合并——只有当你合并其他分支代码并且它有冲突时才会中止。

git merge --abort

如果stash pop有冲突，你可以使用:

git reset --merge

好吧，我想我已经解决了"git stash unapply"。它比git apply -reverse更复杂，因为你需要反向合并操作，以防git stash apply做了任何合并。

反向合并要求所有当前更改都被推入索引:

Git add -u

然后反转由git stash apply完成的合并递归:

——$(Git write-tree) stash@{0}^1

现在你将只剩下非隐藏的变化。它们会在索引中。如果你愿意，你可以使用git重置来取消你的更改。

鉴于你最初的git stash应用失败了，我假设反向也可能失败，因为它想要撤消的一些事情没有完成。

下面是一个例子，展示了工作副本(通过git状态)如何再次干净:

 $ git status
# On branch trunk
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
 $ git stash apply
Auto-merging foo.c
# On branch trunk
# Changed but not updated:
#   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
#   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
#
#       modified:   foo.c
#
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
 $ git add -u
 $ git merge-recursive stash@{0}: -- $(git write-tree) stash@{0}^1
Auto-merging foo.c
 $ git status
# On branch trunk
nothing to commit (working directory clean)

我的用例:只是尝试弹出到错误的分支并得到冲突。我所需要的是撤消弹出，但保持它在收藏列表，以便我可以弹出它在正确的分支。我是这样做的:

git reset HEAD --hard
git checkout my_correct_branch
git stash pop

一件容易的事。

我可以在“脏”目录上重新生成干净的git stash pop，具有未提交的更改，但尚未生成合并冲突的pop。

如果在合并冲突中，你试图应用的stash没有消失，你可以尝试检查git show stash@{0}(可选与-ours或-their)，并与git statis和git diff HEAD进行比较。您应该能够看到哪些更改来自应用存储。

I'm posting here hoping that others my find my answer helpful. I had a similar problem when I tried to do a stash pop on a different branch than the one I had stashed from. On my case I had no files that were uncommitted or in the index but still got into the merge conflicts case (same case as @pid). As others pointed out previously, the failed git stash pop did indeed retain my stash, then A quick git reset HEAD plus going back to my original branch and doing the stash from there did resolve my problem.

如果你不需要担心你所做的任何其他更改，你只想回到上次提交，那么你可以这样做:

git reset .
git checkout .
git clean -f