我已经创建了清除状态的操作。因此，当我分派登出动作创建者时，我也分派动作来清除状态。

用户记录动作

export const clearUserRecord = () => ({
  type: CLEAR_USER_RECORD
});

注销操作创建器

export const logoutUser = () => {
  return dispatch => {
    dispatch(requestLogout())
    dispatch(receiveLogout())
    localStorage.removeItem('auth_token')
    dispatch({ type: 'CLEAR_USER_RECORD' })
  }
};

减速机

const userRecords = (state = {isFetching: false,
  userRecord: [], message: ''}, action) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case REQUEST_USER_RECORD:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: true}
    case RECEIVE_USER_RECORD:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: false,
      userRecord: action.user_record}
    case USER_RECORD_ERROR:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: false,
      message: action.message}
    case CLEAR_USER_RECORD:
    return {...state,
      isFetching: false,
      message: '',
      userRecord: []}
    default:
      return state
  }
};

我不确定这是否是最佳的?

我在使用typescript时的解决方案，建立在Dan Abramov的答案之上(redux类型使得不可能将undefined作为第一个参数传递给reducer，所以我将初始根状态缓存在一个常量中):

// store

export const store: Store<IStoreState> = createStore(
  rootReducer,
  storeEnhacer,
)

export const initialRootState = {
  ...store.getState(),
}

// root reducer

const appReducer = combineReducers<IStoreState>(reducers)

export const rootReducer = (state: IStoreState, action: IAction<any>) => {
  if (action.type === "USER_LOGOUT") {
    return appReducer(initialRootState, action)
  }

  return appReducer(state, action)
}


// auth service

class Auth {
  ...

  logout() {
    store.dispatch({type: "USER_LOGOUT"})
  }
}

我已经创建了清除状态的操作。因此，当我分派登出动作创建者时，我也分派动作来清除状态。

用户记录动作

export const clearUserRecord = () => ({
  type: CLEAR_USER_RECORD
});

注销操作创建器

export const logoutUser = () => {
  return dispatch => {
    dispatch(requestLogout())
    dispatch(receiveLogout())
    localStorage.removeItem('auth_token')
    dispatch({ type: 'CLEAR_USER_RECORD' })
  }
};

减速机

const userRecords = (state = {isFetching: false,
  userRecord: [], message: ''}, action) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case REQUEST_USER_RECORD:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: true}
    case RECEIVE_USER_RECORD:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: false,
      userRecord: action.user_record}
    case USER_RECORD_ERROR:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: false,
      message: action.message}
    case CLEAR_USER_RECORD:
    return {...state,
      isFetching: false,
      message: '',
      userRecord: []}
    default:
      return state
  }
};

我不确定这是否是最佳的?

使用Redux Toolkit的方法:

export const createRootReducer = (history: History) => {
  const rootReducerFn = combineReducers({
    auth: authReducer,
    users: usersReducer,
    ...allOtherReducers,
    router: connectRouter(history),
  });

  return (state: Parameters<typeof rootReducerFn>[0], action: Parameters<typeof rootReducerFn>[1]) =>
    rootReducerFn(action.type === appActions.reset.type ? undefined : state, action);
};

Dan Abramov的答案是正确的，除了我们在使用react-router-redux包时遇到了一个奇怪的问题。

我们的解决方案是不将状态设置为undefined，而是仍然使用当前的路由减速器。因此，如果您正在使用这个包，我建议实现下面的解决方案

const rootReducer = (state, action) => {
  if (action.type === 'USER_LOGOUT') {
    const { routing } = state
    state = { routing } 
  }
  return appReducer(state, action)
}

除了Dan Abramov的回答之外，我们是否应该明确地将action设置为action = {type: '@@INIT'}以及state = undefined。采用上述动作方式，各减速器均返回初始状态。