我想比较两个数组。。。理想地、有效地。没有什么稀奇古怪的，如果它们是相同的，那就是真的，如果不是，那就是假的。毫不奇怪，比较运算符似乎不起作用。
var a1 = [1,2,3];
var a2 = [1,2,3];
console.log(a1==a2); // Returns false
console.log(JSON.stringify(a1)==JSON.stringify(a2)); // Returns true
JSON对每个数组进行编码，但是否有一种更快或“更好”的方法来简单地比较数组而不必遍历每个值？
当前回答
此外，我还根据需要将Thomas的解决方案转换为无需排序的比较。
Array.prototype.equalsFreeOrder = function (array) {
var isThisElemExist;
if (!array)
return false;
if (this.length != array.length)
return false;
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
isThisElemExist = false;
for (var k = 0; k < this.length; k++) {
if (this[i] instanceof Array && array[k] instanceof Array) {
if (this[i].equalsFreeOrder(array[k]))
isThisElemExist = true;
}
else if (this[i] == array[k]) {
isThisElemExist = true;
}
}
if (!isThisElemExist)
return false;
}
return true;
}
其他回答
尝试了深度平等，并且成功了
var eq = require('deep-equal');
eq({a: 1, b: 2, c: [3, 4]}, {c: [3, 4], a: 1, b: 2});
如果数组是普通的，并且顺序很重要，那么这两行可能会有所帮助
//Assume
var a = ['a','b', 'c']; var b = ['a','e', 'c'];
if(a.length !== b.length) return false;
return !a.reduce(
function(prev,next,idx, arr){ return prev || next != b[idx] },false
);
Reduce遍历数组之一，如果“a”的至少一个元素与“b”的元素不相等，则返回“false”只需将其包装到函数中
如果它们是两个数字或字符串数组，这是一个快速的单行数组
const array1 = [1, 2, 3];
const array2 = [1, 3, 4];
console.log(array1.join(',') === array2.join(',')) //false
const array3 = [1, 2, 3];
const array4 = [1, 2, 3];
console.log(array3.join(',') === array4.join(',')) //true
这是一个字体版本：
//https://stackoverflow.com/a/16436975/2589276
export function arraysEqual<T>(a: Array<T>, b: Array<T>): boolean {
if (a === b) return true
if (a == null || b == null) return false
if (a.length != b.length) return false
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; ++i) {
if (a[i] !== b[i]) return false
}
return true
}
//https://stackoverflow.com/a/16436975/2589276
export function arraysDeepEqual<T>(a: Array<T>, b: Array<T>): boolean {
return JSON.stringify(a) === JSON.stringify(b)
}
摩卡的一些测试用例：
it('arraysEqual', function () {
let a = [1,2]
let b = [1,2]
let c = [2,3]
let d = [2, 3]
let e = ['car','apple','banana']
let f = ['car','apple','banana']
let g = ['car','apple','banan8']
expect(arraysEqual(a, b)).to.equal(true)
expect(arraysEqual(c, d)).to.equal(true)
expect(arraysEqual(a, d)).to.equal(false)
expect(arraysEqual(e, f)).to.equal(true)
expect(arraysEqual(f, g)).to.equal(false)
})
it('arraysDeepEqual', function () {
let a = [1,2]
let b = [1,2]
let c = [2,3]
let d = [2, 3]
let e = ['car','apple','banana']
let f = ['car','apple','banana']
let g = ['car','apple','banan8']
let h = [[1,2],'apple','banan8']
let i = [[1,2],'apple','banan8']
let j = [[1,3],'apple','banan8']
expect(arraysDeepEqual(a, b)).to.equal(true)
expect(arraysDeepEqual(c, d)).to.equal(true)
expect(arraysDeepEqual(a, d)).to.equal(false)
expect(arraysDeepEqual(e, f)).to.equal(true)
expect(arraysDeepEqual(f, g)).to.equal(false)
expect(arraysDeepEqual(h, i)).to.equal(true)
expect(arraysDeepEqual(h, j)).to.equal(false)
})
要比较数组，请循环它们并比较每个值：
比较阵列：
// Warn if overriding existing method
if(Array.prototype.equals)
console.warn("Overriding existing Array.prototype.equals. Possible causes: New API defines the method, there's a framework conflict or you've got double inclusions in your code.");
// attach the .equals method to Array's prototype to call it on any array
Array.prototype.equals = function (array) {
// if the other array is a falsy value, return
if (!array)
return false;
// if the argument is the same array, we can be sure the contents are same as well
if(array === this)
return true;
// compare lengths - can save a lot of time
if (this.length != array.length)
return false;
