这个怎么样?

switch (this.name) 
{
  case "A":
    doA();
    break;
  case "B":
    doB();
    break;
  case "C":
    doC();
    break;
  default:
    console.log('Undefined instance');
}

我个人比较喜欢下面的Java 1.8代码:

    mySwitch("YY")
            .myCase("AA", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"aa");
            })
            .myCase("BB", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"bb");
            })
            .myCase("YY", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"yy");
            })
            .myCase("ZZ", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"zz");
            });

将输出:

YYyy

示例代码使用字符串，但您可以使用任何对象类型，包括Class。例如:. mycase (this.getClass()， (o) ->…

需要以下片段:

public Case mySwitch(Object reference) {
    return new Case(reference);
}

public class Case {

    private Object reference;

    public Case(Object reference) {
        this.reference = reference;
    }

    public Case myCase(Object b, OnMatchDo task) {
        if (reference.equals(b)) {
            task.task(reference);
        }
        return this;
    }
}

public interface OnMatchDo {
    public void task(Object o);
}

While it is not possible to write a switch statement, it is possible to branch out to specific processing for each given type. One way of doing this is to use standard double dispatch mechanism. An example where we want to "switch" based on type is Jersey Exception mapper where we need to map multitude of exceptions to error responses. While for this specific case there is probably a better way (i.e. using a polymorphic method that translates each exception to an error response), using double dispatch mechanism is still useful and practical.

interface Processable {
    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor);
}

interface Processor<R> {
    R process(final A a);
    R process(final B b);
    R process(final C c);
    // for each type of Processable
    ...
}

class A implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class B implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class C implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

然后在任何需要“开关”的地方，你可以这样做:

public class LogProcessor implements Processor<String> {
    private static final Logger log = Logger.for(LogProcessor.class);

    public void logIt(final Processable base) {
        log.info("Logging for type {}", process(base));
    }

    // Processor methods, these are basically the effective "case" statements
    String process(final A a) {
        return "Stringifying A";
    }

    String process(final B b) {
        return "Stringifying B";
    }

    String process(final C c) {
        return "Stringifying C";
    }
}

如果需要通过“this”对象的类类型“切换”，这个答案是最好的https://stackoverflow.com/a/5579385/2078368

但如果你需要将“switch”应用于任何其他变量。我建议另一种解决办法。定义以下接口:

public interface ClassTypeInterface {
    public String getType();
}

在你想要“切换”的每个类中实现这个接口。例子:

public class A extends Something implements ClassTypeInterface {

    public final static String TYPE = "A";

    @Override
    public String getType() {
        return TYPE;
    }
}

之后，你可以用以下方式使用它:

switch (var.getType()) {
    case A.TYPE: {
        break;
    }
    case B.TYPE: {
        break;
    }
    ...
}

你唯一需要关心的是——在实现ClassTypeInterface的所有类中保持“类型”的唯一性。这不是一个大问题，因为在任何交集的情况下，您都会收到“switch-case”语句的编译时错误。

如果你绝对不能编码到接口，那么你可以使用枚举作为中介:

public A() {

    CLAZZ z = CLAZZ.valueOf(this.getClass().getSimpleName());
    switch (z) {
    case A:
        doA();
        break;
    case B:
        doB();
        break;
    case C:
        doC();
        break;
    }
}


enum CLAZZ {
    A,B,C;

}

这是子类型多态有助于实现的典型场景。执行以下步骤

interface I {
  void do();
}

class A implements I { void do() { doA() } ... }
class B implements I { void do() { doB() } ... }
class C implements I { void do() { doC() } ... }

然后您可以简单地在此上调用do()。

如果您不能自由地更改A、B和C，则可以应用访问者模式来实现相同的目的。