把它放进去。我使用一个NSObject类别检查，以确保选择器返回void，也抑制编译器警告。

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <objc/runtime.h>
#import "Debug.h" // not given; just an assert

@interface NSObject (Extras)

// Enforce the rule that the selector used must return void.
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object;
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector;

@end

@implementation NSObject (Extras)

// Apparently the reason the regular performSelect gives a compile time warning is that the system doesn't know the return type. I'm going to (a) make sure that the return type is void, and (b) disable this warning
// See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7017281/performselector-may-cause-a-leak-because-its-selector-is-unknown

- (void) checkSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    // See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14602854/objective-c-is-there-a-way-to-check-a-selector-return-value
    Method m = class_getInstanceMethod([self class], aSelector);
    char type[128];
    method_getReturnType(m, type, sizeof(type));

    NSString *message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"NSObject+Extras.performVoidReturnSelector: %@.%@ selector (type: %s)", [self class], NSStringFromSelector(aSelector), type];
    NSLog(@"%@", message);

    if (type[0] != 'v') {
        message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"%@ was not void", message];
        [Debug assertTrue:FALSE withMessage:message];
    }
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    // Since the selector (aSelector) is returning void, it doesn't make sense to try to obtain the return result of performSelector. In fact, if we do, it crashes the app.
    [self performSelector: aSelector withObject: object];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop    
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    [self performSelector: aSelector];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop
}

@end

Matt Galloway的回答解释了原因:

考虑以下几点: id anotherObject1 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(copy)]; id anotherObject2 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(giveMeAnotherNonRetainedObject)]; 现在，ARC如何知道第一个返回一个保留计数为1的对象，而第二个 返回一个自动释放的对象?

如果您忽略了返回值，那么抑制警告似乎通常是安全的。如果你真的需要从performSelector获取一个保留对象，我不确定最好的做法是什么——除了“不要这样做”。

不要压制警告!

有不少于12个可选的解决方案来修补编译器。 虽然在第一次实现时你很聪明，但地球上很少有工程师能追随你的脚步，而这段代码最终会崩溃。

安全的路线:

所有这些解决方案都是可行的，只是在一定程度上与您的初衷有所不同。假设param可以为nil:

安全路线，相同的概念行为:

// GREAT
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES];
[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

安全路线，行为稍有不同:

(见此回复) 使用任何线程代替[NSThread主线程]。

// GOOD
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument afterDelay:0];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument afterDelay:0 inModes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelectorInBackground:selector withObject:anArgument];

[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

危险的路线

需要某种编译器静音，这是必然的破坏。请注意，目前，它确实在Swift中中断了。

// AT YOUR OWN RISK
[_controller performSelector:selector];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument withObject:nil];