我见过这样的例子:

public class MaxSeconds {
   public static final int MAX_SECONDS = 25;
}

假设我可以有一个Constants类来包装常量,并将它们声明为静态final。我几乎不知道Java,我想知道这是否是创建常量的最佳方式。


当前回答

根据上面的评论,我认为这是一个很好的方法,将老式的全局常量类(具有公共静态final变量)更改为类似枚举的等价物,如下所示:

public class Constants {

    private Constants() {
        throw new AssertionError();
    }

    public interface ConstantType {}

    public enum StringConstant implements ConstantType {
        DB_HOST("localhost");
        // other String constants come here

        private String value;
        private StringConstant(String value) {
            this.value = value;
        }
        public String value() {
            return value;
        }
    }

    public enum IntConstant implements ConstantType {
        DB_PORT(3128), 
        MAX_PAGE_SIZE(100);
        // other int constants come here

        private int value;
        private IntConstant(int value) {
            this.value = value;
        }
        public int value() {
            return value;
        }
    }

    public enum SimpleConstant implements ConstantType {
        STATE_INIT,
        STATE_START,
        STATE_END;
    }

}

这样我就可以把它们引用为:

Constants.StringConstant.DB_HOST

其他回答

有一定的观点来回答这个问题。首先,java中的常量通常被声明为public、static和final。原因如下:

public, so that they are accessible from everywhere
static, so that they can be accessed without any instance. Since they are constants it
  makes little sense to duplicate them for every object.
final, since they should not be allowed to change

我永远不会为CONSTANTS访问器/对象使用接口,因为接口通常是需要实现的。这看起来是不是很有趣:

String myConstant = IMyInterface.CONSTANTX;

相反,我会在一些不同的方法中进行选择,基于一些小的权衡,所以这取决于你需要什么:

1.  Use a regular enum with a default/private constructor. Most people would define 
     constants this way, IMHO.
  - drawback: cannot effectively Javadoc each constant member
  - advantage: var members are implicitly public, static, and final
  - advantage: type-safe
  - provides "a limited constructor" in a special way that only takes args which match
     predefined 'public static final' keys, thus limiting what you can pass to the
     constructor

2.  Use a altered enum WITHOUT a constructor, having all variables defined with 
     prefixed 'public static final' .
  - looks funny just having a floating semi-colon in the code
  - advantage: you can JavaDoc each variable with an explanation
  - drawback: you still have to put explicit 'public static final' before each variable
  - drawback: not type-safe
  - no 'limited constructor'

3.  Use a Class with a private constructor:
  - advantage: you can JavaDoc each variable with an explanation
  - drawback: you have to put explicit 'public static final' before each variable
  - you have the option of having a constructor to create an instance
     of the class if you want to provide additional functions related
     to your constants 
     (or just keep the constructor private)
  - drawback: not type-safe

4. Using interface:
  - advantage: you can JavaDoc each variable with an explanation
  - advantage: var members are implicitly 'public static final'
  - you are able to define default interface methods if you want to provide additional
     functions related to your constants (only if you implement the interface)
  - drawback: not type-safe

我这样做的方法之一是通过创建一个具有常量值的“全局”类,并在需要访问常量的类中进行静态导入。

我同意大多数人所说的,在处理常量集合时最好使用枚举。然而,如果你在Android上编程,有一个更好的解决方案:IntDef Annotation。

@Retention(SOURCE)
@IntDef({NAVIGATION_MODE_STANDARD, NAVIGATION_MODE_LIST,NAVIGATION_MODE_TABS})
public @interface NavigationMode {}
public static final int NAVIGATION_MODE_STANDARD = 0;
public static final int NAVIGATION_MODE_LIST = 1;
public static final int NAVIGATION_MODE_TABS = 2;
...
public abstract void setNavigationMode(@NavigationMode int mode);
@NavigationMode
public abstract int getNavigationMode();

IntDef注释在一个简单的方面优于枚举,它占用的空间明显更少,因为它只是一个编译时标记。它不是一个类,也没有自动字符串转换属性。

我同意使用界面不是正确的方法。在Bloch的《Effective Java》中,避免这种模式甚至有自己的项目(#18)。

Bloch反对常量接口模式的一个论点是,常量的使用是一个实现细节,但是实现一个使用它们的接口会在导出的API中暴露该实现细节。

public|private static final TYPE NAME = VALUE;模式是一种声明常数的好方法。就我个人而言,我认为最好避免创建一个单独的类来存放所有的常量,但除了个人偏好和风格之外,我还没有看到不这样做的理由。

如果常量可以很好地建模为枚举,请考虑1.5或更高版本中可用的枚举结构。

如果您使用的是1.5以前的版本,您仍然可以通过使用普通的Java类来实现类型安全枚举。(详见这个网站)。

静态final是我的偏好,我只使用enum如果项目确实是可枚举的。