我有一个情况,有两个领域。Field1和field2。我想要的
当field1被改变时,要做的是空field2,反之亦然。所以只有在最后
一个字段上有内容。
field1 = (EditText)findViewById(R.id.field1);
field2 = (EditText)findViewById(R.id.field2);
field1.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}
public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int count, int after) {
}
public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int before, int count) {
field2.setText("");
}
});
field2.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}
public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int count, int after) {
}
public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int before, int count) {
field1.setText("");
}
});
它工作得很好,如果我附加addTextChangedListener到field1,但当
我对两个字段都这么做,应用程序崩溃了。显然是因为他们想要改变
无限地相互联系。一旦field1改变,此时它就会清除field2
Field2被更改,因此它将清除field1,以此类推……
谁能给点建议吗?
这个回答有点晚了,但这里有一个可重复使用的解决方案:
/**
* An extension of TextWatcher which stops further callbacks being called as
* a result of a change happening within the callbacks themselves.
*/
public abstract class EditableTextWatcher implements TextWatcher {
private boolean editing;
@Override
public final void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int count, int after) {
if (editing)
return;
editing = true;
try {
beforeTextChange(s, start, count, after);
} finally {
editing = false;
}
}
protected abstract void beforeTextChange(CharSequence s, int start,
int count, int after);
@Override
public final void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int before, int count) {
if (editing)
return;
editing = true;
try {
onTextChange(s, start, before, count);
} finally {
editing = false;
}
}
protected abstract void onTextChange(CharSequence s, int start,
int before, int count);
@Override
public final void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {
if (editing)
return;
editing = true;
try {
afterTextChange(s);
} finally {
editing = false;
}
}
public boolean isEditing() {
return editing;
}
protected abstract void afterTextChange(Editable s);
}
因此,当使用上述方法时,在TextWatcher中发生的任何setText()调用都不会导致TextWatcher再次被调用:
/**
* A setText() call in any of the callbacks below will not result in TextWatcher being
* called again.
*/
public class MyTextWatcher extends EditableTextWatcher {
@Override
protected void beforeTextChange(CharSequence s, int start, int count, int after) {
}
@Override
protected void onTextChange(CharSequence s, int start, int before, int count) {
}
@Override
protected void afterTextChange(Editable s) {
}
}
您可以添加一个检查,只在字段中的文本不为空时清除(即当长度不等于0时)。
field1.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
@Override
public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}
@Override
public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int count, int after) {
}
@Override
public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int before, int count) {
if(s.length() != 0)
field2.setText("");
}
});
field2.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
@Override
public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}
@Override
public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int count, int after) {
}
@Override
public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
int before, int count) {
if(s.length() != 0)
field1.setText("");
}
});
这里是TextWatcher的文档。
另外,请尊重命名约定。
如果你正在使用Kotlin进行Android开发,那么你可以使用以下代码添加TextChangedListener():
myTextField.addTextChangedListener(object : TextWatcher{
override fun afterTextChanged(s: Editable?) {}
override fun beforeTextChanged(s: CharSequence?, start: Int, count: Int, after: Int) {}
override fun onTextChanged(s: CharSequence?, start: Int, before: Int, count: Int) {}
})
另一个可能会帮助别人的解决方案。有2个EditText,它们在编辑后相互改变。默认情况下,它导致了周期性。
使用变量:
Boolean uahEdited = false;
Boolean usdEdited = false;
添加TextWatcher
uahEdit = findViewById(R.id.uahEdit);
usdEdit = findViewById(R.id.usdEdit);
uahEdit.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
@Override
public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int count, int after) {
if (!usdEdited) {
uahEdited = true;
}
}
@Override
public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int before, int count) {
String tmp = uahEdit.getText().toString();
if(!tmp.isEmpty() && uahEdited) {
uah = Double.valueOf(tmp);
usd = uah / 27;
usdEdit.setText(String.valueOf(usd));
} else if (tmp.isEmpty()) {
usdEdit.getText().clear();
}
}
@Override
public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {
uahEdited = false;
}
});
usdEdit.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
@Override
public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int count, int after) {
if (!uahEdited) {
usdEdited = true;
}
}
@Override
public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int before, int count) {
String tmp = usdEdit.getText().toString();
if (!tmp.isEmpty() && usdEdited) {
usd = Double.valueOf(tmp);
uah = usd * 27;
uahEdit.setText(String.valueOf(uah));
} else if (tmp.isEmpty()) {
uahEdit.getText().clear();
}
}
@Override
public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {
usdEdited = false;
}
});
不要批评太多。我是一个开发新手