我也遇到过同样的问题，并不断得到stackOverflow异常，我提出了以下解决方案。

edt_amnt_sent.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {    
    @Override
    public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {
        if (skipOnChange)
            return;

        skipOnChange = true;
        try {
            //method
        } catch (NumberFormatException e) {
            // TODO Auto-generated catch block
            e.printStackTrace();
        } finally {
            skipOnChange = false;
        }
    }
});

edt_amnt_receive.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {

    @Override
    public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {

        if (skipOnChange)
            return;

        skipOnChange = true;
        try {
            //method
        } catch (NumberFormatException e) {
            // TODO Auto-generated catch block
            e.printStackTrace();
        } finally {
            skipOnChange = false;
        }
    }
});

skipOnChange = false;

editText.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() 
{
            @Override
            public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence charSequence, int i, int i1, int i2) 
            {
            }

            @Override
            public void onTextChanged(CharSequence chr, int i, int i1, int i2) 
            {
                //Check char sequence is empty or not
                if (chr.length() > 0)
                {
                    //Your Code Here
                }
            }

            @Override
            public void afterTextChanged(Editable editable) 
            {
            }
 });

另一个可能会帮助别人的解决方案。有2个EditText，它们在编辑后相互改变。默认情况下，它导致了周期性。

使用变量:

Boolean uahEdited = false;
Boolean usdEdited = false;

添加TextWatcher

uahEdit = findViewById(R.id.uahEdit);
usdEdit = findViewById(R.id.usdEdit);

uahEdit.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
        @Override
        public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int count, int after) {
            if (!usdEdited) {
                uahEdited = true;
            }
        }

        @Override
        public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int before, int count) {
            String tmp = uahEdit.getText().toString();

            if(!tmp.isEmpty() && uahEdited) {
                uah = Double.valueOf(tmp);
                usd = uah / 27;
                usdEdit.setText(String.valueOf(usd));
            } else if (tmp.isEmpty()) {
                usdEdit.getText().clear();
            }
        }

        @Override
        public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {
            uahEdited = false;
        }
    });

usdEdit.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {
        @Override
        public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int count, int after) {
            if (!uahEdited) {
                usdEdited = true;
            }
        }

        @Override
        public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start, int before, int count) {
            String tmp = usdEdit.getText().toString();

            if (!tmp.isEmpty() && usdEdited) {
                usd = Double.valueOf(tmp);
                uah = usd * 27;
                uahEdit.setText(String.valueOf(uah));
            } else if (tmp.isEmpty()) {
                uahEdit.getText().clear();
            }
        }

        @Override
        public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {
            usdEdited = false;
        }
    });

不要批评太多。我是一个开发新手

您可以添加一个检查，只在字段中的文本不为空时清除(即当长度不等于0时)。

field1.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {

   @Override
   public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}

   @Override    
   public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int count, int after) {
   }

   @Override    
   public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int before, int count) {
      if(s.length() != 0)
        field2.setText("");
   }
  });

field2.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {

   @Override
   public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}

   @Override
   public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int count, int after) {
   }

   @Override
   public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int before, int count) {
      if(s.length() != 0)
         field1.setText("");
   }
  });

这里是TextWatcher的文档。

另外，请尊重命名约定。

我知道这很旧了，但某天有人可能会再次看到它。

I had a similar problem where I would call setText on a EditText and onTextChanged would be called when I didn't want it to. My first solution was to write some code after calling setText() to undo the damage done by the listener. But that wasn't very elegant. After doing some research and testing I discovered that using getText().clear() clears the text in much the same way as setText(""), but since it isn't setting the text the listener isn't called, so that solved my problem. I switched all my setText("") calls to getText().clear() and I didn't need the bandages anymore, so maybe that will solve your problem too.

试试这个:

Field1 = (EditText)findViewById(R.id.field1);
Field2 = (EditText)findViewById(R.id.field2);

Field1.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {

   public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}

   public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int count, int after) {
   }

   public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int before, int count) {
      Field2.getText().clear();
   }
  });

Field2.addTextChangedListener(new TextWatcher() {

   public void afterTextChanged(Editable s) {}

   public void beforeTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int count, int after) {
   }

   public void onTextChanged(CharSequence s, int start,
     int before, int count) {
     Field1.getText().clear();
   }
  });

etSearch.addTextChangedListener(object : TextWatcher {
     override fun beforeTextChanged(p0: CharSequence?, p1: Int, p2: Int, p3: Int) {
          TODO("Not yet implemented")
     }

     override fun onTextChanged(p0: CharSequence?, p1: Int, p2: Int, p3: Int) {
          TODO("Not yet implemented")
     }

     override fun afterTextChanged(p0: Editable?) {
          TODO("Not yet implemented")
     }
})