Matt Galloway的回答解释了原因:

考虑以下几点: id anotherObject1 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(copy)]; id anotherObject2 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(giveMeAnotherNonRetainedObject)]; 现在，ARC如何知道第一个返回一个保留计数为1的对象，而第二个 返回一个自动释放的对象?

如果您忽略了返回值，那么抑制警告似乎通常是安全的。如果你真的需要从performSelector获取一个保留对象，我不确定最好的做法是什么——除了“不要这样做”。

在项目生成设置中，在其他警告标志(WARNING_CFLAGS)下添加 -Wno-arc-performSelector-leaks

现在只需确保所调用的选择器不会导致对象被保留或复制。

Matt Galloway的回答解释了原因:

考虑以下几点: id anotherObject1 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(copy)]; id anotherObject2 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(giveMeAnotherNonRetainedObject)]; 现在，ARC如何知道第一个返回一个保留计数为1的对象，而第二个 返回一个自动释放的对象?

如果您忽略了返回值，那么抑制警告似乎通常是安全的。如果你真的需要从performSelector获取一个保留对象，我不确定最好的做法是什么——除了“不要这样做”。

这段代码不涉及编译器标志或直接运行时调用:

SEL selector = @selector(zeroArgumentMethod);
NSMethodSignature *methodSig = [[self class] instanceMethodSignatureForSelector:selector];
NSInvocation *invocation = [NSInvocation invocationWithMethodSignature:methodSig];
[invocation setSelector:selector];
[invocation setTarget:self];
[invocation invoke];

NSInvocation允许设置多个参数，因此与performSelector不同，这将适用于任何方法。

这里有很多答案，但由于这个有点不同，我把几个答案结合起来，我想我应该把它放进去。我使用一个NSObject类别检查，以确保选择器返回void，也抑制编译器警告。

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <objc/runtime.h>
#import "Debug.h" // not given; just an assert

@interface NSObject (Extras)

// Enforce the rule that the selector used must return void.
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object;
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector;

@end

@implementation NSObject (Extras)

// Apparently the reason the regular performSelect gives a compile time warning is that the system doesn't know the return type. I'm going to (a) make sure that the return type is void, and (b) disable this warning
// See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7017281/performselector-may-cause-a-leak-because-its-selector-is-unknown

- (void) checkSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    // See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14602854/objective-c-is-there-a-way-to-check-a-selector-return-value
    Method m = class_getInstanceMethod([self class], aSelector);
    char type[128];
    method_getReturnType(m, type, sizeof(type));

    NSString *message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"NSObject+Extras.performVoidReturnSelector: %@.%@ selector (type: %s)", [self class], NSStringFromSelector(aSelector), type];
    NSLog(@"%@", message);

    if (type[0] != 'v') {
        message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"%@ was not void", message];
        [Debug assertTrue:FALSE withMessage:message];
    }
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    // Since the selector (aSelector) is returning void, it doesn't make sense to try to obtain the return result of performSelector. In fact, if we do, it crashes the app.
    [self performSelector: aSelector withObject: object];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop    
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    [self performSelector: aSelector];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop
}

@end

为了子孙后代着想，我决定参加竞选:)

最近，我看到越来越多的重构偏离了目标/选择器范式，而倾向于协议、块等。然而，我已经使用过几次的performSelector有一个替代物:

[NSApp sendAction: NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod") to: _controller from: nil];

这些似乎是一个干净的，弧安全的，和几乎相同的替代performSelector没有太多的objc_msgSend()。

不过，我不知道iOS上是否有类似的功能。