for (var i = 0, l=this.length; i < l; i++) {
// Check if we have nested arrays
if (this[i] instanceof Array && array[i] instanceof Array) {
// recurse into the nested arrays
if (!this[i].equals(array[i]))
return false;
}
else if (this[i] != array[i]) {
// Warning - two different object instances will never be equal: {x:20} != {x:20}
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
// Hide method from for-in loops
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "equals", {enumerable: false});
用法：
[1, 2, [3, 4]].equals([1, 2, [3, 2]]) === false;
[1, "2,3"].equals([1, 2, 3]) === false;
[1, 2, [3, 4]].equals([1, 2, [3, 4]]) === true;
[1, 2, 1, 2].equals([1, 2, 1, 2]) === true;
你可能会说“但是比较字符串要快得多——没有循环……”那么你应该注意到有ARE循环。第一个递归循环将数组转换为字符串，第二个递归循环比较两个字符串。因此，此方法比使用字符串更快。
我认为，更大量的数据应该始终存储在数组中，而不是存储在对象中。但是，如果使用对象，也可以对它们进行部分比较。以下是操作方法：
比较对象：
我在上面说过，两个对象实例永远不会相等，即使它们当前包含相同的数据：
({a:1, foo:"bar", numberOfTheBeast: 666}) == ({a:1, foo:"bar", numberOfTheBeast: 666}) //false
这是有原因的，因为例如对象中可能存在私有变量。
但是，如果您只使用对象结构来包含数据，则仍然可以进行比较：
Object.prototype.equals = function(object2) {
//For the first loop, we only check for types
for (propName in this) {
//Check for inherited methods and properties - like .equals itself
//https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/hasOwnProperty
//Return false if the return value is different
if (this.hasOwnProperty(propName) != object2.hasOwnProperty(propName)) {
return false;
}
//Check instance type
else if (typeof this[propName] != typeof object2[propName]) {
//Different types => not equal
return false;
}
}
//Now a deeper check using other objects property names
for(propName in object2) {
//We must check instances anyway, there may be a property that only exists in object2
//I wonder, if remembering the checked values from the first loop would be faster or not
if (this.hasOwnProperty(propName) != object2.hasOwnProperty(propName)) {
return false;
}
else if (typeof this[propName] != typeof object2[propName]) {
return false;
}
//If the property is inherited, do not check any more (it must be equa if both objects inherit it)
if(!this.hasOwnProperty(propName))
continue;
//Now the detail check and recursion
//This returns the script back to the array comparing
/**REQUIRES Array.equals**/
if (this[propName] instanceof Array && object2[propName] instanceof Array) {
// recurse into the nested arrays
if (!this[propName].equals(object2[propName]))
return false;
}
else if (this[propName] instanceof Object && object2[propName] instanceof Object) {
// recurse into another objects
//console.log("Recursing to compare ", this[propName],"with",object2[propName], " both named \""+propName+"\"");
if (!this[propName].equals(object2[propName]))
return false;
}
//Normal value comparison for strings and numbers
else if(this[propName] != object2[propName]) {
return false;
}
}
//If everything passed, let's say YES
return true;
}
然而，请记住，这一个用于比较类似JSON的数据，而不是类实例和其他东西。如果你想比较更复杂的对象，看看这个答案，它是一个超长函数。要使用Array.equals实现此功能，必须稍微编辑原始函数：
...
// Check if we have nested arrays
if (this[i] instanceof Array && array[i] instanceof Array) {
// recurse into the nested arrays
if (!this[i].equals(array[i]))
return false;
}
/**REQUIRES OBJECT COMPARE**/
else if (this[i] instanceof Object && array[i] instanceof Object) {
// recurse into another objects
//console.log("Recursing to compare ", this[propName],"with",object2[propName], " both named \""+propName+"\"");
if (!this[i].equals(array[i]))
return false;
}
else if (this[i] != array[i]) {
...
我为这两个功能制作了一个小测试工具。
附加：带有indexOf和包含的嵌套数组
Samy Bencherif为您在嵌套数组中搜索特定对象的情况准备了有用的函数，这些函数在这里提供：https://jsfiddle.net/SamyBencherif/8352y6yw/
