为了子孙后代着想，我决定参加竞选:)

最近，我看到越来越多的重构偏离了目标/选择器范式，而倾向于协议、块等。然而，我已经使用过几次的performSelector有一个替代物:

[NSApp sendAction: NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod") to: _controller from: nil];

这些似乎是一个干净的，弧安全的，和几乎相同的替代performSelector没有太多的objc_msgSend()。

不过，我不知道iOS上是否有类似的功能。

下面是基于上面给出的答案更新的宏。这应该允许您使用return语句来包装代码。

#define SUPPRESS_PERFORM_SELECTOR_LEAK_WARNING(code)                        \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push")                                        \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Warc-performSelector-leaks\"")     \
    code;                                                                   \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop")                                         \


SUPPRESS_PERFORM_SELECTOR_LEAK_WARNING(
    return [_target performSelector:_action withObject:self]
);

这段代码不涉及编译器标志或直接运行时调用:

SEL selector = @selector(zeroArgumentMethod);
NSMethodSignature *methodSig = [[self class] instanceMethodSignatureForSelector:selector];
NSInvocation *invocation = [NSInvocation invocationWithMethodSignature:methodSig];
[invocation setSelector:selector];
[invocation setTarget:self];
[invocation invoke];

NSInvocation允许设置多个参数，因此与performSelector不同，这将适用于任何方法。

在编译器允许覆盖警告之前，可以使用运行时作为一种变通方法。

你需要标题:

#import <objc/message.h>

然后试试下面的方法:

// For strict compilers.
((id(*)(id,SEL))objc_msgSend)(_controller, sel_getUid("someMethod"));

OR

// Old answer's code:
objc_msgSend(_controller, NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod"));

而不是:

[_controller performSelector:NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod")];

@c-road在这里提供了正确的问题描述链接。下面您可以看到我的示例，当performSelector导致内存泄漏时。

@interface Dummy : NSObject <NSCopying>
@end

@implementation Dummy

- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
  return [[Dummy alloc] init];
}

- (id)clone {
  return [[Dummy alloc] init];
}

@end

void CopyDummy(Dummy *dummy) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy copy];
}

void CloneDummy(Dummy *dummy) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy clone];
}

void CopyDummyWithLeak(Dummy *dummy, SEL copySelector) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy performSelector:copySelector];
}

void CloneDummyWithoutLeak(Dummy *dummy, SEL cloneSelector) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy performSelector:cloneSelector];
}

int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
  @autoreleasepool {
    Dummy *dummy = [[Dummy alloc] init];
    for (;;) { @autoreleasepool {
      //CopyDummy(dummy);
      //CloneDummy(dummy);
      //CloneDummyWithoutLeak(dummy, @selector(clone));
      CopyDummyWithLeak(dummy, @selector(copy));
      [NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:1];
    }} 
  }
  return 0;
}

在我的例子中，唯一导致内存泄漏的方法是CopyDummyWithLeak。原因是ARC不知道，copySelector返回retain object。

如果你运行内存泄漏工具，你可以看到下面的图片: .．.在其他任何情况下都没有内存泄漏:

这里有很多答案，但由于这个有点不同，我把几个答案结合起来，我想我应该把它放进去。我使用一个NSObject类别检查，以确保选择器返回void，也抑制编译器警告。

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <objc/runtime.h>
#import "Debug.h" // not given; just an assert

@interface NSObject (Extras)

// Enforce the rule that the selector used must return void.
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object;
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector;

@end

@implementation NSObject (Extras)

// Apparently the reason the regular performSelect gives a compile time warning is that the system doesn't know the return type. I'm going to (a) make sure that the return type is void, and (b) disable this warning
// See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7017281/performselector-may-cause-a-leak-because-its-selector-is-unknown

- (void) checkSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    // See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14602854/objective-c-is-there-a-way-to-check-a-selector-return-value
    Method m = class_getInstanceMethod([self class], aSelector);
    char type[128];
    method_getReturnType(m, type, sizeof(type));

    NSString *message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"NSObject+Extras.performVoidReturnSelector: %@.%@ selector (type: %s)", [self class], NSStringFromSelector(aSelector), type];
    NSLog(@"%@", message);

    if (type[0] != 'v') {
        message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"%@ was not void", message];
        [Debug assertTrue:FALSE withMessage:message];
    }
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    // Since the selector (aSelector) is returning void, it doesn't make sense to try to obtain the return result of performSelector. In fact, if we do, it crashes the app.
    [self performSelector: aSelector withObject: object];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop    
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    [self performSelector: aSelector];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop
}

@end