如果你想将一个动态大小的2-d数组传递给一个函数，使用一些指针可能对你有用。

void func1(int *arr, int n, int m){
    ...
    int i_j_the_element = arr[i * m + j];  // use the idiom of i * m + j for arr[i][j] 
    ...
}

void func2(){
    ...
    int arr[n][m];
    ...
    func1(&(arr[0][0]), n, m);
}

固定大小

1. 通过引用传递

template <size_t rows, size_t cols>
void process_2d_array_template(int (&array)[rows][cols])
{
    std::cout << __func__ << std::endl;
    for (size_t i = 0; i < rows; ++i)
    {
        std::cout << i << ": ";
        for (size_t j = 0; j < cols; ++j)
            std::cout << array[i][j] << '\t';
        std::cout << std::endl;
    }
}

在c++中，通过引用传递数组而不丢失维度信息可能是最安全的，因为不需要担心调用者传递不正确的维度(当不匹配时编译器会标记)。然而，这对于动态(独立式)数组是不可能的;它只适用于自动(通常是栈生存的)数组，即维度应该在编译时知道。

2. 传递指针

void process_2d_array_pointer(int (*array)[5][10])
{
    std::cout << __func__ << std::endl;
    for (size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
    {
        std::cout << i << ": ";
        for (size_t j = 0; j < 10; ++j)
            std::cout << (*array)[i][j] << '\t';
        std::cout << std::endl;
    }    
}

The C equivalent of the previous method is passing the array by pointer. This should not be confused with passing by the array's decayed pointer type (3), which is the common, popular method, albeit less safe than this one but more flexible. Like (1), use this method when all the dimensions of the array is fixed and known at compile-time. Note that when calling the function the array's address should be passed process_2d_array_pointer(&a) and not the address of the first element by decay process_2d_array_pointer(a).

变量的大小

这些维继承自C语言，但不太安全，编译器没有办法检查，确保调用者传递了所需的维。该函数仅依赖调用者传入的维度。它们比上面的更灵活，因为不同长度的数组可以不变地传递给它们。

需要记住的是，在C中没有直接将数组传递给函数这样的事情[而在c++中，它们可以作为引用传递(1)];(2)将指针传递给数组，而不是数组本身。始终按原样传递数组成为一个指针复制操作，这得益于数组衰减为指针的特性。

3.传递一个指向衰减类型的指针(value)

// int array[][10] is just fancy notation for the same thing
void process_2d_array(int (*array)[10], size_t rows)
{
    std::cout << __func__ << std::endl;
    for (size_t i = 0; i < rows; ++i)
    {
        std::cout << i << ": ";
        for (size_t j = 0; j < 10; ++j)
            std::cout << array[i][j] << '\t';
        std::cout << std::endl;
    }
}

Although int array[][10] is allowed, I'd not recommend it over the above syntax since the above syntax makes it clear that the identifier array is a single pointer to an array of 10 integers, while this syntax looks like it's a 2D array but is the same pointer to an array of 10 integers. Here we know the number of elements in a single row (i.e. the column size, 10 here) but the number of rows is unknown and hence to be passed as an argument. In this case there's some safety since the compiler can flag when a pointer to an array with second dimension not equal to 10 is passed. The first dimension is the varying part and can be omitted. See here for the rationale on why only the first dimension is allowed to be omitted.

4. 将一个指针传递给另一个指针

// int *array[10] is just fancy notation for the same thing
void process_pointer_2_pointer(int **array, size_t rows, size_t cols)
{
    std::cout << __func__ << std::endl;
    for (size_t i = 0; i < rows; ++i)
    {
        std::cout << i << ": ";
        for (size_t j = 0; j < cols; ++j)
            std::cout << array[i][j] << '\t';
        std::cout << std::endl;
    }
}

Again there's an alternative syntax of int *array[10] which is the same as int **array. In this syntax the [10] is ignored as it decays into a pointer thereby becoming int **array. Perhaps it is just a cue to the caller that the passed array should have at least 10 columns, even then row count is required. In any case the compiler doesn't flag for any length/size violations (it only checks if the type passed is a pointer to pointer), hence requiring both row and column counts as parameter makes sense here.

Note: (4) is the least safest option since it hardly has any type check and the most inconvenient. One cannot legitimately pass a 2D array to this function; C-FAQ condemns the usual workaround of doing int x[5][10]; process_pointer_2_pointer((int**)&x[0][0], 5, 10); as it may potentially lead to undefined behaviour due to array flattening. The right way of passing an array in this method brings us to the inconvenient part i.e. we need an additional (surrogate) array of pointers with each of its element pointing to the respective row of the actual, to-be-passed array; this surrogate is then passed to the function (see below); all this for getting the same job done as the above methods which are more safer, cleaner and perhaps faster.

