你可以设置一个本地SSH隧道，例如，如果你想要端口80击中你的应用绑定到3000:

sudo ssh $USERNAME@localhost -L 80:localhost:3000 -N

这样做的优点是可以使用脚本服务器，而且非常简单。

使用privbind实用程序:它允许非特权应用程序绑定到预留端口。

您可以进行端口重定向。这就是我为运行在Linux机器上的Silverlight策略服务器所做的工作

iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 943 -j REDIRECT --to-port 1300

出于某种原因，没有人提到降低sysctl net.ipv4。Ip_unprivileged_port_start到您需要的值。 示例:我们需要将应用程序绑定到443端口。

sysctl net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=443

有些人可能会说，存在潜在的安全问题:非特权用户现在可能绑定到其他特权端口(444-1024)。 但是你可以用iptables通过阻塞其他端口轻松解决这个问题:

iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 444:1024 -j DROP
iptables -I INPUT -p udp --dport 444:1024 -j DROP

与其他方法的比较。这个方法:

from some point is (IMO) even more secure than setting CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE/setuid, since an application doesn't setuid at all, even partly (capabilities actually are). For example, to catch a coredump of capability-enabled application you will need to change sysctl fs.suid_dumpable (which leads to another potential security problems) Also, when CAP/suid is set, /proc/PID directory is owned by root, so your non-root user will not have full information/control of running process, for example, user will not be able (in common case) to determine which connections belong to application via /proc/PID/fd/ (netstat -aptn | grep PID). has security disadvantage: while your app (or any app that uses ports 443-1024) is down for some reason, another app could take the port. But this problem could also be applied to CAP/suid (in case you set it on interpreter, e.g. java/nodejs) and iptables-redirect. Use systemd-socket method to exclude this problem. Use authbind method to only allow special user binding. doesn't require setting CAP/suid every time you deploy new version of application. doesn't require application support/modification, like systemd-socket method. doesn't require kernel rebuild (if running version supports this sysctl setting) doesn't do LD_PRELOAD like authbind/privbind method, this could potentially affect performance, security, behavior (does it? haven't tested). In the rest authbind is really flexible and secure method. over-performs iptables REDIRECT/DNAT method, since it doesn't require address translation, connection state tracking, etc. This only noticeable on high-load systems.

根据具体情况，我将在sysctl、CAP、authbind和iptables-redirect之间进行选择。我们有这么多选择真是太好了。

文件功能并不理想，因为它们可能在包更新后失效。

恕我直言，理想的解决方案应该是能够创建具有可继承CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE集的shell。

这里有一个有点复杂的方法:

sg $DAEMONUSER "capsh --keep=1 --uid=`id -u $DAEMONUSER` \
     --caps='cap_net_bind_service+pei' -- \
     YOUR_COMMAND_GOES_HERE"

capsh实用程序可以在Debian/Ubuntu发行版的libcap2-bin包中找到。事情是这样的:

sg将生效的组ID修改为守护用户的组ID。这是必要的，因为capsh会使GID保持不变，而我们肯定不想要它。 设置位“保持UID更改的能力”。 修改UID为$DAEMONUSER 删除所有的大写(此时所有的大写仍然存在，因为——keep=1)，除了可继承的cap_net_bind_service 执行命令(“——”是分隔符)

结果是一个具有指定用户和组以及cap_net_bind_service特权的进程。

例如，ejabberd启动脚本中的一行:

sg $EJABBERDUSER "capsh --keep=1 --uid=`id -u $EJABBERDUSER` --caps='cap_net_bind_service+pei' -- $EJABBERD --noshell -detached"

在libcap网站上有一个文件共享库链接到非特权应用程序的实例。最近在回答一个关于向共享库添加功能的问题时提到了它。