我正在构建一个类库,它将有一些公共和私有方法。我希望能够对私有方法进行单元测试(主要是在开发过程中,但也可以用于将来的重构)。
正确的做法是什么?
我正在构建一个类库,它将有一些公共和私有方法。我希望能够对私有方法进行单元测试(主要是在开发过程中,但也可以用于将来的重构)。
正确的做法是什么?
当前回答
我使用PrivateObject类。但如前所述,最好避免测试私有方法。
Class target = new Class();
PrivateObject obj = new PrivateObject(target);
var retVal = obj.Invoke("PrivateMethod");
Assert.AreEqual(retVal);
其他回答
我倾向于不使用编译器指令,因为它们很快就会把事情弄得乱七八糟。如果你真的需要它们,一种缓解它的方法是把它们放在一个partial类中,并让你的构建在制作产品版本时忽略那个.cs文件。
还请注意,internalsvisibletoattribute有一个要求,您的程序集必须是强命名的,如果您在一个以前没有这个要求的解决方案中工作,这就会产生它自己的一组问题。我使用访问器来测试私有方法。请看这个问题的例子。
I don't agree with the "you should only be interested in testing the external interface" philosophy. It's a bit like saying that a car repair shop should only have tests to see if the wheels turn. Yes, ultimately I'm interested in the external behavior but I like my own, private, internal tests to be a bit more specific and to the point. Yes, if I refactor, I may have to change some of the tests, but unless it's a massive refactor, I'll only have to change a few and the fact that the other (unchanged) internal tests still work is a great indicator that the refactoring has been successful.
You can try to cover all internal cases using only the public interface and theoretically it's possible to test every internal method (or at least every one that matters) entirely by using the public interface but you may have to end up standing on your head to achieve this and the connection between the test cases being run through the public interface and the internal portion of the solution they're designed to test may be difficult or impossible to discern. Having pointed, individual tests that guarantee that the internal machinery is working properly is well worth the minor test changes that come about with refactoring - at least that's been my experience. If you have to make huge changes to your tests for every refactoring, then maybe this doesn't make sense, but in that case, maybe you ought to rethink your design entirely. A good design should be flexible enough to allow for most changes without massive redesigns.
CC -Dprivate=public
“CC”是我使用的系统上的命令行编译器。-Dfoo=bar相当于#define foo bar。因此,这个编译选项有效地将所有私有内容更改为公共。
由于某些原因,私有类型、内部变量和私有成员是这样的,通常你不想直接打乱它们。如果您这样做了,很可能稍后会崩溃,因为不能保证创建这些程序集的人会保留私有/内部实现。
但是,有时,在对编译或第三方程序集进行一些hack /探索时,我自己最终想要初始化一个私有类或具有私有或内部构造函数的类。或者,有时,在处理无法更改的预编译遗留库时——我最终会针对私有方法编写一些测试。
因此诞生了AccessPrivateWrapper - http://amazedsaint.blogspot.com/2010/05/accessprivatewrapper-c-40-dynamic.html -它是一个快速的包装类,使用c# 4.0的动态特性和反射可以使工作变得容易。
您可以创建内部/私有类型,例如
//Note that the wrapper is dynamic
dynamic wrapper = AccessPrivateWrapper.FromType
(typeof(SomeKnownClass).Assembly,"ClassWithPrivateConstructor");
//Access the private members
wrapper.PrivateMethodInPrivateClass();