我想比较两个数组。。。理想地、有效地。没有什么稀奇古怪的,如果它们是相同的,那就是真的,如果不是,那就是假的。毫不奇怪,比较运算符似乎不起作用。

var a1 = [1,2,3];
var a2 = [1,2,3];
console.log(a1==a2);    // Returns false
console.log(JSON.stringify(a1)==JSON.stringify(a2));    // Returns true

JSON对每个数组进行编码,但是否有一种更快或“更好”的方法来简单地比较数组而不必遍历每个值?


当前回答

要比较数组,请循环它们并比较每个值:

比较阵列:

// Warn if overriding existing method
if(Array.prototype.equals)
    console.warn("Overriding existing Array.prototype.equals. Possible causes: New API defines the method, there's a framework conflict or you've got double inclusions in your code.");
// attach the .equals method to Array's prototype to call it on any array
Array.prototype.equals = function (array) {
    // if the other array is a falsy value, return
    if (!array)
        return false;
    // if the argument is the same array, we can be sure the contents are same as well
    if(array === this)
        return true;
    // compare lengths - can save a lot of time 
    if (this.length != array.length)
        return false;

    for (var i = 0, l=this.length; i < l; i++) {
        // Check if we have nested arrays
        if (this[i] instanceof Array && array[i] instanceof Array) {
            // recurse into the nested arrays
            if (!this[i].equals(array[i]))
                return false;       
        }           
        else if (this[i] != array[i]) { 
            // Warning - two different object instances will never be equal: {x:20} != {x:20}
            return false;   
        }           
    }       
    return true;
}
// Hide method from for-in loops
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "equals", {enumerable: false});

用法:

[1, 2, [3, 4]].equals([1, 2, [3, 2]]) === false;
[1, "2,3"].equals([1, 2, 3]) === false;
[1, 2, [3, 4]].equals([1, 2, [3, 4]]) === true;
[1, 2, 1, 2].equals([1, 2, 1, 2]) === true;

你可能会说“但是比较字符串要快得多——没有循环……”那么你应该注意到有ARE循环。第一个递归循环将数组转换为字符串,第二个递归循环比较两个字符串。因此,此方法比使用字符串更快。

我认为,更大量的数据应该始终存储在数组中,而不是存储在对象中。但是,如果使用对象,也可以对它们进行部分比较。以下是操作方法:

比较对象:

我在上面说过,两个对象实例永远不会相等,即使它们当前包含相同的数据:

({a:1, foo:"bar", numberOfTheBeast: 666}) == ({a:1, foo:"bar", numberOfTheBeast: 666})  //false

这是有原因的,因为例如对象中可能存在私有变量。

但是,如果您只使用对象结构来包含数据,则仍然可以进行比较:

Object.prototype.equals = function(object2) {
    //For the first loop, we only check for types
    for (propName in this) {
        //Check for inherited methods and properties - like .equals itself
        //https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/hasOwnProperty
        //Return false if the return value is different
        if (this.hasOwnProperty(propName) != object2.hasOwnProperty(propName)) {
            return false;
        }
        //Check instance type
        else if (typeof this[propName] != typeof object2[propName]) {
            //Different types => not equal
            return false;
        }
    }
    //Now a deeper check using other objects property names
    for(propName in object2) {
        //We must check instances anyway, there may be a property that only exists in object2
            //I wonder, if remembering the checked values from the first loop would be faster or not 
        if (this.hasOwnProperty(propName) != object2.hasOwnProperty(propName)) {
            return false;
        }
        else if (typeof this[propName] != typeof object2[propName]) {
            return false;
        }
        //If the property is inherited, do not check any more (it must be equa if both objects inherit it)
        if(!this.hasOwnProperty(propName))
          continue;
        
        //Now the detail check and recursion
        
        //This returns the script back to the array comparing
        /**REQUIRES Array.equals**/
        if (this[propName] instanceof Array && object2[propName] instanceof Array) {
                   // recurse into the nested arrays
           if (!this[propName].equals(object2[propName]))
                        return false;
        }
        else if (this[propName] instanceof Object && object2[propName] instanceof Object) {
                   // recurse into another objects
                   //console.log("Recursing to compare ", this[propName],"with",object2[propName], " both named \""+propName+"\"");
           if (!this[propName].equals(object2[propName]))
                        return false;
        }
        //Normal value comparison for strings and numbers
        else if(this[propName] != object2[propName]) {
           return false;
        }
    }
    //If everything passed, let's say YES
    return true;
}  

