I use static final to declare constants and go with the ALL_CAPS naming notation. I have seen quite a few real life instances where all constants are bunched together into an interface. A few posts have rightly called that a bad practice, primarily because that's not what an interface is for. An interface should enforce a contract and should not be a place to put unrelated constants in. Putting it together into a class that cannot be instantiated (through a private constructor) too is fine if the constant semantics don't belong to a specific class(es). I always put a constant in the class that it's most related to, because that makes sense and is also easily maintainable.

枚举是表示一组值的好选择，但是如果您要存储强调绝对值的独立常量(例如。TIMEOUT = 100 ms)你可以直接使用静态的final方法。

一个好的面向对象设计不应该需要很多公开可用的常量。大多数常量都应该封装在需要它们完成工作的类中。

我强烈建议不要只使用一个常量类。这在当时看起来是一个好主意，但是当开发人员拒绝记录常量，并且类增长到包含500个以上彼此完全不相关的常量(与应用程序的完全不同方面相关)时，通常会导致常量文件完全不可读。而不是:

If you have access to Java 5+, use enums to define your specific constants for an application area. All parts of the application area should refer to enums, not constant values, for these constants. You may declare an enum similar to how you declare a class. Enums are perhaps the most (and, arguably, only) useful feature of Java 5+. If you have constants that are only valid to a particular class or one of its subclasses, declare them as either protected or public and place them on the top class in the hierarchy. This way, the subclasses can access these constant values (and if other classes access them via public, the constants aren't only valid to a particular class...which means that the external classes using this constant may be too tightly coupled to the class containing the constant) If you have an interface with behavior defined, but returned values or argument values should be particular, it is perfectly acceptible to define constants on that interface so that other implementors will have access to them. However, avoid creating an interface just to hold constants: it can become just as bad as a class created just to hold constants.

在Java中实现常量的最佳方法是什么?

我们应该避免的一种方法是:使用接口来定义常量。

创建专门用于声明常量的接口实际上是最糟糕的事情:它违背了设计接口的初衷:定义方法契约。

即使已经存在一个接口来满足特定的需求，在其中声明常量也没有意义，因为常量不应该成为API和提供给客户端类的契约的一部分。

---

为了简化，我们有4种有效的方法。

使用静态的最终字符串/整数字段:

1)使用在内部声明常量的类。 1变体)创建一个专门用于声明常量的类。

Java 5 enum:

2)在相关的目的类(嵌套类)中声明枚举。 2变体)创建枚举作为一个独立的类(在它自己的类文件中定义)。

---

TLDR:哪个是最好的方法，在哪里找到常数?

In most of cases, the enum way is probably finer than the static final String/Integer way and personally I think that the static final String/Integer way should be used only if we have good reasons to not use enums. And about where we should declare the constant values, the idea is to search whether there is a single existing class that owns a specific and strong functional cohesion with constant values. If we find such a class, we should use it as the constants holder. Otherwise, the constant should be associated to no one particular class.

---

静态final字符串/静态final整数vs enum

Enums usage is really a way to strongly considered. Enums have a great advantage over String or Integer constant field. They set a stronger compilation constraint. If you define a method that takes the enum as parameter, you can only pass a enum value defined in the enum class(or null). With String and Integer you can substitute them with any values of compatible type and the compilation will be fine even if the value is not a defined constant in the static final String/ static final Integer fields.

例如，下面两个在类中定义为静态final String字段的常量:

public class MyClass{

   public static final String ONE_CONSTANT = "value";
   public static final String ANOTHER_CONSTANT = "other value";
   . . .
}

下面是一个方法，它期望将这些常量中的一个作为参数:

public void process(String constantExpected){
    ...    
}

你可以这样调用它:

process(MyClass.ONE_CONSTANT);

or

process(MyClass.ANOTHER_CONSTANT);

但是没有编译约束阻止你以这种方式调用它:

process("a not defined constant value");

只有在运行时才会出现错误，并且只有在一次检查传输的值时才会出现错误。

对于enum，不需要检查，因为客户端只能在enum参数中传递enum值。

例如，这里有两个在枚举类中定义的值(所以是常量):

public enum MyEnum {

    ONE_CONSTANT("value"), ANOTHER_CONSTANT(" another value");

    private String value;

    MyEnum(String value) {
       this.value = value;
    }
         ...
}

下面是一个方法，它期望将这些枚举值中的一个作为参数:

public void process(MyEnum myEnum){
    ...    
}

你可以这样调用它:

process(MyEnum.ONE_CONSTANT);

or

process(MyEnum.ANOTHER_CONSTANT);

但是编译永远不会允许你以这种方式调用它:

process("a not defined constant value");

---

我们应该在哪里声明常数?

