用javascript实现数组交叉的最简单、无库代码是什么?我想写
intersection([1,2,3], [2,3,4,5])
并获得
[2, 3]
用javascript实现数组交叉的最简单、无库代码是什么?我想写
intersection([1,2,3], [2,3,4,5])
并获得
[2, 3]
当前回答
破坏性似乎是最简单的,特别是如果我们可以假设输入是排序的:
/* destructively finds the intersection of
* two arrays in a simple fashion.
*
* PARAMS
* a - first array, must already be sorted
* b - second array, must already be sorted
*
* NOTES
* State of input arrays is undefined when
* the function returns. They should be
* (prolly) be dumped.
*
* Should have O(n) operations, where n is
* n = MIN(a.length, b.length)
*/
function intersection_destructive(a, b)
{
var result = [];
while( a.length > 0 && b.length > 0 )
{
if (a[0] < b[0] ){ a.shift(); }
else if (a[0] > b[0] ){ b.shift(); }
else /* they're equal */
{
result.push(a.shift());
b.shift();
}
}
return result;
}
非破坏性的要稍微复杂一点,因为我们要跟踪指标:
/* finds the intersection of
* two arrays in a simple fashion.
*
* PARAMS
* a - first array, must already be sorted
* b - second array, must already be sorted
*
* NOTES
*
* Should have O(n) operations, where n is
* n = MIN(a.length(), b.length())
*/
function intersect_safe(a, b)
{
var ai=0, bi=0;
var result = [];
while( ai < a.length && bi < b.length )
{
if (a[ai] < b[bi] ){ ai++; }
else if (a[ai] > b[bi] ){ bi++; }
else /* they're equal */
{
result.push(a[ai]);
ai++;
bi++;
}
}
return result;
}
其他回答
function intersectionOfArrays(arr1, arr2) {
return arr1.filter((element) => arr2.indexOf(element) !== -1).filter((element, pos, self) => self.indexOf(element) == pos);
}
希望这有助于所有版本。
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = [];
var large = arr1.length>=arr2.length?arr1:arr2;
var small = JSON.stringify(large) == JSON.stringify(arr1)?arr2:arr1;
for(var i=0;i<large.length;i++){
var copyExists = false;
for(var j =0;j<small.length;j++){
if(large[i]==small[j]){
copyExists= true;
break;
}
}
if(!copyExists)
{
newArr.push(large[i]);
}
}
for(var i=0;i<small.length;i++){
var copyExists = false;
for(var j =0;j<large.length;j++){
if(large[j]==small[i]){
copyExists= true;
break;
}
}
if(!copyExists)
{
newArr.push(small[i]);
}
}
return newArr;
}
简单性:
// Usage
const intersection = allLists
.reduce(intersect, allValues)
.reduce(removeDuplicates, []);
// Implementation
const intersect = (intersection, list) =>
intersection.filter(item =>
list.some(x => x === item));
const removeDuplicates = (uniques, item) =>
uniques.includes(item) ? uniques : uniques.concat(item);
// Example Data
const somePeople = [bob, doug, jill];
const otherPeople = [sarah, bob, jill];
const morePeople = [jack, jill];
const allPeople = [...somePeople, ...otherPeople, ...morePeople];
const allGroups = [somePeople, otherPeople, morePeople];
// Example Usage
const intersection = allGroups
.reduce(intersect, allPeople)
.reduce(removeDuplicates, []);
intersection; // [jill]
好处:
泥土简单 以数据为中心的 适用于任意数量的列表 适用于任意长度的列表 适用于任意类型的值 适用于任意排序顺序 保留形状(在任何数组中首次出现的顺序) 尽可能早退出 内存安全,不影响函数/数组原型
缺点:
内存占用率较高 更高的CPU使用率 需要理解reduce 需要理解数据流
你不希望将其用于3D引擎或内核工作,但如果你在基于事件的应用程序中运行时遇到问题,那么你的设计就有更大的问题。
通过使用.pop而不是.shift可以提高@atk实现对原语排序数组的性能。
function intersect(array1, array2) {
var result = [];
// Don't destroy the original arrays
var a = array1.slice(0);
var b = array2.slice(0);
var aLast = a.length - 1;
var bLast = b.length - 1;
while (aLast >= 0 && bLast >= 0) {
if (a[aLast] > b[bLast] ) {
a.pop();
aLast--;
} else if (a[aLast] < b[bLast] ){
b.pop();
bLast--;
} else /* they're equal */ {
result.push(a.pop());
b.pop();
aLast--;
bLast--;
}
}
return result;
}
我使用jsPerf创建了一个基准测试。使用。pop要快三倍。
Var数组= [ [1,2,3], [2,3,4,5] ] 函数commonValue(…arr) { 令res = arr[0]。过滤(函数(x) { 返回arr.every((y) => y.includes(x)) }) 返回res; } commonValue数组(…);