我已经创建了清除状态的操作。因此，当我分派登出动作创建者时，我也分派动作来清除状态。

用户记录动作

export const clearUserRecord = () => ({
  type: CLEAR_USER_RECORD
});

注销操作创建器

export const logoutUser = () => {
  return dispatch => {
    dispatch(requestLogout())
    dispatch(receiveLogout())
    localStorage.removeItem('auth_token')
    dispatch({ type: 'CLEAR_USER_RECORD' })
  }
};

减速机

const userRecords = (state = {isFetching: false,
  userRecord: [], message: ''}, action) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case REQUEST_USER_RECORD:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: true}
    case RECEIVE_USER_RECORD:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: false,
      userRecord: action.user_record}
    case USER_RECORD_ERROR:
    return { ...state,
      isFetching: false,
      message: action.message}
    case CLEAR_USER_RECORD:
    return {...state,
      isFetching: false,
      message: '',
      userRecord: []}
    default:
      return state
  }
};

我不确定这是否是最佳的?

NGRX4更新

如果您正在迁移到NGRX 4，您可能已经从迁移指南中注意到用于组合reducer的rootreducer方法已经被ActionReducerMap方法所取代。起初，这种新的做事方式可能会使重置状态成为一个挑战。它实际上很简单，但这样做的方式已经改变了。

这个解决方案的灵感来自NGRX4 Github文档的元还原器API部分。

首先，让我们假设你正在使用NGRX的新ActionReducerMap选项像这样组合你的reducer:

//index.reducer.ts
export const reducers: ActionReducerMap<State> = {
    auth: fromAuth.reducer,
    layout: fromLayout.reducer,
    users: fromUsers.reducer,
    networks: fromNetworks.reducer,
    routingDisplay: fromRoutingDisplay.reducer,
    routing: fromRouting.reducer,
    routes: fromRoutes.reducer,
    routesFilter: fromRoutesFilter.reducer,
    params: fromParams.reducer
}

现在，假设你想从app。module内部重置状态

//app.module.ts
import { IndexReducer } from './index.reducer';
import { StoreModule, ActionReducer, MetaReducer } from '@ngrx/store';
...
export function debug(reducer: ActionReducer<any>): ActionReducer<any> {
    return function(state, action) {

      switch (action.type) {
          case fromAuth.LOGOUT:
            console.log("logout action");
            state = undefined;
      }
  
      return reducer(state, action);
    }
  }

  export const metaReducers: MetaReducer<any>[] = [debug];

  @NgModule({
    imports: [
        ...
        StoreModule.forRoot(reducers, { metaReducers}),
        ...
    ]
})

export class AppModule { }

这基本上是用NGRX 4达到同样效果的一种方法。

为了避免Redux引用初始状态的相同变量，我的建议是:

// write the default state as a function
const defaultOptionsState = () => ({
  option1: '',
  option2: 42,
});

const initialState = {
  options: defaultOptionsState() // invoke it in your initial state
};

export default (state = initialState, action) => {

  switch (action.type) {

    case RESET_OPTIONS:
    return {
      ...state,
      options: defaultOptionsState() // invoke the default function to reset this part of the state
    };

    default:
    return state;
  }
};

我在使用typescript时的解决方案，建立在Dan Abramov的答案之上(redux类型使得不可能将undefined作为第一个参数传递给reducer，所以我将初始根状态缓存在一个常量中):

// store

export const store: Store<IStoreState> = createStore(
  rootReducer,
  storeEnhacer,
)

export const initialRootState = {
  ...store.getState(),
}

// root reducer

const appReducer = combineReducers<IStoreState>(reducers)

export const rootReducer = (state: IStoreState, action: IAction<any>) => {
  if (action.type === "USER_LOGOUT") {
    return appReducer(initialRootState, action)
  }

  return appReducer(state, action)
}


// auth service

class Auth {
  ...

  logout() {
    store.dispatch({type: "USER_LOGOUT"})
  }
}

简单回答一下丹·阿布拉莫夫的问题:

const rootReducer = combineReducers({
    auth: authReducer,
    ...formReducers,
    routing
});


export default (state, action) =>
  rootReducer(action.type === 'USER_LOGOUT' ? undefined : state, action);

如果你正在使用还原动作，这里有一个快速的解决方案，使用HOF(高阶函数)为handleActions。

import { handleActions } from 'redux-actions';

export function handleActionsEx(reducer, initialState) {
  const enhancedReducer = {
    ...reducer,
    RESET: () => initialState
  };
  return handleActions(enhancedReducer, initialState);
}

然后使用handleActionsEx代替原来的handleActions来处理reducers。

Dan的回答给出了关于这个问题的一个很好的想法，但它对我来说并不是很有效，因为我使用的是还原坚持。 当使用redux-persist时，简单地传递未定义的状态不会触发持久化行为，所以我知道我必须手动从存储中删除项目(在我的情况下，React Native，因此AsyncStorage)。

await AsyncStorage.removeItem('persist:root');

or

await persistor.flush(); // or await persistor.purge();

对我也没用——他们只是对我大喊大叫。(例如，抱怨“意外的键_persist…”)

然后我突然思考，我想要的只是让每个减速机在遇到RESET动作类型时回到自己的初始状态。这样，持久化就被自然地处理了。显然没有上面的实用函数(handleActionsEx)，我的代码不会看起来很干(虽然它只是一个一行程序，即RESET: () => initialState)，但我不能容忍它，因为我喜欢元编程。