如果您的应用程序包含一个现有的类，该类拥有特定的和强大的常量值函数内聚，则1)和2)看起来更直观。 一般来说，如果常量是在操纵它们的主类中声明的，或者有一个很自然的名字，我们可以在里面找到它，那么使用起来会更容易。

例如，在JDK库中，在一个不仅声明常量声明的类(java.lang.Math)中声明了指数和π常数值。

   public final class Math {
          ...
       public static final double E = 2.7182818284590452354;
       public static final double PI = 3.14159265358979323846;
         ...
   }

使用数学函数的客户端经常依赖于Math类。 因此，他们可以很容易地找到常数，也可以很自然地记住E和的定义。

If your application doesn't contain an existing class that has a very specific and strong functional cohesion with the constant values, the 1 variant) and the 2 variant) ways appear more intuitive. Generally, it doesn't ease the use of the constants if these are declared in one class that manipulates them while we have also 3 or 4 other classes that manipulate them as much as and no one of these classes seems be more natural than others to host constant values. Here, defining a custom class to hold only constant values makes sense. For example in the JDK library, the java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit enum is not declared in a specific class as there is not really one and only one JDK specific class that appear as the most intuitive to hold it :

public enum TimeUnit {
    NANOSECONDS {
      .....
    },
    MICROSECONDS {
      .....
    },
    MILLISECONDS {
      .....
    },
    SECONDS {
      .....
    },
      .....
}      

在java.util.concurrent中声明的许多类都使用它们: BlockingQueue, ArrayBlockingQueue<E>， CompletableFuture, ExecutorService，…实际上，似乎没有谁比他们更适合主持这次全会。

只是要避免使用接口:

public interface MyConstants {
    String CONSTANT_ONE = "foo";
}

public class NeddsConstant implements MyConstants {

}

这很诱人，但违反了封装，并且模糊了类定义的区别。

有一定的观点来回答这个问题。首先，java中的常量通常被声明为public、static和final。原因如下:

public, so that they are accessible from everywhere
static, so that they can be accessed without any instance. Since they are constants it
  makes little sense to duplicate them for every object.
final, since they should not be allowed to change

我永远不会为CONSTANTS访问器/对象使用接口，因为接口通常是需要实现的。这看起来是不是很有趣:

String myConstant = IMyInterface.CONSTANTX;

相反，我会在一些不同的方法中进行选择，基于一些小的权衡，所以这取决于你需要什么:

1.  Use a regular enum with a default/private constructor. Most people would define 
     constants this way, IMHO.
  - drawback: cannot effectively Javadoc each constant member
  - advantage: var members are implicitly public, static, and final
  - advantage: type-safe
  - provides "a limited constructor" in a special way that only takes args which match
     predefined 'public static final' keys, thus limiting what you can pass to the
     constructor

2.  Use a altered enum WITHOUT a constructor, having all variables defined with 
     prefixed 'public static final' .
  - looks funny just having a floating semi-colon in the code
  - advantage: you can JavaDoc each variable with an explanation
  - drawback: you still have to put explicit 'public static final' before each variable
  - drawback: not type-safe
  - no 'limited constructor'

3.  Use a Class with a private constructor:
  - advantage: you can JavaDoc each variable with an explanation
  - drawback: you have to put explicit 'public static final' before each variable
  - you have the option of having a constructor to create an instance
     of the class if you want to provide additional functions related
     to your constants 
     (or just keep the constructor private)
  - drawback: not type-safe

4. Using interface:
  - advantage: you can JavaDoc each variable with an explanation
  - advantage: var members are implicitly 'public static final'
  - you are able to define default interface methods if you want to provide additional
     functions related to your constants (only if you implement the interface)
  - drawback: not type-safe