然而,请记住,这一个用于比较类似JSON的数据,而不是类实例和其他东西。如果你想比较更复杂的对象,看看这个答案,它是一个超长函数。要使用Array.equals实现此功能,必须稍微编辑原始函数:

...
    // Check if we have nested arrays
    if (this[i] instanceof Array && array[i] instanceof Array) {
        // recurse into the nested arrays
        if (!this[i].equals(array[i]))
            return false;
    }
    /**REQUIRES OBJECT COMPARE**/
    else if (this[i] instanceof Object && array[i] instanceof Object) {
        // recurse into another objects
        //console.log("Recursing to compare ", this[propName],"with",object2[propName], " both named \""+propName+"\"");
        if (!this[i].equals(array[i]))
            return false;
        }
    else if (this[i] != array[i]) {
...

我为这两个功能制作了一个小测试工具。

附加:带有indexOf和包含的嵌套数组

Samy Bencherif为您在嵌套数组中搜索特定对象的情况准备了有用的函数,这些函数在这里提供:https://jsfiddle.net/SamyBencherif/8352y6yw/

其他回答

在我的例子中,比较数组只包含数字和字符串。此函数将显示数组是否包含相同的元素。

function are_arrs_match(arr1, arr2){
    return arr1.sort().toString() === arr2.sort().toString()
}

让我们测试一下!

arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 'nik']
arr2 = ['nik', 3, 1, 2]
arr3 = [1, 2, 5]

console.log (are_arrs_match(arr1, arr2)) //true
console.log (are_arrs_match(arr1, arr3)) //false

本着原问题的精神:

我想比较两个数组。。。理想地、有效地。没有什么想象,如果它们是相同的,则为真,如果不是,则为假。

我一直在对这里提出的一些更简单的建议进行性能测试,结果如下(从快到慢):

而Tim Down(67%)

var i = a1.length;
while (i--) {
    if (a1[i] !== a2[i]) return false;
}
return true

每(69%)用户2782196

a1.every((v,i)=> v === a2[i]);

DEI减少(74%)

a1.reduce((a, b) => a && a2.includes(b), true);

Gaizka Allende&vivek的join&toString(78%)

a1.join('') === a2.join('');

a1.toString() === a2.toString();

Victor Palomo创作的半到字符串(90%)

a1 == a2.toString();

radtek的stringify(100%)

JSON.stringify(a1) === JSON.stringify(a2);

注意,下面的示例假设数组是排序的,一维数组。对于一个常见的基准测试,长度比较已被删除(将a1.length==a2.length添加到任何建议中,您将获得约10%的性能提升)。选择最适合您的解决方案,了解每种解决方案的速度和局限性。

与嵌套数组一起使用MULTIPLE参数:

//:Return true if all of the arrays equal.
//:Works with nested arrays.
function AllArrEQ(...arrays){
    for(var i = 0; i < (arrays.length-1); i++ ){
        var a1 = arrays[i+0];
        var a2 = arrays[i+1];
        var res =( 
            //:Are both elements arrays?
            Array.isArray(a1)&&Array.isArray(a2) 
            ?
            //:Yes: Compare Each Sub-Array:
            //:v==a1[i]
            a1.every((v,i)=>(AllArrEQ(v,a2[i])))
            :
            //:No: Simple Comparison:
            (a1===a2)
        );;
        if(!res){return false;}
    };;
    return( true );
};;

console.log( AllArrEQ( 
        [1,2,3,[4,5,[6,"ALL_EQUAL"   ]]],
        [1,2,3,[4,5,[6,"ALL_EQUAL"   ]]],
        [1,2,3,[4,5,[6,"ALL_EQUAL"   ]]],
        [1,2,3,[4,5,[6,"ALL_EQUAL"   ]]],
));; 

尝试了深度平等,并且成功了

var eq = require('deep-equal');
eq({a: 1, b: 2, c: [3, 4]}, {c: [3, 4], a: 1, b: 2});

我相信简单的JS和ECMAScript 2015,这很好理解。

var is_arrays_compare_similar = function (array1, array2) {

    let flag = true;

    if (array1.length == array2.length) {

        // check first array1 object is available in array2 index
        array1.every( array_obj => {
            if (flag) {
                if (!array2.includes(array_obj)) {
                    flag = false;
                }
            }
        });
        
        // then vice versa check array2 object is available in array1 index
        array2.every( array_obj => {
            if (flag) {
                if (!array1.includes(array_obj)) {
                    flag = false;
                }
            }
        });

        return flag;
    } else {
        return false;
    }
    
}