是否有一种简洁的方法在流上迭代，同时访问流中的索引?
String[] names = {"Sam","Pamela", "Dave", "Pascal", "Erik"};
List<String> nameList;
Stream<Integer> indices = intRange(1, names.length).boxed();
nameList = zip(indices, stream(names), SimpleEntry::new)
.filter(e -> e.getValue().length() <= e.getKey())
.map(Entry::getValue)
.collect(toList());
与这里给出的LINQ示例相比，这似乎相当令人失望
string[] names = { "Sam", "Pamela", "Dave", "Pascal", "Erik" };
var nameList = names.Where((c, index) => c.Length <= index + 1).ToList();
有更简洁的方式吗?
此外，似乎拉链已经移动或被拆除…
如果您需要forEach中的索引，那么这提供了一种方法。
public class IndexedValue {
private final int index;
private final Object value;
public IndexedValue(final int index, final Object value) {
this.index = index;
this.value = value;
}
public int getIndex() {
return index;
}
public Object getValue() {
return value;
}
}
然后像下面这样使用它。
@Test
public void withIndex() {
final List<String> list = Arrays.asList("a", "b");
IntStream.range(0, list.size())
.mapToObj(index -> new IndexedValue(index, list.get(index)))
.forEach(indexValue -> {
System.out.println(String.format("%d, %s",
indexValue.getIndex(),
indexValue.getValue().toString()));
});
}
与https://github.com/poetix/protonpack
你可以做到，zip:
String[] names = {"Sam","Pamela", "Dave", "Pascal", "Erik"};
List<String> nameList;
Stream<Integer> indices = IntStream.range(0, names.length).boxed();
nameList = StreamUtils.zip(indices, stream(names),SimpleEntry::new)
.filter(e -> e.getValue().length() <= e.getKey()).map(Entry::getValue).collect(toList());
System.out.println(nameList);
Java 8流API缺乏获取流元素索引的功能，也缺乏将流压缩在一起的功能。这是不幸的，因为它使某些应用程序(如LINQ挑战)比其他应用程序更难。
然而，经常会有变通办法。通常，这可以通过使用整数范围“驱动”流来实现，并利用原始元素通常位于一个数组或一个可以通过索引访问的集合中这一事实。例如，挑战2的问题可以这样解决:
String[] names = {"Sam", "Pamela", "Dave", "Pascal", "Erik"};
List<String> nameList =
IntStream.range(0, names.length)
.filter(i -> names[i].length() <= i)
.mapToObj(i -> names[i])
.collect(toList());
如上所述，这利用了数据源(名称数组)是直接可索引的这一事实。否则，这项技术就行不通。
我承认这并不能满足挑战2的目的。尽管如此，它还是相当有效地解决了这个问题。
EDIT
我前面的代码示例使用flatMap来融合过滤器和映射操作，但这很麻烦，而且没有任何好处。我已经根据Holger的评论更新了示例。
我在这里找到了解决方案，当流创建的列表或数组(你知道的大小)。但是如果Stream的大小未知呢?在这种情况下，试试这个变体:
public class WithIndex<T> {
private int index;
private T value;
WithIndex(int index, T value) {
this.index = index;
this.value = value;
}
public int index() {
return index;
}
public T value() {
return value;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return value + "(" + index + ")";
}
public static <T> Function<T, WithIndex<T>> indexed() {
return new Function<T, WithIndex<T>>() {
int index = 0;
@Override
public WithIndex<T> apply(T t) {
return new WithIndex<>(index++, t);
}
};
}
}
用法:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Stream<String> stream = Stream.of("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
stream.map(WithIndex.indexed()).forEachOrdered(e -> {
System.out.println(e.index() + " -> " + e.value());
});
}
如果您不介意使用第三方库，Eclipse Collections有zipWithIndex和forEachWithIndex可供跨多种类型使用。下面是针对JDK类型和Eclipse Collections类型使用zipWithIndex的一组解决方案。
String[] names = { "Sam", "Pamela", "Dave", "Pascal", "Erik" };
ImmutableList<String> expected = Lists.immutable.with("Erik");
Predicate<Pair<String, Integer>> predicate =
pair -> pair.getOne().length() <= pair.getTwo() + 1;
// JDK Types
List<String> strings1 = ArrayIterate.zipWithIndex(names)
.collectIf(predicate, Pair::getOne);
Assert.assertEquals(expected, strings1);
List<String> list = Arrays.asList(names);
List<String> strings2 = ListAdapter.adapt(list)
.zipWithIndex()
.collectIf(predicate, Pair::getOne);
Assert.assertEquals(expected, strings2);
// Eclipse Collections types
MutableList<String> mutableNames = Lists.mutable.with(names);
MutableList<String> strings3 = mutableNames.zipWithIndex()
.collectIf(predicate, Pair::getOne);
Assert.assertEquals(expected, strings3);
ImmutableList<String> immutableNames = Lists.immutable.with(names);
ImmutableList<String> strings4 = immutableNames.zipWithIndex()
.collectIf(predicate, Pair::getOne);
Assert.assertEquals(expected, strings4);
MutableList<String> strings5 = mutableNames.asLazy()
.zipWithIndex()
.collectIf(predicate, Pair::getOne, Lists.mutable.empty());
Assert.assertEquals(expected, strings5);
下面是一个使用forEachWithIndex的解决方案。
MutableList<String> mutableNames =
Lists.mutable.with("Sam", "Pamela", "Dave", "Pascal", "Erik");
ImmutableList<String> expected = Lists.immutable.with("Erik");
List<String> actual = Lists.mutable.empty();
mutableNames.forEachWithIndex((name, index) -> {
if (name.length() <= index + 1)
actual.add(name);
});
Assert.assertEquals(expected, actual);
如果您将上述lambdas更改为匿名内部类，那么所有这些代码示例都可以在Java 5 - 7中工作。
注意:我是Eclipse Collections的提交者