下面是一个测试上述功能的驱动程序:

#include <iostream>

// copy above functions here

int main()
{
    int a[5][10] = { { } };
    process_2d_array_template(a);
    process_2d_array_pointer(&a);    // <-- notice the unusual usage of addressof (&) operator on an array
    process_2d_array(a, 5);
    // works since a's first dimension decays into a pointer thereby becoming int (*)[10]

    int *b[5];  // surrogate
    for (size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
    {
        b[i] = a[i];
    }
    // another popular way to define b: here the 2D arrays dims may be non-const, runtime var
    // int **b = new int*[5];
    // for (size_t i = 0; i < 5; ++i) b[i] = new int[10];
    process_pointer_2_pointer(b, 5, 10);
    // process_2d_array(b, 5);
    // doesn't work since b's first dimension decays into a pointer thereby becoming int**
}

你可以这样做……

#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

//for changing values in 2D array
void myFunc(double *a,int rows,int cols){
    for(int i=0;i<rows;i++){
        for(int j=0;j<cols;j++){
            *(a+ i*rows + j)+=10.0;
        }
    }
}

//for printing 2D array,similar to myFunc
void printArray(double *a,int rows,int cols){
    cout<<"Printing your array...\n";
    for(int i=0;i<rows;i++){
        for(int j=0;j<cols;j++){
            cout<<*(a+ i*rows + j)<<"  ";
        }
    cout<<"\n";
    }
}

int main(){
    //declare and initialize your array
    double a[2][2]={{1.5 , 2.5},{3.5 , 4.5}};

    //the 1st argument is the address of the first row i.e
    //the first 1D array
    //the 2nd argument is the no of rows of your array
    //the 3rd argument is the no of columns of your array
    myFunc(a[0],2,2);

    //same way as myFunc
    printArray(a[0],2,2);

    return 0;
}

你的输出将如下…

11.5  12.5
13.5  14.5

[10]不是指向指针的指针，它是一个连续的内存块，适合存储100个double类型的值，编译器知道如何寻址，因为你指定了维度。您需要将它作为数组传递给函数。你可以省略初始维度的大小，如下所示:

void f(double p[][10]) {
}

但是，这将不允许您传递除10之外的最后一个维度的数组。

c++中最好的解决方案是使用std::vector<std::vector<double> >:它几乎同样高效，而且明显更方便。

传递多维数组的一个重要的事情是:

第一个数组维度不需要指定。 必须指定第二个维度(任何其他维度)。

1.当全局只有第二个维度可用时(作为宏或全局常量)

const int N = 3;

void print(int arr[][N], int m)
{
int i, j;
for (i = 0; i < m; i++)
  for (j = 0; j < N; j++)
    printf("%d ", arr[i][j]);
}

int main()
{
int arr[][3] = {{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}, {7, 8, 9}};
print(arr, 3);
return 0;
}

2.使用单个指针: 在此方法中，当传递给函数时，必须对2D数组进行类型转换。

void print(int *arr, int m, int n)
{
int i, j;
for (i = 0; i < m; i++)
  for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
    printf("%d ", *((arr+i*n) + j));
 }

int main()
{
int arr[][3] = {{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}, {7, 8, 9}};
int m = 3, n = 3;

// We can also use "print(&arr[0][0], m, n);"
print((int *)arr, m, n);
return 0;
}

你可以省略最左边的维度，所以你最终有两个选项:

void f1(double a[][2][3]) { ... }

void f2(double (*a)[2][3]) { ... }

double a[1][2][3];

f1(a); // ok
f2(a); // ok 

指针也是如此:

// compilation error: cannot convert ‘double (*)[2][3]’ to ‘double***’ 
// double ***p1 = a;

// compilation error: cannot convert ‘double (*)[2][3]’ to ‘double (**)[3]’
// double (**p2)[3] = a;

double (*p3)[2][3] = a; // ok

// compilation error: array of pointers != pointer to array
// double *p4[2][3] = a;

double (*p5)[3] = a[0]; // ok

double *p6 = a[0][1]; // ok

c++标准允许将N维数组衰减为指向N-1维数组的指针，因为您可以丢失最左边的维度，但仍然能够正确访问具有N-1维信息的数组元素。

详情在这里

但是，数组和指针是不一样的:数组可以衰减为指针，但是指针不携带关于它所指向的数据的大小/配置的状态。

char **是指向包含字符指针的内存块的指针，这些字符指针本身指向字符的内存块。char[][]是一个包含字符的内存块。这对编译器如何翻译代码以及最终的性能会产生影响。

源