有几种方法可以达到相同的效果:

import sys
import inspect

def what_is_my_name():
    print(inspect.stack()[0][0].f_code.co_name)
    print(inspect.stack()[0][3])
    print(inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name)
    print(sys._getframe().f_code.co_name)

注意inspect。堆栈调用比替代方法慢数千倍:

$ python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'inspect.stack()[0][0].f_code.co_name'
1000 loops, best of 3: 499 usec per loop
$ python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'inspect.stack()[0][3]'
1000 loops, best of 3: 497 usec per loop
$ python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name'
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.1 usec per loop
$ python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'sys._getframe().f_code.co_name'
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.135 usec per loop

2021年8月更新(原文章为Python2.7编写)

Python 3.9.1 (default, Dec 11 2020, 14:32:07)
[GCC 7.3.0] :: Anaconda, Inc. on linux

python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'inspect.stack()[0][0].f_code.co_name'
500 loops, best of 5: 390 usec per loop
python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'inspect.stack()[0][3]'
500 loops, best of 5: 398 usec per loop
python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name'
2000000 loops, best of 5: 176 nsec per loop
python -m timeit -s 'import inspect, sys' 'sys._getframe().f_code.co_name'
5000000 loops, best of 5: 62.8 nsec per loop

.f_back.f_code Sincesys._getframe()。Co_name在python 3.9中根本不起作用，下面可以从现在开始使用:

from inspect import currentframe


def testNameFunction() -> str:
    return currentframe().f_back.f_code.co_name


print(f'function name is {testNameFunction()}(...)')

结果:

function name is testNameFunction(...)

我用自己的方法在多重继承场景中安全地调用super(我把所有代码都放在这里)

def safe_super(_class, _inst):
    """safe super call"""
    try:
        return getattr(super(_class, _inst), _inst.__fname__)
    except:
        return (lambda *x,**kx: None)


def with_name(function):
    def wrap(self, *args, **kwargs):
        self.__fname__ = function.__name__
        return function(self, *args, **kwargs)
return wrap

示例用法:

class A(object):

    def __init__():
        super(A, self).__init__()

    @with_name
    def test(self):
        print 'called from A\n'
        safe_super(A, self)()

class B(object):

    def __init__():
        super(B, self).__init__()

    @with_name
    def test(self):
        print 'called from B\n'
        safe_super(B, self)()

class C(A, B):

    def __init__():
        super(C, self).__init__()

    @with_name
    def test(self):
        print 'called from C\n'
        safe_super(C, self)()

测试:

a = C()
a.test()

输出:

called from C
called from A
called from B

在每个@with_name修饰的方法中，您可以访问self。__fname__作为当前函数名。

import sys

def func_name():
    """
    :return: name of caller
    """
    return sys._getframe(1).f_code.co_name

class A(object):
    def __init__(self):
        pass
    def test_class_func_name(self):
        print(func_name())

def test_func_name():
    print(func_name())

测试:

a = A()
a.test_class_func_name()
test_func_name()

输出:

test_class_func_name
test_func_name

import inspect

def foo():
   print(inspect.stack()[0][3])
   print(inspect.stack()[1][3])  # will give the caller of foos name, if something called foo

foo()

输出:

喷火 < module_caller_of_foo >

Python没有在函数本身中访问函数或其名称的特性。它已经被提出，但被否决了。如果你不想自己玩堆栈，你应该使用“bar”或bar。__name__取决于上下文。

给定的拒绝通知为:

此PEP被拒绝。它不清楚应该如何实现，也不清楚在边缘情况下应该有什么精确的语义，而且没有给出足够重要的用例。人们的反应充其量也只是不温不火。